Re: RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2014-01-02 Thread Lance Andersen - Oracle
Hi Serge,
On Dec 20, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Serge wrote:

 Hi all.
 
 Please review a second fix
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.03/
 
 for
 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712
 
 I deleted part of java/sql/package.html,

I did not see the section below deleted, perhaps the change did not get pushed 
to where you generated the webrev from?
 and replaced br/ to br for compliance with html 3.2
 
 
 On 12/05/2013 10:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:
 Hi Serge
 
 
 
 This looks OK.
 
 
 
 For
 
 --- old/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html  2013-12-05 
 15:08:50.587885460 +
 +++ new/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html  2013-12-05 
 15:08:50.435885464 +
 
 Please remove the following
 
 
 Package Specification
 
  . Specification of the JDBC 4.0 API
 Related Documentation
 
  . Getting Started--overviews of the major interfaces
  . Chapters on the JDBC API--from the online version of The Java 
 Tutorial Continued
  . JDBCTMAPI Tutorial and Reference, Third Edition-- a complete 
 reference and tutorial for the JDBC 3.0 API
 
 
 
 The above links keep breaking now that we are off of java.sun.com
 
 And I agree with roger, please use br
 
 
 Alan, yes I can look to clean up some of the formatting crud for Java SE 9 
 once we have access to the workspace
 
 Thank you for doing this Serge.
 
 Best
 Lance
 On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
 
 On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote:
 Hi all,
 please review the fix
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ 
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/
 for
 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712
 
 This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
 not affect the appearance of the documentation.
 The removal of the p tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure 
 about the addition of br/ to the package docs (is that needed?).
 
 Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the 
 formatting in the javadoc comments is all over the place 
 (java.sql.Connection is one example). It might be good to clean that up 
 once the jdk9 project is open for business.
 
 -Alan
 
 
 
 Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
 Oracle Java Engineering
 1 Network Drive
 Burlington, MA 01803
 lance.ander...@oracle.com
 
 


Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com



Re: RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2013-12-20 Thread Serge

Hi all.

Please review a second fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.03/

for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712

I deleted part of java/sql/package.html,
and replaced br/ to br for compliance with html 3.2


On 12/05/2013 10:39 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:

Hi Serge



This looks OK.



For

--- old/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.587885460 
+
+++ new/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.435885464 
+

Please remove the following


Package Specification

. Specification of the JDBC 4.0 API
Related Documentation

. Getting Started--overviews of the major interfaces
. Chapters on the JDBC API--from the online version of The Java 
Tutorial Continued
. JDBCTMAPI Tutorial and Reference, Third Edition-- a complete 
reference and tutorial for the JDBC 3.0 API



The above links keep breaking now that we are off of java.sun.com

And I agree with roger, please use br


Alan, yes I can look to clean up some of the formatting crud for Java SE 9 once 
we have access to the workspace

Thank you for doing this Serge.

Best
Lance
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:


On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote:

Hi all,
please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712

This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
not affect the appearance of the documentation.

The removal of the p tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure about the 
addition of br/ to the package docs (is that needed?).

Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the formatting 
in the javadoc comments is all over the place (java.sql.Connection is one 
example). It might be good to clean that up once the jdk9 project is open for 
business.

-Alan




Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com





RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2013-12-05 Thread Serge

Hi all,
please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/  
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712

This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
not affect the appearance of the documentation.

Best regards,
Serge V. Lugovoy



Re: RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2013-12-05 Thread roger riggs

Hi Serge,

A fine point but in java/sql/package.html;  the self closing tag br/
is not supported in HTML 3.2 (defined in the DOCTYPE)).
Simply br is sufficient.

The rest looks fine to me.  (Not a Reviewer)

Roger


On 12/5/2013 12:25 PM, Serge wrote:

Hi all,
please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/

for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712

This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
not affect the appearance of the documentation.

Best regards,
Serge V. Lugovoy





Re: RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2013-12-05 Thread Alan Bateman

On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote:

Hi all,
please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/

for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712

This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
not affect the appearance of the documentation.
The removal of the p tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure 
about the addition of br/ to the package docs (is that needed?).


Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the 
formatting in the javadoc comments is all over the place 
(java.sql.Connection is one example). It might be good to clean that up 
once the jdk9 project is open for business.


-Alan



Re: RFR: JDK-8028712 : Tidy warnings cleanup for java.sql package

2013-12-05 Thread Lance Andersen - Oracle
Hi Serge



This looks OK.



For

--- old/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.587885460 
+
+++ new/src/share/classes/java/sql/package.html 2013-12-05 15:08:50.435885464 
+

Please remove the following


Package Specification

• Specification of the JDBC 4.0 API
Related Documentation

• Getting Started--overviews of the major interfaces
• Chapters on the JDBC API--from the online version of The Java 
Tutorial Continued
• JDBCTMAPI Tutorial and Reference, Third Edition-- a complete 
reference and tutorial for the JDBC 3.0 API



The above links keep breaking now that we are off of java.sun.com

And I agree with roger, please use br


Alan, yes I can look to clean up some of the formatting crud for Java SE 9 once 
we have access to the workspace

Thank you for doing this Serge.

Best
Lance
On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:

 On 05/12/2013 17:25, Serge wrote:
 Hi all,
 please review the fix
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8028712/webrev.02/ 
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eyan/8028712/webrev.02/
 for
 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028712
 
 This patch cleanup tidy warnings for generated html documentation, and do
 not affect the appearance of the documentation.
 The removal of the p tags seems okay. The only thing that I'm not sure 
 about the addition of br/ to the package docs (is that needed?).
 
 Lance - while scanning this patch then it appears that some of the formatting 
 in the javadoc comments is all over the place (java.sql.Connection is one 
 example). It might be good to clean that up once the jdk9 project is open for 
 business.
 
 -Alan
 


Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com