Re: RFR: 8268768: idea.sh has been updated in surprising and incompatible ways

2021-06-15 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:04:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore  
wrote:

> As the title says (please also refer to the JBS issue which describes all the 
> issues in more details), the IDE support for IntelliJ has been updated with 
> many enhancements as part of a seemingly innocuous "path handling" fix. The 
> IDE doesn't appear to be usable in the same way it was in the past and many 
> functionalities have been broken as a result (including support for jtreg 
> test execution using the plugin).
> 
> For the above reasons, I'm reverting the plugin and idea.sh code to last 
> known working version. Any _targeted_ fix can be re-applied after the revert. 
> Larger enhancements need to be discussed in the proper venue:
> 
> https://openjdk.java.net/groups/ide-support/

closing - and recreating against 17

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4492


Re: RFR: 8268768: idea.sh has been updated in surprising and incompatible ways

2021-06-15 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:35:14 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore  
wrote:

> I can push to 17 if desired, but I'll need a new PR for that

pushing to 17 would be nice; the script is equally broken and unusable there.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4492


Re: RFR: 8268768: idea.sh has been updated in surprising and incompatible ways

2021-06-15 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:04:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore  
wrote:

> As the title says (please also refer to the JBS issue which describes all the 
> issues in more details), the IDE support for IntelliJ has been updated with 
> many enhancements as part of a seemingly innocuous "path handling" fix. The 
> IDE doesn't appear to be usable in the same way it was in the past and many 
> functionalities have been broken as a result (including support for jtreg 
> test execution using the plugin).
> 
> For the above reasons, I'm reverting the plugin and idea.sh code to last 
> known working version. Any _targeted_ fix can be re-applied after the revert. 
> Larger enhancements need to be discussed in the proper venue:
> 
> https://openjdk.java.net/groups/ide-support/

I can push to 17 if desired, but I'll need a new PR for that

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4492


Re: RFR: 8268768: idea.sh has been updated in surprising and incompatible ways

2021-06-15 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:04:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore  
wrote:

> As the title says (please also refer to the JBS issue which describes all the 
> issues in more details), the IDE support for IntelliJ has been updated with 
> many enhancements as part of a seemingly innocuous "path handling" fix. The 
> IDE doesn't appear to be usable in the same way it was in the past and many 
> functionalities have been broken as a result (including support for jtreg 
> test execution using the plugin).
> 
> For the above reasons, I'm reverting the plugin and idea.sh code to last 
> known working version. Any _targeted_ fix can be re-applied after the revert. 
> Larger enhancements need to be discussed in the proper venue:
> 
> https://openjdk.java.net/groups/ide-support/

Does this need backported to 17 (or pushed to 17 and "back"ported into 18)?

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4492


Re: RFR: 8268768: idea.sh has been updated in surprising and incompatible ways

2021-06-15 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:04:56 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore  
wrote:

> As the title says (please also refer to the JBS issue which describes all the 
> issues in more details), the IDE support for IntelliJ has been updated with 
> many enhancements as part of a seemingly innocuous "path handling" fix. The 
> IDE doesn't appear to be usable in the same way it was in the past and many 
> functionalities have been broken as a result (including support for jtreg 
> test execution using the plugin).
> 
> For the above reasons, I'm reverting the plugin and idea.sh code to last 
> known working version. Any _targeted_ fix can be re-applied after the revert. 
> Larger enhancements need to be discussed in the proper venue:
> 
> https://openjdk.java.net/groups/ide-support/

Agreed, let's back up and reevaluate.

-

Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4492