Re: [Coworking] Re: Getting rid of the co-working hyphen

2014-09-19 Thread oren.salo...@gmail.com
I'm with Marius on this one. 

I think the important thing here is to get us in the dictionary with the 
spelling we use. 

To me, the spelling issue has always been indicative of a bigger thing, 
which is official recognition as part of the English language. 

After 10 years, I think the movement has earned it. 

William, how would you feel if everyone started calling you Bill or 
Will-iam? What if the difference between Will-iam and William was just in 
written language and not in speech? You even stated that the reason you 
spell it coworking is out of respect for the rest of us that have all 
settled on coworking (you even prefer co-working!). That's all we're asking 
of journalists in this case. And if they're denying our requests on the 
basis of being or not being in the dictionary, then let's get in the 
dictionary. 

Also Derek, the cowering autocorrect annoys me too! It never learns! 




On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:47:01 PM UTC-5, Marius Amado-Alves 
wrote:

 FWIW, I agree with Will's arguments except the cow one.

 To summarize, the spelling is irrelevant, because there is only one 
 coworking, irrespectively of how it is spelt. As Will points out, working 
 with others in a company is never referred to as coworking.

 Nevertheless, I think there is interest in diccionarizing the terms. (And 
 then, while we're at it, with the preferred spelling? It would be 
 interesting to watch what happens to the guides.)


-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Re: Getting rid of the co-working hyphen

2014-09-19 Thread Will Bennis
Hi Oren,

I appreciate your reply about this!

Actually, my name is Will, not William, damnit!!! :

But I don't think this is really the same.

First, coworking isn't a company name or a given name / proper noun. It's
not your name or my name. It's not even the movement's name. If personal
computing became just computing, what would you think if Apple or
Microsoft or a handful of influential early players in the personal
computing industry campaigned against the change and said that we can't
change their name, and that it was as though their given names were being
mis-spelled? I'd personally think they should leave the English language
alone and that it wasn't the role of people in an industry to try to manage
what have become common nouns in the English language. I have run a
coworking space for more than 4 years now. I care what you call my space or
what you call me and I care about coworking, but the idea that spelling
coworking differently from how people who run coworking spaces think it
should be spelled, or that misspelling is like misspelling a proper noun
seems to me like a stretch.

Second, to the extent the name is owned by the community of coworking space
owners, or at least we have a meaningful stake in it (which I think we do),
then who are *we*? You write that after 10 years, the coworking movement
has earned it and that the rest of us have all settled on coworking. But
I don't think that's true. I see new coworking spaces all the time that put
a hyphen in the term. As I wrote in the previous email, my
(unsubstantiated) hypothesis is that there's really a pretty small group of
coworking space owners who care about coworking being spelled without a
hyphen. I've never seen poll results and I doubt the question has even been
put to a wide audience of coworking space owners (and presumably members).
Even within the industry I'd guess the vast majority don't care (if there
were an option included in the poll), and I wouldn't be at all surprised if
an international poll of coworking space owners and members showed that the
majority even thought the better spelling would be WITH a hyphen. Why
wouldn't you have heard that? The same reason I almost didn't make the last
post in the first place: the other side (the side that would prefer a
hyphen or just doesn't care), doesn't have a horse in the race, because for
that side language is organic and functional and they don't see themselves
as owning the name or as there being a meaningful difference in whether
it's spelled with or without a hyphen. (To be clear, I have no idea about
the other side or what justifications might be; I've never seen any data
on this; but it also wouldn't surprise me). And the name coworking belongs
to a much wider audience than just us coworking space owners by now, just
as personal computing belongs to a much wider audience than Microsoft or
Apple. And the Internet (or now internet) belongs to a much wider audience
than the people who originally coined the name. That's a sign of the
maturity of the word, and something to be proud of as a movement. Not
something to fight against.

Third, even if we were a coherent community who almost universally agreed
that spelling it without a hyphen was superior, wouldn't it be good to
examine the counter-arguments? If, after we all gave it some thought, we
agreed that it really didn't matter and that we should let its spelling be
determined organically, then wouldn't we have saved each other a lot of
time working to change something that was better left to grow on its own
according to systems that my be wiser than we are about naming?

My few cents, anyway.

Will

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, oren.salo...@gmail.com 
oren.salo...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm with Marius on this one.

 I think the important thing here is to get us in the dictionary with the
 spelling we use.

 To me, the spelling issue has always been indicative of a bigger thing,
 which is official recognition as part of the English language.

 After 10 years, I think the movement has earned it.

