On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 02:57:47 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Occasionally in core-libs we've discussed whether or not to do a pass over 
> the exception classes and proactively add any of four missing convention 
> constructors per java.lang.Throwable (no-arg, string, cause, cause and 
> string). Last time this came up, we decided a wide-scale effort wasn't 
> worthwhile.
> 
> Prompted by some other recent work, I decided to take a quick look at the 
> dual-approach: grep for calls to initCause in java.base and seeing which 
> exception classes repeated were initCaused. Those exception classes are good 
> candidates for cause-taking constructors.
> 
> Two such exception classes area InvalidObjectException and 
> InvalidClassException, along with their superclass ObjectStreamException.
> 
> Please also review the CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8282697

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 104e3cb2
Author:    Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/104e3cb24b4de5512abf9f5491f9c530b26838d3
Stats:     212 lines in 7 files changed: 176 ins; 14 del; 22 mod

8282696: Add constructors taking a cause to InvalidObjectException and 
InvalidClassException

Reviewed-by: lancea

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7711

Reply via email to