Re: [Cooker] acpid
So sprach »Tom Berger« am 2001-08-23 um 13:41:37 +0200 : > But you can choose not to run KDE. That's a bit different, don't you > think? Theoretically, yes. But with 32 MB of RAM, I don't think that 120k are that much after all. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 10 hours 6 minutes
Re: [Cooker] acpid
On Aug 23 2001, 15:11 +, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only > > drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K. > > > > > > Is it a joke? 128MB was not enough to run KDE normally - I could only > hear my HD swapping. And you care about 120K? Of course, I do not > suggest including it into boot kernel. > > -andrej ---tom:--- But you can choose not to run KDE. That's a bit different, don't you think? tom -- Tom Berger, Maintainer of MandrakeUser.Org, General Nuisance Since 1999 GPG-ID: 0x6AD65877 http://germany.keyserver.net/ Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Is it a bad sign if you spend the day wondering why there are no laws against what you do for a living?" (Dilbert)
RE: [Cooker] acpid
> > OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only > drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K. > > Is it a joke? 128MB was not enough to run KDE normally - I could only hear my HD swapping. And you care about 120K? Of course, I do not suggest including it into boot kernel. -andrej > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > > > No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-( > > > (ACPI is not available as a module). > > > > > > > Have you really tested it? I did and it works. If you compile in both > > and specify noacpi command-line kernel option ACPI is not started. And > > (I have currently no kernel sources) I bet it can be made default. > > > > -andrej > > > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > > > > > > > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us > > > > choose which module to use? > > > > > > > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > > > > > > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't > > > > > use acpid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > > > SI Reasoning > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC > > > > > > > > __ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! > > Messenger > > > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > > >
RE: [Cooker] acpid
OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K. On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-( > > (ACPI is not available as a module). > > > > Have you really tested it? I did and it works. If you compile in both > and specify noacpi command-line kernel option ACPI is not started. And > (I have currently no kernel sources) I bet it can be made default. > > -andrej > > > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > > > > > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us > > > choose which module to use? > > > > > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > > > > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't > > > > use acpid > > > > > > > > > > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > > SI Reasoning > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! > Messenger > > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > >
RE: [Cooker] acpid
> No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-( > (ACPI is not available as a module). > Have you really tested it? I did and it works. If you compile in both and specify noacpi command-line kernel option ACPI is not started. And (I have currently no kernel sources) I bet it can be made default. -andrej > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > > > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us > > choose which module to use? > > > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't > > > use acpid > > > > > > > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > SI Reasoning > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] acpid
Is there not a script that you could create to allow for the choice between the two? Make it part of the install script and part of mcc? --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets > precedence over APM :-( > (ACPI is not available as a module). > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > > > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us > > choose which module to use? > > > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > > > > > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > > > > > well that doen't change anything since we > don't > > > use acpid > > > > > > > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > > > > > > > > > > > = > > SI Reasoning > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC > > > > __ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute > with Yahoo! Messenger > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > = SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] acpid
No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-( (ACPI is not available as a module). On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us > choose which module to use? > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't > > use acpid > > > > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > > > > > > = > SI Reasoning > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] acpid
Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us choose which module to use? --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > There's a new acpid: > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't > use acpid > > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self. > > = SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
RE: [Cooker] acpid
> > > There's a new acpid: > > well that doen't change anything since we don't use acpid Why? As I already wrote - if you compile both ACPI and APM and use noacpi (I guess - have to check), it won't be used. Actually, I believe, it can be made default, so people who want to test ACPI will do it and others won't even notice it. I personally would like to see my system finally doing Suspend to RAM, just like Windows. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] acpid
On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There's a new acpid: > > well that doen't change anything since we don't use acpid > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self.
Re: [Cooker] acpid
"Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's a new acpid: well that doen't change anything since we don't use acpid
