Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk

2000-03-08 Thread Pablo Saratxaga 

Kaixo!

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:21:45AM -0400, Camille Begnis wrote:

  Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake
  Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
  Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar 06 05:56:46 2000
 
 I just noticed, why a decimal release number?

Because it was decimal (0.4mdk) before :)

rpm, glibc, XFree86, kernel are among the ones that are often changed, 
patched, tested etc. You can see that here: it is already the 5th rebuild
of the package for the version 3.0.4.

So decimal releases are used, so when it goes out of cooker to an official
Mandrake release, or to the updates page, it can be made as "1mdk"; which
looks better.

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk

2000-03-06 Thread Camille Begnis 

geoffrey lee wrote:
 
 hi,
 
 coz rpm 3.0.4 is in alpha/beta. can't remember which.  it was like glibc
 pre4 a while ago. it had 0.1mdk.

Shouldn't be hackrpm-3.0.4-5mdk.rpm then?

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Camille Begnis
  Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:22 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
 
 
  Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
  
   --=-=-=
   Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake
   Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
   Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar
  06 05:56:46 2000
 
  I just noticed, why a decimal release number?
  (To be added in mdk-rpm...)
 
  Thanks, Camille.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk

2000-03-06 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah 

Camille Begnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Shouldn't be hackrpm-3.0.4-5mdk.rpm then?

no because the rpm-3.0.4 is the current version and less buggy than
rpm-3.0.3, hackWHATEVER is here only when you want to provide two set
of rpm one stable and one developement.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena, CA USA  --Chmouel