Quoting "\"Andrey Borzenkov\" " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > Quoting Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I do not know if it specific in 2.6 or just newer ALSA - but now (in 2.6) > no > > > > > > /proc/asound/dev is created. It does not matter for devfs case because it > > > > stil creates /dev/snd/... as before. But for non-devfs case initscript > > > assumes that no ALSA should be loaded if /proc/asound/dev does not exist. > > > > Even worse - for 2.4 script wipes out /dev/snd and links it to > > > /proc/asound/dev, thus leaving bogus links when we boot 2.6. So even > fixing > > > > > > script and manually creating /dev/snd/* filew will last until next time > 2.4 > > > > > > is booted. > > > > > > I have no idea how to solve it; anyone with better ALSA knowledge out > > > there? > > > > actually just found this > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/alsa/2.4-patches/ > > and i'll try to merge it in 2.4. > > you might want to make a forward port of > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/alsa/2.4-patches/alsa-zx-proc-devs.dif.gz > > adding device files on procfs, which was removed from > > the recent ALSA release > > > > why would you need that? The original problem is incompatiblility > between old (2.4 kernel) and new (2.6 kernel) ALSA. If you include > new ALSA in 2.4, incompatibility goes away and problem is solved. just intermediate solution until alsa-0.9.6 is merged in the 2.4 kernel, for the long run this is really BAD BAD STUPID idea (sorry) svetljo
