Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
On 3 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus getting more files on the first cd? http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/ So? quote However, PNG won't replace JPEG. For photographic images that can tolerate loss, JPEG usually produces smaller, more easily transferrable files. /quote But anyway it is not a priority ;-). PNG will do the work. -- 7:18pm up 9 days, 8:21, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.09, 0.08 __ | / \ |Iouri Goussev// \\ \_\\ //_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _\\()//_ .'/()\'. Foo-Bar / // \\ \ jgs\\ // http://foobar.irc-unix.net| \__/ | I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus getting more files on the first cd? http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus getting more files on the first cd? 1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have) 2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible
Re: [Cooker] advertising PNG files?
Pixel wrote: Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus getting more files on the first cd? 1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have) 2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible Can you ensure please that the pngs are as crushed as possible (this applies also to ads in the rcs and final)? I have been doing installs with vgalo to avoid having to d/l them on network insts and load/render them on cdrom/hd insts. my good mirrors have all dropped like flies ;(, each little pic takes 12 mins :P
