JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896

2016-02-16 Thread joe darcy 

Hello,

*sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot 
run run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in 
DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the 
Formatter test template and regenerate the tests:


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/

Actual semantic changes in

test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template
test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java
test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java

Thanks,

-Joe

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896

2016-02-16 Thread Roger Riggs 

+1

Roger

On 2/16/2016 1:35 PM, joe darcy wrote:

Hello,

*sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot 
run run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in 
DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the 
Formatter test template and regenerate the tests:


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/

Actual semantic changes in

test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template
test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java
test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java

Thanks,

-Joe

Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896

2016-02-16 Thread Brian Burkhalter 
+2

On Feb 16, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Roger Riggs  wrote:

> +1
> 
> Roger
> 
> On 2/16/2016 1:35 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> *sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot run 
>> run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in 
>> DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the 
>> Formatter test template and regenerate the tests:
>> 
>>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/
>> 
>> Actual semantic changes in
>> 
>>test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template
>>test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java
>>test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> -Joe
>