Re: [Cooker] gtk+2 doesn't rebuild (on bi)

2001-06-01 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog

On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

> >Yes, I saw almost all packages using libtool warn about this too,
> >though it seems not making any serious error for me so far.
> >
> I'm suspecting that the packages listen in:
>
> http://d10179.upc-d.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/libtool/
>
> have libtool problems... Do they behave the same on your sys?

Not really... it's strange that, though lots of warnings appear, those
recompiled softwares seem to be working perfectly.

Abel





Re: [Cooker] gtk+2 doesn't rebuild (on bi)

2001-06-01 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:

>On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
>>I'm not sure. I saw alot of libtool stuff flash by:
>>
>>/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
>>-I..-I../gdk-pixbuf -I../gdk-pixbuf
>>   -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG
>>-I/usr/include/glib-2.0
>>-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
>>"-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/1.3.5/loaders\""   -O3
>>-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=i586 -ffast-math
>>-fno-strength-reduce -Wall -c io-png.c
>>../libtool: test: =: unary operator expected
>>
>  
>
>Yes, I saw almost all packages using libtool warn about this too,
>though it seems not making any serious error for me so far.
>
I'm suspecting that the packages listen in:

http://d10179.upc-d.chello.nl/build/cooker/i586/libtool/

have libtool problems... Do they behave the same on your sys?

Stefan





Re: [Cooker] gtk+2 doesn't rebuild (on bi)

2001-06-01 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog

On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:

> I'm not sure. I saw alot of libtool stuff flash by:
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
> -I..-I../gdk-pixbuf -I../gdk-pixbuf
>-DG_ENABLE_DEBUG
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
> "-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/1.3.5/loaders\""   -O3
> -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=i586 -ffast-math
> -fno-strength-reduce -Wall -c io-png.c
> ../libtool: test: =: unary operator expected
  

Yes, I saw almost all packages using libtool warn about this too,
though it seems not making any serious error for me so far.

Abel





Re: [Cooker] gtk+2 doesn't rebuild (on bi)

2001-06-01 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

David Odin wrote:

>On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:06:47PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
>
>>gtk+2 doesn't recompile anymore on bi. i wanted to fix some 
>>buildrequires (libatk0-devel and pango-devel are also required by 
>>gtk+2), and found out it refuses to rebuild on bi.
>>
>  Hmm. It looks like a libpng related problem. 
>
I'm not sure. I saw alot of libtool stuff flash by:

/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I..-I../gdk-pixbuf -I../gdk-pixbuf
   -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
"-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/1.3.5/loaders\""   -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=i586 -ffast-math 
-fno-strength-reduce -Wall -c io-png.c
../libtool: test: =: unary operator expected
rm -f .libs/gdk-pixbuf-util.lo
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../gdk-pixbuf 
-I../gdk-pixbuf -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-DPIXBUF_LIBDIR=\"/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/1.3.5/loaders\" -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=i586 -ffast-math 
-fno-strength-reduce
-Wall -c gdk-pixbuf-util.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gdk-pixbuf-util.lo
../libtool: test: =: unary operator expected
rm -f .libs/io-png.lo







Re: [Cooker] gtk+2 doesn't rebuild (on bi)

2001-06-01 Thread David Odin

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:06:47PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> gtk+2 doesn't recompile anymore on bi. i wanted to fix some 
> buildrequires (libatk0-devel and pango-devel are also required by 
> gtk+2), and found out it refuses to rebuild on bi.
> 
  Hmm. It looks like a libpng related problem. 

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]