Re: [Courier-imap] New releases of Courier packages
Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Christopher E. Brown writes: > >> >> I have run into a build issue with courier-imap 4.4.0 on FreeBSD 6.2, >> building on a Slackware 12 system works fine. FreeBSD system is up to >> date patch/ports wise and 4.3.1 builds fine. >> >> >> Fails with >> >> /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. >>-g -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -MT maildirshared.lo -MD -MP -MF >> .deps/maildirshared.Tpo -c -o maildirshared.lo maildirshared.c >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -g -O2 -Wall -I./.. -I.. -MT >> maildirshared.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/maildirshared.Tpo -c >> maildirshared.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/maildirshared.o >> maildirshared.c:360: warning: "struct dbobj" declared inside parameter >> list > > I'm pretty sure this is the same build problem that Sergey reported. > Please try the 20080714 build: http://www.courier-mta.org/download.php#imap > > If this one-line fix also fixes your problem, I'll push it out as 4.4.1. I have not have a chance to run everything through the full paces yet, but it builds/installs clean now. -- Christopher E. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> desk (907) 550-8393 cell (907) 632-8492 IP Engineer - ACS - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ ___ Courier-imap mailing list Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
Re: [Courier-imap] New releases of Courier packages
Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 03:00:39AM -0800, Christopher E. Brown wrote: >> I have run into a build issue with courier-imap 4.4.0 on FreeBSD 6.2, >> building on a Slackware 12 system works fine. > > That would imply the FreeBSD port is broken then? I was going to say it's > maybe worth dropping a line to the maintainer and/or to ports@ > > But a quick look at CVS seems to show that the current port Makefile is for > 4.3.1: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/courier-imap/Makefile?rev=1.125;content-type=text%2Fplain > > So if you modified the port's Makefile yourself, making it point to a > different version of courier-imap than the port was written for, well, you > get to keep the pieces :-) > > You could try compiling directly from the source tarball. You may need to > install a recent version of db first. If you can make that work, then you > can work out how the port needs to be changed to make it compatible with > 4.4.0. > > Regards, > Brian. Lets please assume I am not a total idiot. This is clean unpatched src from the download site, no ports tree involved. The same tarball that builds perfectly on my workstation but not on the testing system for our mail platform. -- ---- Christopher E. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> desk (907) 550-8393 cell (907) 632-8492 IP Engineer - ACS - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Courier-imap mailing list Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
Re: [Courier-imap] New releases of Courier packages
parsing of email addresses with backslashes. > > > > > > - > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > > > > > ___ > Courier-imap mailing list > Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap -- Christopher E. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> desk (907) 550-8393 cell (907) 632-8492 IP Engineer - ACS - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Courier-imap mailing list Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
Re: [Courier-imap] Large Subfolder Problem
And those of us with better than a TB of mail for more than 100K accounts serviced by a rack worth of load balanced servers and a HA NFS infrastructure would be SOL. True Maildir without all the indexing addins (like Cyrus started with) is NFS safe and scales. You take a hit up front, but you gain it back in the ability to have dozens of servers, where any server can handle any mailbox, including multiple servers accessing the box at the same time. (As it happens the IMAP client I am using now has 5 sessions up, each to a separate server the the LB and all accessing the same account.) We run courier *because* it uses true Maildir without any index based acceleration. That being said, I am working with thunderbird, in an account with 3 - 5 thousand messages per folder across a few dozen folders does well. The testbed install in a generic single CPU Opteron at 2Ghz, 1G RAM and a single 300G SATA drive. Last time I was getting complaints I spent most of a day pushing messages around with 35,000 messages per folder without issue. (Turns out the complaints were about an account with 230,000 messages in the inbox). Simon wrote: > On 5/13/2008, Sam Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I've had this problem as well. Thunderbird starts choking when more than a >> few thousand messages are there. Outlook 2003 or 2007 can handle this load >> however -- given enough time to download the headers. > > When using courier-imap, yes, Ive seen this too... > > But one client, where some users have 20K+ message folders, but who > switched to dovecot, do *not* have this problem, once dovecot has built > its indexes. In fact, it takes less time for dovecot to index a 20k+ > folder than it does for courier-imap to serve up a folder with 5k messages. > > Once the indexes are built - well, dovecot just leaves courier in the > dust... sorry Sam, but it is true, and you have said more than once in > the past that you have no intention of adding an indexing feature to > courier-imap... why, I have no idea... > > And dovecot 1.1 is even considerably faster still. > > There are still some features that dovecot lacks (but those are being > added fairly quickly), but even so, I'm migrating all of my clients to > dovecot now and advising anyone I talk to to use it instead. > > - > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Courier-imap mailing list > Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap -- Christopher E. Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> desk (907) 550-8393 cell (907) 632-8492 IP Engineer - ACS - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Courier-imap mailing list Courier-imap@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
