Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Volker, Sorry for not replying earlier, it was day-off on Friday here... On 25-11-2016 11:32, Volker Simonis wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > we've realized that we have exactly the same problem on Linux/s390 so > I hope you don't mind that I've updated the bug and the webrev to also > include the fix for Linux/s390: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.top/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.jdk/ > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 > > The top-level change stays the same (I've only added the current > reviewers) and for the jdk change I've just added Linux/s390 as > another platform which can compile fdlibm with HIGH optimization. Actually, it's really cool to know that an analysis on PPC64 contributed also to the s390 arch! :) Thanks for providing the updated webrevs. Regards, Gustavo
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Looks good. /Erik On 2016-11-25 14:32, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi Gustavo, we've realized that we have exactly the same problem on Linux/s390 so I hope you don't mind that I've updated the bug and the webrev to also include the fix for Linux/s390: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.top/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.jdk/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 The top-level change stays the same (I've only added the current reviewers) and for the jdk change I've just added Linux/s390 as another platform which can compile fdlibm with HIGH optimization. Thanks, Volker On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote: Hi Erik, On 23-11-2016 12:29, Erik Joelsson wrote: Build changes look ok. In CoreLibraries.gmk, I think it would have been ok to keep the conditional checking (OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH, ppc), but this certainly works too. Thanks a lot for reviewing the change. Regards, Gustavo
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Gustavo, we've realized that we have exactly the same problem on Linux/s390 so I hope you don't mind that I've updated the bug and the webrev to also include the fix for Linux/s390: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.top/ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8170153.jdk/ https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 The top-level change stays the same (I've only added the current reviewers) and for the jdk change I've just added Linux/s390 as another platform which can compile fdlibm with HIGH optimization. Thanks, Volker On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote: > Hi Erik, > > On 23-11-2016 12:29, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> Build changes look ok. >> >> In CoreLibraries.gmk, I think it would have been ok to keep the conditional >> checking (OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH, ppc), but this certainly works too. > > Thanks a lot for reviewing the change. > > > Regards, > Gustavo >
RE: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Gustavo, thanks for providing the webrevs. I have ran the StrictMath jck tests which fail when building with -O3 and without -ffp-contract=off: FailedTests: api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#acos javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.acos_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#asin javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.asin_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#atan javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.atan_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#atan2 javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.atan2_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#cos javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.cos_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#exp javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.exp_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#log javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#sin javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.sin_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#tan javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.tan_test api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#expm1 javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.expm1Tests -TestCaseID ALL api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#log10 javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log10Tests -TestCaseID ALL api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#log1p javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log1pTests -TestCaseID ALL All of them have passed when building with -O3 and -ffp-contract=off (on linuxppc64le). So thumbs up from my side. Thanks and best regards, Martin -Original Message- From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Volker Simonis Sent: Mittwoch, 23. November 2016 15:06 To: Gustavo Romero Cc: build-dev ; ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; Java Core Libs ; hotspot-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation Hi Gustavo, thanks a lot for tracking this down! The change looks good and I a can sponsor it once you get another review from the build group and the FC Extension Request was approved. In general I'd advise to sign the OCTLA [1] to get access to the Java SE TCK [2] as this contains quite a lot of additional conformance tests which can be quite valuable for changes like this. Regards, Volker [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/octla-java-se-8.pdf [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/conformance/JckAccess/ On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote: > Hi, > > Could the following change be reviewed, please? > > webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/ > webrev 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/jdk/ > bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 > > It enables fdlibm optimization on Linux PPC64 LE & BE and hence speeds > up the StrictMath methods (in some cases up to 3x) on that platform. > > On PPC64 fdlibm optimization can be done without precision issues if > floating-point expression contraction is disable, i.e. if the compiler > does not use floating-point multiply-add (FMA). For further details > please refer to gcc > bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 > > No regression was observed on Math and StrictMath tests: > > Passed: java/lang/Math/AbsPositiveZero.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Atan2Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/CeilAndFloorTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/CubeRootTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/DivModTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/ExactArithTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Expm1Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/FusedMultiplyAddTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/HyperbolicTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/HypotTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/IeeeRecommendedTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Log10Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Log1pTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/MinMax.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/MultiplicationTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/PowTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Rint.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/RoundTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/SinCosCornerCasesTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/TanTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/WorstCaseTests.java > Test results: passed: 21 > > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/CubeRootTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/ExactArithTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Expm1Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HyperbolicTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HypotTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log10Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log1pTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/PowTests.java > Test results: passed: 8 > > and also on the following hotspot tests: > > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactLongTest.java > Passed: > compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanit
