Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
Ainsi parlait Levi Ramsey : On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? What's the problem with PLF packages ? Just import the key in rpm database. -- Guillaume Rousse If you can't beat them, join them, then beat them -- Anti- Murphy's Laws n°7
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On Wed 06 Aug 2003 12:12, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... It hasn't been prompting me every since I updated the RPM GPG database with the PLF key (as we originally had to do with the Mdk keys as well, when rpm 4.2 came out, as the initial packages didn't import them automatically). -- Duncan - List replies preferred. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On Wed 06 Aug 2003 14:41, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: On Wed Aug 06 13:18 -0700, Duncan wrote: On Wed 06 Aug 2003 12:12, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... It hasn't been prompting me every since I updated the RPM GPG database with the PLF key (as we originally had to do with the Mdk keys as well, when rpm 4.2 came out, as the initial packages didn't import them automatically). I've attempted numerous times, using different downloads of the PLF key, to import into rpm... no dice. Did you read the man page and import the key using the procedure (and type of key=ascii-armored) there? I've had no problems doing that. Note that at least originally, each key had to be within its own ascii-armored file, not several combined into one file, or it could corrupt the RPM db. If you've tried multiple times and did it wrong say the first time, perhaps that's what happened and it will import no new keys, tho perhaps the damage isn't so bad and the mdk keys continue to work. Other than that, about all I can say is it worked here, which doesn't of course offer any explanation of why it might fail there, unfortunately. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On Wed Aug 06 13:18 -0700, Duncan wrote: On Wed 06 Aug 2003 12:12, Levi Ramsey posted as excerpted below: On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... It hasn't been prompting me every since I updated the RPM GPG database with the PLF key (as we originally had to do with the Mdk keys as well, when rpm 4.2 came out, as the initial packages didn't import them automatically). I've attempted numerous times, using different downloads of the PLF key, to import into rpm... no dice. -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take due notice and govern yourselves accordingly. Currently playing: Rush - Signals - Digital Man Linux 2.4.21-3mdk 17:40:00 up 2 days, 2:58, 15 users, load average: 0.49, 0.38, 0.28
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On 08.06, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Levi Ramsey : On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? What's the problem with PLF packages ? Just import the key in rpm database. (CCed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Now that you say it, since a recent urpmi update, I get this: werewolf:~# urpmi --auto-select ... medium PLF uses an invalid list file: mirror is probably not up-to-date, trying to use alternate method ... -- J.A. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.22-rc1-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.7mdk))
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? It could, urpmi will now search for armored file (if available) and use it to import automatically the key in rpmdb and add automatically too the id in urpmi.cfg for the given media, this means no other package (without the given key) will be allowed, of course this still need some testing but the core code is here. If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... It could be so. Francois.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 20:12, Levi Ramsey wrote: On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? If it does, then I worship the ground on which you walk... Er, to fix that, you just need the PLF key... http://plf.zarb.org/plf.asc -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-URPM-0.93-1mdk
On 08.06, J.A. Magallon wrote: On 08.06, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Levi Ramsey : On Wed Aug 06 20:00 +0200, François Pons wrote: * Wed Aug 06 2003 Fran?ois Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.93-1mdk - added URPM::Signature for handling armored gpg file and internal rpm pubkey. Does this mean that urpmi won't prompt on PLF packages? What's the problem with PLF packages ? Just import the key in rpm database. (CCed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Now that you say it, since a recent urpmi update, I get this: werewolf:~# urpmi --auto-select ... medium PLF uses an invalid list file: mirror is probably not up-to-date, trying to use alternate method ... More info: this happens with synthesys.hdlist.cz, not with hdlist.cz. -- J.A. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.22-rc1-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.7mdk))
