Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
On 08/19/2011 01:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Once we have the parse-datetimeT patch, I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, so we're overdue. If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see addressed first, please let us know. Do we want to wait for the gnulib workaround for broken AIX 7.1 fstatat? That looks like it will be soon in coming. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/19/2011 01:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Once we have the parse-datetimeT patch, >> I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. >> It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, >> so we're overdue. >> >> If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see >> addressed first, please let us know. > > Do we want to wait for the gnulib workaround for broken AIX 7.1 > fstatat? That looks like it will be soon in coming. Sure. In any case I'll probably make a snapshot first and then wait a day or two before the real release.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
On 08/19/2011 01:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Once we have the parse-datetimeT patch, I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, so we're overdue. If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see addressed first, please let us know. Hmm, as long as we're releasing for an fts improvement, I wonder if it would be worth getting du --noatime (and friends) implemented, to take advantage of gnulib's FTS_NOATIME. I mentioned doing that a while ago when I made the gnulib change, but guess I haven't gotten to it yet. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/19/2011 01:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Once we have the parse-datetimeT patch, >> I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. >> It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, >> so we're overdue. >> >> If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see >> addressed first, please let us know. > > Hmm, as long as we're releasing for an fts improvement, I wonder if it > would be worth getting du --noatime (and friends) implemented, to take > advantage of gnulib's FTS_NOATIME. I mentioned doing that a while ago > when I made the gnulib change, but guess I haven't gotten to it yet. There's no hurry to add that, as far as I'm concerned, but if you want to do it now I won't object.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
On 08/19/2011 08:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Once we have the parse-datetime T patch, > I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. > It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, > so we're overdue. > > If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see > addressed first, please let us know. I'd liked to see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9321 looked into before release (segfaults in sort) cheers, Pádraig.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 08/19/2011 08:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Once we have the parse-datetime T patch, >> I'll be ready to release coreutils-8.13. >> It's been almost 4 months and over 170 commits since 8.12, >> so we're overdue. >> >> If anyone can point out reported problems that they'd like to see >> addressed first, please let us know. > > I'd liked to see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9321 > looked into before release (segfaults in sort) So would I. I've just replied there.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:33:29AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: Pádraig Brady wrote: I'd liked to see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9321 looked into before release (segfaults in sort) So would I. I've just replied there. I am seeing no evidence of the problems on another machine, so must assume this is local to the original hardware. Please close #9321. -- Andras Salamon and...@dns.net
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
Andras Salamon wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:33:29AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: >>Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> I'd liked to see http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9321 >>> looked into before release (segfaults in sort) >> >>So would I. I've just replied there. > > I am seeing no evidence of the problems on another machine, so must > assume this is local to the original hardware. Please close #9321. Thanks for letting us know. I've closed it and tagged it "notabug". FYI, you could have closed it yourself by sending this message to 9321-d...@debbugs.gnu.org. An alternative (what I did) is to reply to the thread and to Bcc the bug-tracking control address, cont...@debbugs.gnu.org including these lines at the top of the message: tags 9321 + notabug close 9321 thanks
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
only 2 minor ones (I think I should've started a new thread). * [PATCH] tests: introduce make targets check-expensive and check-very-expensive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00067.html * [PATCH] tests: mention targets check-expensive/check-very-expensive in test logs http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00069.html Bye, Berny On 09/08/2011 04:15 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: I expect to update to the latest in gnulib, tag, test-once-more and release coreutils-8.13, starting in about an hour. If anyone knows of something that belongs but that is not yet pushed, please reply here.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
Bernhard Voelker wrote: > only 2 minor ones (I think I should've started a new thread). > > * [PATCH] tests: introduce make targets check-expensive and > check-very-expensive > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00067.html > > * [PATCH] tests: mention targets check-expensive/check-very-expensive in test > logs > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00069.html Thanks. Those can obviously wait until after the release. Next time, please omit the signed-off-by lines. If you have chosen to enable that option globally, please run something like this in your coreutils directory: git config format.signoff false Then you (and I!) won't be bothered about it again.
Re: ready for coreutils-8.13
On 09/08/2011 04:46 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Bernhard Voelker wrote: only 2 minor ones (I think I should've started a new thread). * [PATCH] tests: introduce make targets check-expensive and check-very-expensive http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00067.html * [PATCH] tests: mention targets check-expensive/check-very-expensive in test logs http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2011-08/msg00069.html Thanks. Those can obviously wait until after the release. sure. Next time, please omit the signed-off-by lines. If you have chosen to enable that option globally, please run something like this in your coreutils directory: git config format.signoff false Then you (and I!) won't be bothered about it again. sorry about that. That was before you told me that the first (or second? ;-) time, but now, I'll remember. Thanks. Berny
