Re: problem with completion notification from block movement
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 20:06 -0800, jason hadoop wrote: > This can be made significantly worse by your underlying host file > system and the disks that support it. Oh, yes, we know... It was a late-realized mistake just yesterday that we weren't using noatime on that cluster's slaves. The attached graph is instructive. We have our nightly-rotated logs for DataNode all the way back to when this test cluster was created in November. This morning on one node, I sampled the first 10 BlockReport scan lines from each day's log, up through the current hour today, and handed it to gnuplot to graph. The seriously erratic behavior that begins around the 900K-1M point is very disturbing. Immediate solutions for us include noatime, nodiratime, BIOS upgrade on the discs, and eliminating enough small files (blocks) in DFS to get the total count below 400K.
Re: problem with completion notification from block movement
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 17:58 -0800, jason hadoop wrote: > The Datanode's use multiple threads with locking and one of the > assumptions is that the block report (1ce per hour by default) takes > little time. The datanode will pause while the block report is running > and if it happens to take a while weird things start to happen. Thank you for responding, this is very informative for us. Having looked through the source code with a co-worker regarding periodic scan and then checking the logs once again, we find that we are finding reports of this sort: BlockReport of 1158499 blocks got processed in 308860 msecs BlockReport of 1159840 blocks got processed in 237925 msecs BlockReport of 1161274 blocks got processed in 177853 msecs BlockReport of 1162408 blocks got processed in 285094 msecs BlockReport of 1164194 blocks got processed in 184478 msecs BlockReport of 1165673 blocks got processed in 226401 msecs The 3rd of these exactly straddles the particular example timeline I discussed in my original email about this question. I suspect I'll find more of the same as I look through other related errors. --karl
problem with completion notification from block movement
We have a small test cluster, a double master (NameNode+JobTracker) plus 2 slaves, running 0.18.1. We are seeing an intermittent problem where our application logs failures out of DFSClient, thus: 2009-01-30 01:59:42,072 WARN org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient: DFSOutputStream ResponseProcessor exception for block blk_7603130349014268849_2349933java.net.SocketTimeoutException: 66000 millis timeout while waiting for channel to be ready for read. ch : java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/10.0.10.102:54700 remote=/10.0.10.108:50010] at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketIOWithTimeout.doIO(SocketIOWithTimeout.java:162) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:150) at org.apache.hadoop.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:123) at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:176) at java.io.DataInputStream.readLong(DataInputStream.java:380) at org.apache.hadoop.dfs.DFSClient$DFSOutputStream $ResponseProcessor.run(DFSClient.java:2044) (Apologies for paste formatting. I hate Evolution.) Our application here is our "JobConsole," which is responsible for taking notifications from an external data-generating application: The external app scribbles files into DFS and then tells JobConsole about them. JobConsole submits jobs to crunch that data in response to the external app's notifications of data availability. JobConsole runs on the master node. Chasing that block identifier through our JobConsole log plus the DataNode logs on the slaves, we have an odd timeline, which is this: 01:58:32slave (.108, above): receiving blk from master (.102) 01:58:35other slave (.107): receiving blk from .108 01:58:36.107: received blk 01:58:38.107: terminate PacketResponder 01:59:42JobConsole (.102): 66s t.o. + Error Recovery (above) 01:59:42.107: invoke recoverBlock on that blk 02:01:15.108: received blk + terminate PacketResponder 03:03:24.108: deleting blk, from Linux pathname in DFS storage What's clear from this is that .108 got the block quickly, because it was in a position immediately to send a copy to .107, which responded promptly enough to say that it was in possession. But .108's DataNode sat on the block for a full 3 minutes before announcing what appears to have been ordinary completion and responder termination. After the first minute-plus of that long period, JobConsole gave up and did a recovery operation, which appears to work. If .108's DataNode sent a notification when it finally logged completed reception, no doubt there was nobody listening for it any more. What's particularly of interest to us is that the NameNode log shows us that the data being moved is job.jar: 2009-01-30 01:58:32,353 INFO org.apache.hadoop.dfs.StateChange: BLOCK* NameSystem.allocateBlock: /usr/local/rinera/hadoop/hadoop-runtime/0/mapred/system/job_200901291752_3021/job.jar. blk_7603130349014268849_2349933 Note block name and timestamp. Does anyone else have knowledge or history with such glitches? We've recently begun seeing a number of problems in communication between task management processes and DFS that previously had not been seen, and we're trying to nail down where they're coming from, without success.
Re: question: NameNode hanging on startup as it intends to leave safe mode
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 11:52 -0800, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: > This is probably related to HADOOP-4795. Thanx for the observation and reference. However, my sense is that the bug report you reference reflects NameNode going into an infloop spin, whereas the situation we have faced concerns NameNode being stuck/hung, as though in a resource embrace error: Using no CPU, reacting to no outside events other than to accept incoming connections without proceeding to handle them. Can your referenced bug manifest itself as a NameNode hang as well as a spin?
question: NameNode hanging on startup as it intends to leave safe mode
We have a cluster comprised of 21 nodes holding a total capacity of about 55T where we have had a problem twice in the last couple weeks on startup of NameNode. We are running 0.18.1. DFS space is currently just below the halfway point of actual occupation, about 25T. Symptom is that there is normal startup logging on NameNode's part, where it self-analyzes its expected DFS content, reports #files known, and begins to accept reports from slaves' DataNodes about blocks they hold. During this time, NameNode is in safe mode pending adequate block discovery from slaves. As the fraction of reported blocks rises, eventually it hits the required 0.9990 threshold and announces that it will leave safe mode in 30 seconds. The problem occurs when, at the point of logging "0 seconds to leave safe mode," NameNode hangs: It uses no more CPU; it logs nothing further; it stops responding on its port 50070 web interface; "hadoop fs" commands report no contact with NameNode; "netstat -atp" shows a number of open connections on 9000 and 50070, indicating the connections are being accepted, but NameNode never processes them. This has happened twice in the last 2 weeks and it has us fairly concerned. Both times, it has been adequate simply to start over again, and NameNode successfully comes to life the 2nd time around. Is anyone else familiar with this sort of hang, and do you know of any solutions?