 William, how would you feel if everyone started calling you Bill or
 Will-iam? What if the difference between Will-iam and William was just in
 written language and not in speech? You even stated that the reason you
 spell it coworking is out of respect for the rest of us that have all
 settled on coworking (you even prefer co-working!). That's all we're asking
 of journalists in this case. And if they're denying our requests on the
 basis of being or not being in the dictionary, then let's get in the
 dictionary.

 Also Derek, the cowering autocorrect annoys me too! It never learns!





 On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 12:47:01 PM UTC-5, Marius Amado-Alves
 wrote:

 FWIW, I agree with Will's arguments except the cow one.

 To summarize, the spelling is irrelevant, because there is only one
 coworking, irrespectively of how it is spelt. As Will points out, working
 with others in a company is never referred to as 

Re: [Coworking] Re: Basic elements for a definition of coworking

2014-09-19 Thread Ramon Suarez
Jon, I do as you do. They are members of a community and at the same time
they are clients. They pay for a service, not only for belonging.

Ramon Suarez
Serendipity Accelerator, Betacowork
Author: http://coworkinghandbook.com
email  hangouts: ra...@betacowork.com
Phone: +3227376769
GSM: +32497556284
Twitter:http://twitter.com/ramonsuarez
Skype: ramonsuarez
Try coworking: http://betacowork.com
http://betacowork.com/free-coworking-tryout/?utm_source=emailutm_medium=468x60_bannerutm_content=girl-homeutm_campaign=ramon-signature

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jon Stever, The Office RW 
jste...@gmail.com wrote:

 Re: clients vs. members.

 I would definitely agree on the philosophical distinction.
  Essentially,it's trying to tease out whether the space exists to build a
 community (members) or to earn a margin on real estate (clients).  This
 is an important dichotomy, but it's also strictly false as we all exist on
 a sliding scale between these two extremes.

 I don't think we want to start to see client as a dirty word...at a nice
 restaurant the clients will be on a first-name basis with staff, have a
 special table, regular meal selections, and even Christmas cards in the
 mail (and may even be called patrons to distinguish the relationship),
 while at McDonald's clients are a mass of impersonal and transactional
 relationships.

 I find myself slipping interchangeably between terms when talking about The
 Office http://theoffice.rw, because as a coworking space manager and
 business manager I have to think both in terms of building and
 strengthening our community (membership) and in terms of making the
 numbers work and communicating with potential partners and investors
 (clients).  When I'm thinking in terms of investment and expansion, I
 intellectual categorize members as clients...this is often
 sub-conscious and I used to even feel ashamed when I realized that I had
 done it, but I wonder if this is really such a horrible thing.  Because,
 when I think about why I do what I do and the people I work with and for, I
 think of friends and members...

 What do you think?

 - Jon

 On Friday, 12 September 2014 13:15:23 UTC+2, Alex Hillman wrote:



  In my opinion a coworking space -- being a *community* of coworkers --
 always calls and treats its coworkers *members*.

 ​
 I like this one a lot!!

 -Alex

  --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
 Google Groups Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/coworking/Tvf2gg-WZ5w/unsubscribe.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
 coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Coworking] Re: Getting rid of the co-working hyphen

2014-09-19 Thread Victoria Arnold
YES! love this. Desk Union is in

On Thursday, 1 September 2011 10:29:20 UTC+1, sop...@deskwanted.com wrote:

 Hi everyone, 

 For a while now we've been annoyed about the resurgence in the use of 
 the hyphenated version of the word coworking. As you all know, most 
 major media outlets these days write it as co-working. 
 Deskmag recently published an article explaining why this is 
 happening: it's because the AP Stylebook has decided that co-working 
 is the correct form. 
 However, we'd like to ask for your assistance in helping AP change 
 their minds! We've put out a call for people to bombard AP with the 
 following tweet: 

 @APStylebook #Coworking is not Co-working. It’s an independent 
 movement that doesn’t want to be separated by a hyphen! 

 For a backgrounder on why we think the word should be without a 
 hyphen, have a read of the article: 
 http://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-or-co-working-with-hyphen-252 

 What do you all think? I know this is an old issue, but it's important 
 to get the name right, right? 

 Sophie 
 Deskmag/Deskwanted

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Coworking] getting rid of the co-working hyphen

2014-09-19 Thread Lauren M Grant
Hi All,



I’ve done a little research trying to figure out how we might move forward
in trying to persuade the AP to reconsider their position on the co-working
vs. coworking issue.  Most of what follows is less of a concrete plan, and
more of the background info we would need in deciding where/how to focus
our efforts:



*1. **Webster’s New World College Dictionary** (WNWCD) is the official
dictionary for the AP Stylebook. *

·  Interestingly, and importantly, the *WNWCD* is not published by
Meriam Webster, but by Houghton Mifflin.

