[Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Ramon Suarez
From home connections to gigabit, everything goes. Make sure that you can 
upgrade easily

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Alex Hillman
I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way - even
within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky data
to acquire!

But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how bandwidth
is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had hundreds of people
piping through a shared connection every day:

1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without getting
super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network responds,
which is different from how fast files download.

MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or using
internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game developers and
video editors, the files we move around in our daily work are relatively
small.

But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to load a
page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels like it has
a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb down/10mb up
almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people working hard
every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc.

Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen in our
network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our internet
provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the network is
uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or uploading a
video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency because it thinks
something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular site
like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice things
slowing down. 200ms and the network feels like it's crawling.
Interestingly, though, you can still download big files quickly they just
take a few extra moments before they start.

It's a rough experience to explain to people, and they don't care if it's
latency or speed they just want to work. So understanding that more speed
without an improvement in latency is important.

2) the network itself is just as important as the Internet connection.
There's been a bunch of great discussions on this list about network design
and what hardware to get before, but Jon Markwell's post sums up the
majority of the best of it:
http://jonathanmarkwell.com/2014/11/22/best-coworking-wifi/

We upgraded to the Unifi system that he mentions in this post and it's been
a MASSIVE improvement over everything else we tried. I heartily endorse
this recommendation now from first hand experience!

-Alex

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com'); wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 do you recommend any websites or databases for researching average data
 consumption by industry and/or company size?

 or do you have any insights to share regarding how your ventures provide
 internet services?

 thanks :)

 Cassidy

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 

--
*The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Aaron Cruikshank
We found that the upload speed was an important consideration if you have a
lot of people in your space doing video conferencing via Skype, Google
Hangouts, etc...
At the HiVE, we were on a coax cable internet plan and the upload speed was
1 MB/s. It used to brown out the internet for everyone if more than two
people tried to do video calling at the same time. When we switched to
fibre, we were then getting 100 MB/s up and the brownout problem went away.

Aaron Cruikshank
Principal, CRUIKSHANK
phone: 778.908.4560
e-mail: aa...@cruikshank.me
web: cruikshank.me http://www.cruikshank.me
twitter: @cruikshank https://twitter.com/cruikshank
book a meeting: doodle.com/cruikshank http://www.doodle.com/cruikshank
linkedin: in/cruikshank http://www.linkedin.com/in/cruikshank




On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Jacob Sayles ja...@officenomads.com
wrote:

 Also on the DHCP front we switched to using a netmask of 23 instead of 24
 to get twice the number of addresses.

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk
 wrote:

 Yeah, dropped it down to a day from 7 and our helped.

 (Secretly looking for an excuse to buy better kit anyway! )
 On 2 Apr 2015 18:29, Glen Ferguson g...@coworkfrederick.com wrote:

 If you shorten the DHCP lease time to 2, 4, or even 8 hours, that should
 address the problem of running  out of leases.

*Glen Ferguson*
  Phone: 301-732-5165
 Email: g...@coworkfrederick.com http://mailtog...@coworkfrederick.com
 Website: http://coworkfrederick.com
 Address: 122 E Patrick St, Frederick, MD 21701

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Alex Hillman 
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh yeah my experience matches Stuart's, the dual band is *much*
 better.

 I thought we could get away with the single band $99-per-unit versions
 when we expanded our initial cover and...yeah, they're just not as good.

 Definitely spring for the Pro units - this 3 pack:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Networks-Enterprise-System-UAP-PRO-3/dp/B00DJERLFG


 Or this single unit:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Enterprise-System-AP-Pro-UAP-PRO/dp/B00HXT8T5O/ref=pd_sim_pc_6?ie=UTF8refRID=1SYSFCBY9V4T4H5TW0P1

 -Alex


 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk
 wrote:

 +1 to the Unifi recommendation.

 We found that the dual band versions work far better. It seems a lot
 of users in the building our space shares are using 2.4Ghz only routers so
 we have the 5Ghz band to ourself...

 Something we've bumped into very recently is exhausting the DHCP pool
 on our router (a Draytek) which only supports 254 DHCP total address, no
 matter what size subnet you configure. The symptoms are people being 
 unable
 to connect to the network because there is no spare DHCP address for them.
 We have one of these on order which will fix this issue, and provide us
 with better throughput from our network to the internet -
 http://linitx.com/product/linitx-apu-1d-3nicusbrtc-pfsense-embed-firewall-kit-red/14094


 On Thursday, 2 April 2015 14:02:24 UTC+1, Alex Hillman wrote:

 I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way -
 even within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky
 data to acquire!

