Re: [Cooker] Text-version of MandrakeUpdate v0.0.0.1

2001-01-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:48:03PM -0700, Prana wrote:
 I've just started working on the text version of MandrakeUpdate a few
 hours ago, in C++, using libcurl + librpm... it's still very alpha
 quality and still not very usable.

Are you leveraging off of the code in MandrakeUpdate?  They already
have the heuristics for version comparison etc. worked out.  You
really should be using a common code base with MandrakeUpdate for this
sort of stuff.
 
b.


-- 
Brian J. Murrell




Re: [Cooker] Text-version of MandrakeUpdate v0.0.0.1

2001-01-27 Thread Prana

Good idea, however I'm not used to copycatting/plagiarizing other
people's code. I myself haven't taken a look at it. It'll be okay.

Prana

"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
 
 Are you leveraging off of the code in MandrakeUpdate?  They already
 have the heuristics for version comparison etc. worked out.  You
 really should be using a common code base with MandrakeUpdate for this
 sort of stuff.
 
 b.
 
 --
 Brian J. Murrell

-- 
Prana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cyest.org
My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21)
Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8866 0F40 A801  D9DA 6BED 6641 3334 3FD3
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x33343FD3




Re: [Cooker] Text-version of MandrakeUpdate v0.0.0.1

2001-01-27 Thread dam's

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prana) writes:

 Good idea, however I'm not used to copycatting/plagiarizing other
 people's code. I myself haven't taken a look at it. It'll be okay.

you know, free software are made to be reused. So you can save time, use and
improve code. But it's up to you, do as you like it.

-- 
dam's




Re: [Cooker] Text-version of MandrakeUpdate v0.0.0.1

2001-01-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:46:31PM -0700, Prana wrote:
 Good idea, however I'm not used to copycatting/plagiarizing other
 people's code.

You don't understand "OpenSource" do you?  As long as you do not claim
the work you leverage off of as your own work it is not
"plagiarizing".  Copycatting (good code) is a good thing in software
development not a bad thing.

 I myself haven't taken a look at it. It'll be okay.

But why do extra work that has already been done before?  Don't
re-invent the wheel.  It's already perfect.  There is nothing more
than can be done to it to make it better.  Use it and make something
more useful with it.

~sigh~

b. 


-- 
Brian J. Murrell




Re: [Cooker] Text-version of MandrakeUpdate v0.0.0.1

2001-01-27 Thread Prana

"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
 You don't understand "OpenSource" do you?  As long as you do not claim
 the work you leverage off of as your own work it is not
 "plagiarizing".  Copycatting (good code) is a good thing in software
 development not a bad thing.
It's not that don't understand Open Source. FYI, I'm a member of Gnome
Foundation too, and I've published some of my software too, from
Assembly, Pascal, C, to C++, and they're open-source. It's just my old
habbit not to copycat.

However, I think you and damien are right.  At the first time I thought
I want to do everything from scratch. Hrhm.. but you're right, I'll have
to develop this pretty quickly before 7.3/8.0 is out. I'll have to reuse
some of the function in MandrakeUpdate. Point well taken :)

Starting from tomorrow, it will be available from
http://www.cyest.org/drakupdatetxt

Prana

 But why do extra work that has already been done before?  Don't
 re-invent the wheel.  It's already perfect.  There is nothing more
 than can be done to it to make it better.  Use it and make something
 more useful with it.


-- 
Prana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cyest.org
My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21)
Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8866 0F40 A801  D9DA 6BED 6641 3334 3FD3
http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x33343FD3