·  There will be differences, then, between *WNWCD*’s and
Meriam-Webster’s treatment of terms.

·  So, if we want to begin by getting coworking into a dictionary, it
seems like focusing our attention on the *WNWCD* would be best.

·  *BUT*…. The AP’s rules of spelling, grammar, etc. don’t *always* match
the *WNWCD.*

-   For example, the AP spells email without a hyphen, while *WNWCD*’s
primary definition retains the hyphen.

·  So, if *WNWCD* adds coworking to their dictionary it wouldn’t
necessarily result in a change in the AP’s approach to spelling co-working.

-   Although the AP Stylebooks’s values are listed as consistency,
clarity, accuracy, and brevity, they definitely seem to be privileging
consistency in their continued use of co-working.  (We’ve always spelled it
this way and will continue to do so…)

·  Finally, the *WNWCD* just issued its first print revision in decades
on August 26.  I am guessing that another print edition will not come out
for some time.  We might lobby for the addition of coworking now, but it
would be a while before we saw the change in print.

-   The online version of *WNWCD* probably publishes updates more
regularly, but I can’t view their editorial policy without a subscription.

*2. **If we want to argue with the editor(s) at the AP Stylebook
directly, we will need a subscription.*

·  As far as I can tell only subscribers can submit questions to the
editor and view the complete archive of past Q and As to the editor.

-  A yearly subscription to the AP Style Guide is $26.

*3. **Why does the New York Times use “coworking” when speaking of the
Coworking Visa, but not in other cases, as Jacob mentioned in his post?*

·  Although the *New York Times* uses the *WNWCD*, they have their very
own style guide that conflicts with the AP’s style guide on many points

*4. **So, what are our options?*

·  We can work to have coworking included in various dictionaries.  This
may not impact the AP Stylebook, but it would contribute to making the
distinction between co-working and coworking clearer and bring general
awareness to the issue.

-   I would be happy to do some research on how different dictionaries
treat address the issue of co-working v. coworking if at all, and what the
editorial policies are for adding/amending entries.

·  Tweet our discontent

-   As Carsten Foertsch suggested in his article for deskmag:  @APStylebook
#Coworking is not Co-working.  It’s an independent movement that doesn’t
want to be separated by a hyphen!

-   This was suggested in 2011, however, and there hasn’t been much
activity since.  Do we want to revitalize this? Perhaps come up with a new
hashtag?

-  Does anyone have other ideas?
Hopefully this info will be useful when deciding what steps to take next!

-- 
Lauren Grant

Office Nomads
officenomads.com
206-323-6500

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] getting rid of the co-working hyphen

2014-09-19 Thread Tony Bacigalupo
Lauren, this is really really handy to know!

Does anyone on this group have an active AP Stylebook subscription?


On Friday, September 19, 2014, Lauren M Grant lau...@officenomads.com
wrote:

 Hi All,



 I've done a little research trying to figure out how we might move forward
 in trying to persuade the AP to reconsider their position on the co-working
 vs. coworking issue.  Most of what follows is less of a concrete plan,
 and more of the background info we would need in deciding where/how to
 focus our efforts:



 *1. **Webster's New World College Dictionary** (WNWCD) is the
 official dictionary for the AP Stylebook. *

 ·  Interestingly, and importantly, the *WNWCD* is not published by
 Meriam Webster, but by Houghton Mifflin.

 ·  There will be differences, then, between *WNWCD*'s and
 Meriam-Webster's treatment of terms.

 ·  So, if we want to begin by getting coworking into a dictionary, it
 seems like focusing our attention on the *WNWCD* would be best.

 ·  *BUT* The AP's rules of spelling, grammar, etc. don't *always* 
 match
 the *WNWCD.*

 -   For example, the AP spells email without a hyphen, while *WNWCD*'s
 primary definition retains the hyphen.

 ·  So, if *WNWCD* adds coworking to their dictionary it wouldn't
 necessarily result in a change in the AP's approach to spelling co-working.

 -   Although the AP Stylebooks's values are listed as consistency,
 clarity, accuracy, and brevity, they definitely seem to be privileging
 consistency in their continued use of co-working.  (We've always spelled
 it this way and will continue to do so...)

 ·  Finally, the *WNWCD* just issued its first print revision in
 decades on August 26.  I am guessing that another print edition will not
 come out for some time.  We might lobby for the addition of coworking
 now, but it would be a while before we saw the change in print.

 -   The online version of *WNWCD* probably publishes updates more
 regularly, but I can't view their editorial policy without a subscription.

