Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using .tar files? thanks this is required by Mplayer for example. False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems. yes but new binutils breaks cvs build.
Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1
Ainsi parlait Ben V : hi Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using .tar files? thanks this is required by Mplayer for example. False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems. -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1
believe it or not, the mplayer people actually rag on gcc3 more than 2.96 in some of their documentation. It is a nice program but it comes with an attitudinal attachment. --- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ainsi parlait Ben V : hi Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using .tar files? thanks this is required by Mplayer for example. False, you can compile mplayer with 2.96 without problems. -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html = SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] There never was a good war or a bad peace. Benjamin Franklin __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.0.1
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ben V wrote: Just for information before i go further, could anybody tell me the risk to upgrade to gcc-3.0.1, using .tar files? thanks Install gcc3 from contrib. It can co-exist with gcc-2.96. seb