 But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how
 bandwidth is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had
 hundreds of people piping through a shared connection every day:

 1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without
 getting super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network
 responds, which is different from how fast files download.

 MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or
 using internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game
 developers and video editors, the files we move around in our daily work
 are relatively small.

 But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to
 load a page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels 
 like
 it has a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb
 down/10mb up almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people
 working hard every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc.

 Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen
 in our network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our
 internet provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the
 network is uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or
 uploading a video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency
 because it thinks something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

 Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular
 site like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice
 things slowing down. 200ms 

Re: [Coworking] What metrics do you all gauge to decide whether a location will work well for a coworking space?

2015-04-02 Thread Alex Hillman
Yeah, big +1 to that.

We have done some research into the reasons people join and stay, and
location/proximity are consistently WAY lower on the top 10 list than
anybody expects.

That data (and more) can be found in this synthesis:
http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/alexknowshtml/quantifying-community-how-we-measure-success-in-a-coworking-space

I also had a couple of academic researchers on my podcast recently who
found that things like proximity are far less indicators of people
choosing coworking, since the people who choose it generally have workspace
alternatives that are closer than the one they end up joining and paying
for.

Location matters, but it matters a lot less than you might think if you're
actually solving a problem for people.

-Alex


On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Andy Soell aso...@gmail.com wrote:

 I know this isn't exactly what you're asking, but Alex's post reminded me
 of one of the most interesting and unexpected things I've found since we
 opened our space nearly 3 years ago. I expected that we would have around
 80% of our members coming from the immediate neighborhood, but I've found
 that people are more than willing to commute if the place they're commuting
 to is a place they enjoy working. I just took a quick scan of our member
 roster and less than a quarter of our members live in what I would consider
 the neighborhood of either of our spaces. Several of those 25% are in the
 neighborhood because they've specifically moved here after joining us,
 which is even more incredible.

 So yeah, it's not necessarily about proximity as much as what you're
 offering and the kind of community you're cultivating.

 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 9:44:02 PM UTC-4, Alex Hillman wrote:

 How many people are in a radius doesn't really matter, if none of those
 people care about or need Coworking.

 We did something counterintuitive when we began: we put Indy Hall in a
 place where NONE of our community members already were. We chose a
 neighborhood that was easily accessible my public transit (something
 important to our community), but all of our early members lived in 3 main
 parts of the city and we chose to open in an area that was relatively
 central to all 3. If we had picked any one of those three parts, the
 other 2/3rds of our community would've felt more disconnected.

 Bur I say relative because that's important. There is ALWAYS someone who
 will say that you're too far away. In our case, that can be as far away
 as 4 subway stops. It depends on what people are used to.

 All of this stems from answering a bigger question and asking: who are
 your members? Not a demographic, or people you hope to reach...but who are
 the ACTUAL people that you CAN reach. Where are they, and where do they
 already go? Do they cross neighborhoods? How do they get there? What kind
 of work do they do? Can they work from anywhere? Do they have the power to
 choose where they work? Do they like the way they work, or is there a
 problem or set of problems?

 I'm a HUGE supporter of doing pop-up Coworking (aka Jelly,
 workatjelly.com) for a while before selecting any space because it's the
 ideal way of seeing who actually shows up, and where, and most importantly
 WHY. Is it because they need a place to work? Or...is it because they're
 lonely at home and cafes are awkward to be a professional.

 And you can find all of that our before ever wasting time on finding the
 perfect location (which doesn't exist, that's a fantasy) and without
 spending a dollar, unsure if you'll ever see that dollar again.

 -Alex

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://listen.coworkingweekly.com


 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 What metrics do you all gauge to decide whether a location will work?
 Like,
 - at least 100,000 people in a 5 mile radius
 - at least 100,000 small businesses in a 5 mile radius
 etc.

 Thanks!

 Cassidy

  --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 --

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

  --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','coworking%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');
 .
 For more options, visit 

Re: [Coworking] What metrics do you all gauge to decide whether a location will work well for a coworking space?

2015-04-02 Thread Andy Soell
I know this isn't exactly what you're asking, but Alex's post reminded me 
of one of the most interesting and unexpected things I've found since we 
opened our space nearly 3 years ago. I expected that we would have around 
80% of our members coming from the immediate neighborhood, but I've found 
that people are more than willing to commute if the place they're commuting 
to is a place they enjoy working. I just took a quick scan of our member 
roster and less than a quarter of our members live in what I would consider 
the neighborhood of either of our spaces. Several of those 25% are in the 
neighborhood because they've specifically moved here after joining us, 
which is even more incredible.

