Re: [Cooker] RPM GROUPS proposal
Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As you all might have noticed I have packed a lot of php and other web specific applications (like osCommerce), but I don't feel comfortable using any of the current RPM GROUPS. Couldn't we have something else like Networking/WWW/Servers, Networking/WWW/Mail, etc. ? Networking/WWW is too generic for me... I like this one: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/ With a few tweaks. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] RPM GROUPS proposal
On söndagen den 29 september 2002 20.40 Han Boetes wrote: Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As you all might have noticed I have packed a lot of php and other web specific applications (like osCommerce), but I don't feel comfortable using any of the current RPM GROUPS. Couldn't we have something else like Networking/WWW/Servers, Networking/WWW/Mail, etc. ? Networking/WWW is too generic for me... I like this one: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/ With a few tweaks. Very funny... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks - http://d-srv.com
Re: [Cooker] RPM GROUPS proposal
Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On söndagen den 29 september 2002 20.40 Han Boetes wrote: Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As you all might have noticed I have packed a lot of php and other web specific applications (like osCommerce), but I don't feel comfortable using any of the current RPM GROUPS. Couldn't we have something else like Networking/WWW/Servers, Networking/WWW/Mail, etc. ? Networking/WWW is too generic for me... I like this one: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/ With a few tweaks. Very funny... Yes but it wasn't a joke. Any attempt at categorizing software will fail since lots of packages fall into two or more categories. Like ``net'' seems nice but nearly anything falls into that category. So better make a simple one that doesn't pretend to be precise. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] RPM GROUPS proposal
On söndagen den 29 september 2002 23.15 Han Boetes wrote: Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On söndagen den 29 september 2002 20.40 Han Boetes wrote: Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As you all might have noticed I have packed a lot of php and other web specific applications (like osCommerce), but I don't feel comfortable using any of the current RPM GROUPS. Couldn't we have something else like Networking/WWW/Servers, Networking/WWW/Mail, etc. ? Networking/WWW is too generic for me... I like this one: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/ With a few tweaks. Very funny... Yes but it wasn't a joke. Any attempt at categorizing software will fail since lots of packages fall into two or more categories. Like ``net'' seems nice but nearly anything falls into that category. So better make a simple one that doesn't pretend to be precise. I really do understand the problem, but doing cat /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.0.4/GROUPS reveals a whole bunch of useless groups as I see it. In my sphere I have only Monitoring, Networking/Other, Networking/WWW and System/Servers to play with... I ended up using System/Servers on most of my packages... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks - http://d-srv.com
