"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you think? Do you think the resulting ipsec.o will be any different
> (materially, I am not talking about size or anything) for kernel-fb than
> it would be for kernel, or kernel-smp? Perhaps maybe only
> kernel-secure, but I doubt it would be different for that either.
> Granted I am using it against kernel-fb.
> Perhaps the freeswan package could contain the ipsec.o from all the
> different kernel packages and install, the proper ipsec.o when the
> freeswan package is installed.
Yes, and this is a pain to generate with the normal kenrel rpm (because i
will have to list each modules).
> > I think it's expensive for low memory machine.
> Really? I was under the impression that the memory that initrd uses to
> boot is given back when it is done.
on the boot you have a block of memory reserved for the bios and after
you store the whole unziped initrd with unzipped kernel in memory.
--
MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
