Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group
I agree, it very nicely indicates software that is in development mode and potentially quite unstable. It has my vote. John Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > > Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ creating a hack root menu group for hack*applis ] > > What do you think? Stupid idea, isn't it? > > good idea for me, but flepied is the last voice on this subject. > > -- > MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com > Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ creating a hack root menu group for hack*applis ] > What do you think? Stupid idea, isn't it? good idea for me, but flepied is the last voice on this subject. -- MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com Pasadena, CA USA --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group
--Original Message-- From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 9, 2000 10:29:48 PM GMT Subject: Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, you wrote: > Let's make a "hack" menu group. When some package is in development > (hackgimp, hackmozilla, etc. etc.) we can put those packages in there > (with the same structure --> hackmozilla = Hack/Networking/WWW ). > > The advantage I see is that the menu system is already put into these > packages, and keeping them seperate from the "official" distro. Also, > once the package is moved into cooker (the hack disapears), then the > "hack" is removed from the menu entry. > > Disadvantage: poluting the current menu structure? > > What do you think? Stupid idea, isn't it? > > Stefan Stefan, no ideas are bad or stupid. They all make others think and they often trigger a "useful chain of thought" when they are not in themselves useful. This one seems interesting and deserving of refinement. Civileme Is it possible to place the directory stucture in as a sub directoro and use it as a sub menu? Jarod1st
Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, you wrote: > Let's make a "hack" menu group. When some package is in development > (hackgimp, hackmozilla, etc. etc.) we can put those packages in there > (with the same structure --> hackmozilla = Hack/Networking/WWW ). > > The advantage I see is that the menu system is already put into these > packages, and keeping them seperate from the "official" distro. Also, > once the package is moved into cooker (the hack disapears), then the > "hack" is removed from the menu entry. > > Disadvantage: poluting the current menu structure? > > What do you think? Stupid idea, isn't it? > > Stefan Stefan, no ideas are bad or stupid. They all make others think and they often trigger a "useful chain of thought" when they are not in themselves useful. This one seems interesting and deserving of refinement. Civileme
