Re: [Cooker] Sendmail is STILL broken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:25:24PM +0100, Pixel wrote: > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > done in sendmail-*-2mdk Thank you! Just send me an address for my first born. :-) b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] Sendmail is STILL broken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -/usr/sbin/sendmail > +%attr(4555,root,root) /usr/sbin/sendmail done in sendmail-*-2mdk
Re: [Cooker] Sendmail is STILL broken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Pixel wrote: > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why is this so friggin' difficult to fix? Just go checkout the > > friggin' specfile change one simple %files entry and check the damn > > thing back in again! Is it really that friggin' difficult? Jeez, > > give me commit permisions to the CVS repository and I will do it > > myself. > > i don't think people would agree to give CVS access to anybody, I was being sarcastic. :-) > but a patch is > welcome so that anyone (i) can apply it, the maintainer will review > afterwards... It's a one line fix that I am sure anyone can come up with, but here is a patch: --- /tmp/sendmail.spec Mon Jan 29 07:09:43 2001 +++ /tmp/sendmail.spec.new Mon Jan 29 07:11:40 2001 @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ /usr/bin/vacation /usr/sbin/mail.local /usr/sbin/makemap -/usr/sbin/sendmail +%attr(4555,root,root) /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/sbin/mailstats /usr/sbin/praliases /usr/sbin/smrsh My thanks to whomever approves and applies it. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
Re: [Cooker] Sendmail is STILL broken!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why is this so friggin' difficult to fix? Just go checkout the > friggin' specfile change one simple %files entry and check the damn > thing back in again! Is it really that friggin' difficult? Jeez, > give me commit permisions to the CVS repository and I will do it > myself. i don't think people would agree to give CVS access to anybody, but a patch is welcome so that anyone (i) can apply it, the maintainer will review afterwards...
