Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread John R Rose
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:22:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

Marked as reviewed by jrose (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread Lance Andersen
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:22:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread Iris Clark
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:22:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread Roger Riggs
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:22:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread Daniel Fuchs
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 11:22:27 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

LGTM

-

Marked as reviewed by dfuchs (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v2]

2021-09-13 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:20:11 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert two fixes

Thanks to those who reviewed this PR. Since I posted it, I've found three more 
occurrences of _insure_ used in the sense of _ensure_: two in the 
`java.io.Object*Stream` area and one in the `java.util.Currency` class. I 
decided to fix those in this PR, which now needs to be (re)reviewed. Thanks!

There are more occurrences of _insure_, which I didn't touch. Some of them are 
in java.sql, java.sql.rowset and java.desktop. In the latter, _insure_ even 
crept into method names.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v3]

2021-09-13 Thread Pavel Rappo
> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Use "ensure" instead of "insure"

-

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475/files/9a9deee1..4b33fb94

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=5475=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=5475=01-02

  Stats: 3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5475/head:pull/5475

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v2]

2021-09-11 Thread Lance Andersen
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:20:11 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert two fixes

Marked as reviewed by lancea (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v2]

2021-09-10 Thread Iris Clark
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 23:20:11 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert two fixes

Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v2]

2021-09-10 Thread Pavel Rappo
> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Revert two fixes

-

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475/files/b90d1556..9a9deee1

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=5475=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=5475=00-01

  Stats: 3 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 3 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5475/head:pull/5475

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module [v2]

2021-09-10 Thread Pavel Rappo
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:52:36 GMT, John R Rose  wrote:

>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Revert two fixes
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/channels/FileChannel.java line 567:
> 
>> 565:  *  If {@code true} then this method is required to force 
>> changes
>> 566:  *  to both the file's content and metadata to be written to
>> 567:  *  storage; otherwise, it needs only force content changes 
>> to be
> 
> (same as previous comment:  the suggested fix makes the English *less* 
> correct)

Reverted both in 9a9deee; thanks.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

2021-09-10 Thread Florent Guillaume
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:51:45 GMT, John R Rose  wrote:

>> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/channels/AsynchronousFileChannel.java 
> line 399:
> 
>> 397:  *  If {@code true} then this method is required to force 
>> changes
>> 398:  *  to both the file's content and metadata to be written to
>> 399:  *  storage; otherwise, it needs only force content changes 
>> to be
> 
> This is a correct though rare use of subjunctive mood:  One need not change 
> it.
> However, if be desired that we change the mood to indicative, I suggest s/it 
> need only force/it only needs to force/.

(_it need only force_ is not really subjunctive mood, but rather usage as a 
modal auxiliary, see https://english.stackexchange.com/a/297235)

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


Re: RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

2021-09-10 Thread John R Rose
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:16:19 GMT, Pavel Rappo  wrote:

> 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

Approved, except for two changes commented above: the original "it need only 
force" is correct usage, and "it needs only force" is not good usage, but "it 
only needs to force" would be clearer and also correct.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/channels/AsynchronousFileChannel.java line 
399:

> 397:  *  If {@code true} then this method is required to force 
> changes
> 398:  *  to both the file's content and metadata to be written to
> 399:  *  storage; otherwise, it needs only force content changes 
> to be

This is a correct though rare use of subjunctive mood:  One need not change it.
However, if be desired that we change the mood to indicative, I suggest s/it 
need only force/it only needs to force/.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/channels/FileChannel.java line 567:

> 565:  *  If {@code true} then this method is required to force 
> changes
> 566:  *  to both the file's content and metadata to be written to
> 567:  *  storage; otherwise, it needs only force content changes 
> to be

(same as previous comment:  the suggested fix makes the English *less* correct)

-

Marked as reviewed by jrose (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475


RFR: 8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

2021-09-10 Thread Pavel Rappo
8273616: Fix trivial doc typos in the java.base module

-

Commit messages:
 - Initial commit

Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=5475=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8273616
  Stats: 55 lines in 34 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 55 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/5475/head:pull/5475

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5475