Re: [Cooker] Eclipse 2.1 hangs ... ?

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Thomas Lionel SMETS wrote:
 I upgraded my MDK 9.0 to 9.1

9.1 is an ancient (for this list) release. Please send your question to
list that deals with the stable releases (not the list that is working
on 10.0 now).

 from a CD  have now KDE desktop instead of
 Gnome. Moreover I decided to do an install with a 'higher' ('standart' 
 'High'  'Higher'  'Paranoid') security Level. The install went OK but
 know I seem to have lost a fair-bit of steering power.

Yes, security always sacrifices ease-of-use.

 If I try to start LinuxConf from a normal user terminal where I su'ed,
 it cannot connect to the X-client. So I did a 'xhost +127.0.0.1' with a
 'xhost +192.168.1.105' (my IP) as root or as the user...
 
 I keep getting :
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# Error message from remadmin :
 Error message from remadmin :Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
 
 What else do I need to do ... ?

This is a generic X error, but has nothing to do with your eclipse problem.

Please, try the other lists Mandrake provides, expert and newbie may be
appropriate.

Regards,
Buchan

P.S. Eclipse works fine on my cooker box, since about the time it was
quite close to 9.1.

-- 
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7




Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-14 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
 Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for the
 eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or main?)
 as well?
 Someone feels up to it?
Maybe not what you want exactly, but David Walluck created mdk eclipse 
packages in jpackage, which should be included in boxed 9.2 edition. Anyway, 
they are available on jpackage web site, see www.jpackage.org
-- 
Guillaume Rousse
Uniforms only come in two sizes, too small and too large
-- Murphy's Military Laws n°105




Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for the
 eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or main?)
 as well?
 Someone feels up to it?

Note it's gcj 3.5 snapshot ... and apparently slower than with a JRE.

Maybe Gwenole has a surprise for us (but OpenOffice.org 1.1 may make
more people happy).

Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/MWnQrJK6UGDSBKcRAoq/AJ9ULDjueiGBP7neeWdgmslCSW3caACgy68L
JJ4MY7hDLif5Aqk5kIsHELM=
=xI7R
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

**
Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our
e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy.
**



Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-14 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Guillaume Rousse wrote:
 Ainsi parlait Gwenole Beauchesne :

AFAIK, it uses a patched version of gcc from tree-ssa-branch which is
to be integrated into 3.4 or 3.5. We don't have any of those. We could
but maintaining yet another compiler is not fun. Doesn't Eclipse over
Kaffe comes close after a gcj built version, performance wise?

 Are you sure eclipse will run with kaffe, even if it lacks any swing/awt
 support ?

AFAIK, swing/awt support don't matter, only swt ... but I have my doubts
about it running under kaffe.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/MnNLrJK6UGDSBKcRAhCyAJ92/C3OZ9bOELcBsOCrPf4xTzhdnACeImq5
jLJfSM9fb+oE7bzlGriDDmQ=
=QVfE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

**
Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our
e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy.
**



Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-14 Thread Marcel Pol
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:14:58 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for the 
 eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or main?) 
 as well?
 Someone feels up to it?

I was planning to take at least a look at it, but the weather is just too hot
to do anything besides vegetating.
I'm not sure if the patches it needs for gcj are too big or not, and since I'm
not a programmer I'm not sure if I can manage, but I'm willing to check it
out.
It seems there's no oprofile in cooker, which is listed as a buildrequires.
Building that now.

--
Marcel Pol





Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-14 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
mercredi 6 août 2003, à 10:14  pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for 
the
eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or 
main?)
as well?
AFAIK, it uses a patched version of gcc from tree-ssa-branch which is 
to be integrated into 3.4 or 3.5. We don't have any of those. We could 
but maintaining yet another compiler is not fun. Doesn't Eclipse over 
Kaffe comes close after a gcj built version, performance wise?




Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-08 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait Gwenole Beauchesne :
 mercredi 6 août 2003, à 10:14  pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
  Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for
  the
  eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or
  main?)
  as well?

 AFAIK, it uses a patched version of gcc from tree-ssa-branch which is
 to be integrated into 3.4 or 3.5. We don't have any of those. We could
 but maintaining yet another compiler is not fun. Doesn't Eclipse over
 Kaffe comes close after a gcj built version, performance wise?
Are you sure eclipse will run with kaffe, even if it lacks any swing/awt 
support ?
-- 
Guillaume Rousse
Average temperature increases with the amount of clothing brought
-- Murphy's Laws of Camping n°10




Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-07 Thread Austin
On 08/06/2003 09:17:15 PM, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Maybe not what you want exactly, but David Walluck created mdk eclipse

packages in jpackage, which should be included in boxed 9.2 edition.
Actually, that's probably better than a gcj rpm.

Austin



Re: [Cooker] eclipse

2003-08-06 Thread Austin
On 08/06/2003 04:14:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Surprised i see no-one else about this, but RH provides a src.rpm for
the
eclipse IDE build with gcj. I think we can put it in contribs (or
main?)
as well?
Someone feels up to it?
Hmmm, can't find it.
Do you have a link for this?
I'm doing eric already... why not another?
Austin