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Erik, On 23-11-2016 12:29, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Build changes look ok. > > In CoreLibraries.gmk, I think it would have been ok to keep the conditional > checking (OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH, ppc), but this certainly works too. Thanks a lot for reviewing the change. Regards, Gustavo
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Martin, On 23-11-2016 12:38, Doerr, Martin wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > thanks for providing the webrevs. > > I have ran the StrictMath jck tests which fail when building with -O3 and > without -ffp-contract=off: > FailedTests: > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#acos > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.acos_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#asin > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.asin_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#atan > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.atan_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#atan2 > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.atan2_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#cos > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.cos_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#exp > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.exp_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#log > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#sin > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.sin_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/desc.html#tan > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.tan_test > api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#expm1 > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.expm1Tests -TestCaseID ALL > api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#log10 > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log10Tests -TestCaseID ALL > api/java_lang/StrictMath/index.html#log1p > javasoft.sqe.tests.api.java.lang.StrictMath.log1pTests -TestCaseID ALL > > All of them have passed when building with -O3 and -ffp-contract=off (on > linuxppc64le). Thank you very much for running the additional StrictMath jck tests against the change! Best regards, Gustavo
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Volker, On 23-11-2016 12:05, Volker Simonis wrote: > thanks a lot for tracking this down! Happy to contribute :) > The change looks good and I a can sponsor it once you get another > review from the build group and the FC Extension Request was approved. Thanks a lot for sponsoring it! > In general I'd advise to sign the OCTLA [1] to get access to the Java > SE TCK [2] as this contains quite a lot of additional conformance > tests which can be quite valuable for changes like this. > > Regards, > Volker > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/octla-java-se-8.pdf > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/conformance/JckAccess/ Right. I'll check the documentation and find a way to get access to the TCK. Best regards, Gustavo
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Build changes look ok. In CoreLibraries.gmk, I think it would have been ok to keep the conditional checking (OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_ARCH, ppc), but this certainly works too. /Erik On 2016-11-22 01:43, Gustavo Romero wrote: Hi, Could the following change be reviewed, please? webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/ webrev 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/jdk/ bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 It enables fdlibm optimization on Linux PPC64 LE & BE and hence speeds up the StrictMath methods (in some cases up to 3x) on that platform. On PPC64 fdlibm optimization can be done without precision issues if floating-point expression contraction is disable, i.e. if the compiler does not use floating-point multiply-add (FMA). For further details please refer to gcc bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 No regression was observed on Math and StrictMath tests: Passed: java/lang/Math/AbsPositiveZero.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Atan2Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/CeilAndFloorTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/CubeRootTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/DivModTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/ExactArithTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Expm1Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/FusedMultiplyAddTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/HyperbolicTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/HypotTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/IeeeRecommendedTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Log10Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Log1pTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/MinMax.java Passed: java/lang/Math/MultiplicationTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/PowTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Rint.java Passed: java/lang/Math/RoundTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/SinCosCornerCasesTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/TanTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/WorstCaseTests.java Test results: passed: 21 Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/CubeRootTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/ExactArithTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Expm1Tests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HyperbolicTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HypotTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log10Tests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log1pTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/PowTests.java Test results: passed: 8 and also on the following hotspot tests: Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactICondTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIRepeatTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/CompareTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactITest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactLTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/GVNTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactITest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactLTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactICondTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIRepeatTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NestedMathExactTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/
