Re: libsasl plugins?

2002-05-03 Thread Ben Reser

On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:25:34AM -0400, Stew Benedict wrote:
> No good reason.  I asked for preferred packagess to fill the last 20M or
> so I had on CD2, and not getting any responses, I arbitrarily grabbed a
> few. For the most part the selection was based on the x86 2CD list.

Yeah well I just didn't get to it before you said you'd finished it
anyway (actually was about to do it when I got the email).  Basically
the issue with libsasl is it's worthless without at least one of the
plugins that go with it.  I'd recommend the loging or the cram module.
Unfortunately, we can't ditch libsasl because postfix requires it.

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless,
whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism
or the holy name of liberty and democracy? - Ghandi




Re: libsasl plugins?

2002-05-03 Thread Stew Benedict


On Fri, 3 May 2002, Ben Reser wrote:

> Is there a point to including libsasl without at least some of the
> plugins that go with it?
> 

No good reason.  I asked for preferred packagess to fill the last 20M or
so I had on CD2, and not getting any responses, I arbitrarily grabbed a
few. For the most part the selection was based on the x86 2CD list.

Stew Benedict

-- 
MandrakeSoft
PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/PPC/FAQ/





libsasl plugins?

2002-05-03 Thread Ben Reser

Is there a point to including libsasl without at least some of the
plugins that go with it?

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless,
whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism
or the holy name of liberty and democracy? - Ghandi