RE: [Cooker] Attempt to install 9.0 beta1 - hard drive designations incorrect

2002-07-25 Thread Grace, Brandon

When you boot your system I would suggest hardcoding your drives ie 

boot: linux ide0=0x1f0,0x1f2,15 ide1=0x170,0x172,14 
syntax is as follows
ide0=memory_addr_as_reported_in_dmsg,memory_addr from
previus+2,irq_of_controller

I was having this problem as you have described w/ mdk and redhat @ one time
but found that the os was really changing the order to which it was
detecting the drives so I had to hard code the settings in lilo.conf and
when starting the install I had to do the above method.. If I can be of any
help please feel free to reply...



___
Brandon Grace
Network Security Analyst 
TTUnet Network Operations Center 
Texas Tech University 
___ 
ô¿ô Linux,
Bringing The World To a Brave New Front
THE RIGHT ONE





-Original Message-
From: Gerry Tool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 13:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Attempt to install 9.0 beta1 - hard drive designations
incorrect


I have a Soyo Dragon Platinum mainboard with 4 IDE channels.  Channels 1 and
2 
are standard Ultra-133 channels.  Channels 3 and 4 are IDE-Raid channels 
provided by a HIghpoint HPT372 controller, operating as normal IDE channels,

not raid.

I have a 100GB drive on Channel 1 as master - known as hda in my existing 
RedHat linux installations. (also contains the MBR and windows partitions)

I have a 6GB drive on Channel 3 as master - known as hde on my existing
RedHat 
linux installations.

I have a 4GB drive on Channel 4 as master - known ast hdg .

While trying to install Mandrake 9.0 beta 1, the installer identifies the
6GB 
drive as hda, the 4GB as hdc, and the 100GB as hde.  When I try to use the 6

and 4 GB drives to install 9.0 beta 1, it cannot revise the drives tables.

I believe there is a major misidentification of these drives by 9.0 beta 1.

Any ideas?

Gerry Tool




Re: [Cooker] Attempt to install 9.0 beta1 - hard drive designations incorrect

2002-07-25 Thread Rolf Pedersen

Gerry Tool wrote:
 I have a Soyo Dragon Platinum mainboard with 4 IDE channels.  Channels 1 and 2 
 are standard Ultra-133 channels.  Channels 3 and 4 are IDE-Raid channels 
 provided by a HIghpoint HPT372 controller, operating as normal IDE channels, 
 not raid.
 
 I have a 100GB drive on Channel 1 as master - known as hda in my existing 
 RedHat linux installations. (also contains the MBR and windows partitions)
 
 I have a 6GB drive on Channel 3 as master - known as hde on my existing RedHat 
 linux installations.
 
 I have a 4GB drive on Channel 4 as master - known ast hdg .
 
 While trying to install Mandrake 9.0 beta 1, the installer identifies the 6GB 
 drive as hda, the 4GB as hdc, and the 100GB as hde.  When I try to use the 6 
 and 4 GB drives to install 9.0 beta 1, it cannot revise the drives tables.
 
 I believe there is a major misidentification of these drives by 9.0 beta 1.  
 Any ideas?
 
 Gerry Tool
 
 
 

I have the hpt372 onboard  Iwill xp333r, for which up-to-the-latest Mandrake 
kernel provides hde,-f,-g,-h.  Days of trying and, even, an RMA have netted me 
only fleeting successes with fdisk, sfdisk, et al and no successful data 
transfers.  Are you able to read/write to this controller as ide drives with the 
Red Hat kernel?

Recently, I have been able to access and easily format a drive on the hpt, 
prozilla the beta iso's to it, and gcombust perfect disks from it after 
utilizing the tantalizingly-but-misleadingly named hpt3xx-opensource-v13.tgz 
from Highpoint: http://www.highpoint-tech.com/.  This entails a small edit of a 
.c file in kernel-source, kernel build, and driver compile from the quasi-open 
tarball.  The drives on this controller then become sda, -b, etc.

lsmod
[..]
scsi_mod   90364   5  [sg sr_mod hpt37x2 ide-scsi sd_mod]

I can't guess why your drive id's get switched that way.