Re: RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi Gustavo, thanks a lot for tracking this down! The change looks good and I a can sponsor it once you get another review from the build group and the FC Extension Request was approved. In general I'd advise to sign the OCTLA [1] to get access to the Java SE TCK [2] as this contains quite a lot of additional conformance tests which can be quite valuable for changes like this. Regards, Volker [1] http://openjdk.java.net/legal/octla-java-se-8.pdf [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/conformance/JckAccess/ On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote: > Hi, > > Could the following change be reviewed, please? > > webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/ > webrev 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/jdk/ > bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 > > It enables fdlibm optimization on Linux PPC64 LE & BE and hence speeds up the > StrictMath methods (in some cases up to 3x) on that platform. > > On PPC64 fdlibm optimization can be done without precision issues if > floating-point expression contraction is disable, i.e. if the compiler does > not > use floating-point multiply-add (FMA). For further details please refer to gcc > bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 > > No regression was observed on Math and StrictMath tests: > > Passed: java/lang/Math/AbsPositiveZero.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Atan2Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/CeilAndFloorTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/CubeRootTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/DivModTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/ExactArithTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Expm1Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/FusedMultiplyAddTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/HyperbolicTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/HypotTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/IeeeRecommendedTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Log10Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Log1pTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/MinMax.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/MultiplicationTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/PowTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/Rint.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/RoundTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/SinCosCornerCasesTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/TanTests.java > Passed: java/lang/Math/WorstCaseTests.java > Test results: passed: 21 > > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/CubeRootTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/ExactArithTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Expm1Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HyperbolicTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HypotTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log10Tests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log1pTests.java > Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/PowTests.java > Test results: passed: 8 > > and also on the following hotspot tests: > > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactIntTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactLongTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactICondTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoadTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoopDependentTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactINonConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIRepeatTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLNonConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/CompareTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactITest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactLTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/GVNTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactITest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactLTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactICondTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoadTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoopDependentTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactINonConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIRepeatTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactLConstantTest.java > Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExact
RFR(s) 8170153: PPC64: Poor StrictMath performance due to non-optimized compilation
Hi, Could the following change be reviewed, please? webrev 1/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/ webrev 2/2: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8170153/jdk/ bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170153 It enables fdlibm optimization on Linux PPC64 LE & BE and hence speeds up the StrictMath methods (in some cases up to 3x) on that platform. On PPC64 fdlibm optimization can be done without precision issues if floating-point expression contraction is disable, i.e. if the compiler does not use floating-point multiply-add (FMA). For further details please refer to gcc bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78386 No regression was observed on Math and StrictMath tests: Passed: java/lang/Math/AbsPositiveZero.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Atan2Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/CeilAndFloorTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/CubeRootTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/DivModTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/ExactArithTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Expm1Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/FusedMultiplyAddTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/HyperbolicTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/HypotTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/IeeeRecommendedTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Log10Tests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Log1pTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/MinMax.java Passed: java/lang/Math/MultiplicationTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/PowTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/Rint.java Passed: java/lang/Math/RoundTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/SinCosCornerCasesTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/TanTests.java Passed: java/lang/Math/WorstCaseTests.java Test results: passed: 21 Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/CubeRootTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/ExactArithTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Expm1Tests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HyperbolicTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/HypotTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log10Tests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/Log1pTests.java Passed: java/lang/StrictMath/PowTests.java Test results: passed: 8 and also on the following hotspot tests: Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/AddExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/DecrementExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/IncrementExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/MultiplyExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/NegateExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactIntTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/sanity/SubtractExactLongTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactICondTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactIRepeatTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/AddExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/CompareTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactITest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/DecExactLTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/GVNTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactITest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/IncExactLTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactICondTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactIRepeatTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/MulExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactILoadTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactILoopDependentTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactINonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactLConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NegExactLNonConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/NestedMathExactTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/SplitThruPhiTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/SubExactICondTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/SubExactIConstantTest.java Passed: compiler/intrinsics/mathexact/SubExactILoadTest.java Passed: c
