JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896
Hello, *sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot run run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the Formatter test template and regenerate the tests: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/ Actual semantic changes in test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java Thanks, -Joe
Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896
+1 Roger On 2/16/2016 1:35 PM, joe darcy wrote: Hello, *sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot run run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the Formatter test template and regenerate the tests: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/ Actual semantic changes in test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java Thanks, -Joe
Re: JDK 9 RFR of JDK-8149981: java/util/Formatter/Basic.java fails after JDK-8149896
+2 On Feb 16, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Roger Riggs wrote: > +1 > > Roger > > On 2/16/2016 1:35 PM, joe darcy wrote: >> Hello, >> >> *sigh* The one set of regression tests related in JDK-8149896 I forgot run >> run before pushing had a dependency on the removed constants in >> DoubleConsts. Please review this straightforward change to fix up the >> Formatter test template and regenerate the tests: >> >>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8149981.0/ >> >> Actual semantic changes in >> >>test/java/util/Formatter/Basic-X.java.template >>test/java/util/Formatter/Basic.java >>test/java/util/Formatter/BasicDouble.java >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Joe >