 *2. **If we want to argue with the editor(s) at the AP Stylebook
 directly, we will need a subscription.*

 ·  As far as I can tell only subscribers can submit questions to the
 editor and view the complete archive of past Q and As to the editor.

 -  A yearly subscription to the AP Style Guide is $26.

 *3. **Why does the New York Times use coworking when speaking of
 the Coworking Visa, but not in other cases, as Jacob mentioned in his post?*

 ·  Although the *New York Times* uses the *WNWCD*, they have their
 very own style guide that conflicts with the AP's style guide on many points

 *4. **So, what are our options?*

 ·  We can work to have coworking included in various dictionaries.  This
 may not impact the AP Stylebook, but it would contribute to making the
 distinction between co-working and coworking clearer and bring general
 awareness to the issue.

 -   I would be happy to do some research on how different
 dictionaries treat address the issue of co-working v. coworking if at all,
 and what the editorial policies are for adding/amending entries.

 ·  Tweet our discontent

 -   As Carsten Foertsch suggested in his article for deskmag:  
 @APStylebook
 #Coworking is not Co-working.  It's an independent movement that doesn't
 want to be separated by a hyphen!

 -   This was suggested in 2011, however, and there hasn't been much
 activity since.  Do we want to revitalize this? Perhaps come up with a
 new hashtag?

 -  Does anyone have other ideas?
 Hopefully this info will be useful when deciding what steps to take next!

 --
 Lauren Grant

 Office Nomads
 officenomads.com
 206-323-6500

  --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','coworking%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');
 .
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 


*--- + Personal: twitter http://twitter.com/tonybgoode * fb
http://facebook.com/tonybacigalupo * linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/tonybacigalupo+ Projects: NWC
http://nwc.co/ * Bossless http://bossless.co/ * Meetup
http://meetup.com/coworking-nyc * NYTM http://nytm.org/+ Recent
posts: Quarantining new ideas for monthly review
http://happymonster.co/2014/08/20/quarantining-new-ideas-for-monthly-review/
* Routine
challenges http://happymonster.co/2014/08/14/routine-challenges/ * Act IV
http://happymonster.co/2014/08/08/act-iv/*
*+ Currently reading: Nonviolent Communication http://amzn.to/1sBVeoR *
Passages http://amzn.to/1p8rNai * Work http://amzn.to/1utpc0l*
*+ Travel plans: NYC now-9/11 * Boulder 9/11-9/18 * Seattle 9/18-23 * NYC
9/24-Mid-October+ Help: I'm looking for a fab 1BR in south Brooklyn. Let me
know if you have any 

[Coworking] Free coworking for Climate Week at Impact Hub NYC

2014-09-19 Thread Leif Utne
Here's a cool promo from the Impact Hub NYC to support the climate movement
during the upcoming UN conference on climate change. (Disclosure: My
brother Sam Utne runs the Impact Hub NYC.) I like this approach of using
their space to support activists while getting more people in the door and
building exposure for the space among their target clientele.

I'm curious how common this approach is among coworking spaces generally.
Do you offer targeted freebies or discounts around big events/conferences
in your town (whether or not they have an activist bent)?

cheers,
Leif

--
Heading to NYC for the People's Climate March and UN climate conference?
Park yourself for free at the Impact Hub NYC coworking + event space, Sept
22-26. RSVP at http://bit.ly/impacthubclimate. Pass it on.

[image: Inline image 1]


-- 
Leif Utne
VP of Business Development
Warecorp http://warecorp.com / Drupal Squad http://drupalsquad.com
+1.612.327.0123
twitter: @leifutne http://twitter.com/leifutne
blog: leifutne.com
skype: leifutne
--

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Coworking] Hiring business partner in Portland Oregon, might you know someone?

2014-09-19 Thread Alex Linsker
I'm hiring a business partner for Collective Agency, one of the main
co-working places in Portland Oregon, might you know someone? It pays
$50,000-$65,000 per year, and involves sales/marketing, operations, and
community organizing. I'd prefer someone who's a woman to balance the
gender ratio, although I'm open to the best person for the job.

http://collectiveagency.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/collective-agency-community-organizer-job-description091914c.pdf

Thanks,

Alex
-- 
Alex Linsker
Collective Agency's Community Organizer / Proprietor
 (503) 517-6900 http://collectiveagency.co
Tax and Conversation's Statewide Community Organizer
 (503) 517-6904 taxandconversation.com
(503) 369-9174 mobile   (503) 517-6901 fax
322 NW Sixth Ave, Suite 200, Portland, Oregon 97209

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.