So yeah, it's not necessarily about proximity as much as what you're 
offering and the kind of community you're cultivating.

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 9:44:02 PM UTC-4, Alex Hillman wrote:

 How many people are in a radius doesn't really matter, if none of those 
 people care about or need Coworking. 

 We did something counterintuitive when we began: we put Indy Hall in a 
 place where NONE of our community members already were. We chose a 
 neighborhood that was easily accessible my public transit (something 
 important to our community), but all of our early members lived in 3 main 
 parts of the city and we chose to open in an area that was relatively 
 central to all 3. If we had picked any one of those three parts, the 
 other 2/3rds of our community would've felt more disconnected. 

 Bur I say relative because that's important. There is ALWAYS someone who 
 will say that you're too far away. In our case, that can be as far away 
 as 4 subway stops. It depends on what people are used to. 

 All of this stems from answering a bigger question and asking: who are 
 your members? Not a demographic, or people you hope to reach...but who are 
 the ACTUAL people that you CAN reach. Where are they, and where do they 
 already go? Do they cross neighborhoods? How do they get there? What kind 
 of work do they do? Can they work from anywhere? Do they have the power to 
 choose where they work? Do they like the way they work, or is there a 
 problem or set of problems?

 I'm a HUGE supporter of doing pop-up Coworking (aka Jelly, workatjelly.com) 
 for a while before selecting any space because it's the ideal way of seeing 
 who actually shows up, and where, and most importantly WHY. Is it because 
 they need a place to work? Or...is it because they're lonely at home and 
 cafes are awkward to be a professional. 

 And you can find all of that our before ever wasting time on finding the 
 perfect location (which doesn't exist, that's a fantasy) and without 
 spending a dollar, unsure if you'll ever see that dollar again.

 -Alex

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://listen.coworkingweekly.com


 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

 What metrics do you all gauge to decide whether a location will work?
 Like, 
 - at least 100,000 people in a 5 mile radius
 - at least 100,000 small businesses in a 5 mile radius
 etc.

 Thanks! 

 Cassidy

  -- 
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 -- 

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast



-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Glen Ferguson
If you shorten the DHCP lease time to 2, 4, or even 8 hours, that should
address the problem of running  out of leases.

   *Glen Ferguson*
 Phone: 301-732-5165
Email: g...@coworkfrederick.com mailtog...@coworkfrederick.com
Website: http://coworkfrederick.com
Address: 122 E Patrick St, Frederick, MD 21701

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Oh yeah my experience matches Stuart's, the dual band is *much* better.

 I thought we could get away with the single band $99-per-unit versions
 when we expanded our initial cover and...yeah, they're just not as good.

 Definitely spring for the Pro units - this 3 pack:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Networks-Enterprise-System-UAP-PRO-3/dp/B00DJERLFG


 Or this single unit:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Enterprise-System-AP-Pro-UAP-PRO/dp/B00HXT8T5O/ref=pd_sim_pc_6?ie=UTF8refRID=1SYSFCBY9V4T4H5TW0P1

 -Alex


 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk
 wrote:

 +1 to the Unifi recommendation.

 We found that the dual band versions work far better. It seems a lot of
 users in the building our space shares are using 2.4Ghz only routers so we
 have the 5Ghz band to ourself...

 Something we've bumped into very recently is exhausting the DHCP pool on
 our router (a Draytek) which only supports 254 DHCP total address, no
 matter what size subnet you configure. The symptoms are people being unable
 to connect to the network because there is no spare DHCP address for them.
 We have one of these on order which will fix this issue, and provide us
 with better throughput from our network to the internet -
 http://linitx.com/product/linitx-apu-1d-3nicusbrtc-pfsense-embed-firewall-kit-red/14094


 On Thursday, 2 April 2015 14:02:24 UTC+1, Alex Hillman wrote:

 I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way -
 even within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky
 data to acquire!

 But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how
 bandwidth is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had
 hundreds of people piping through a shared connection every day:

 1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without
 getting super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network
 responds, which is different from how fast files download.

 MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or
 using internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game
 developers and video editors, the files we move around in our daily work
 are relatively small.

 But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to load
 a page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels like it
 has a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb
 down/10mb up almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people
 working hard every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc.

 Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen in
 our network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our internet
 provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the network is
 uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or uploading a
 video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency because it thinks
 something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

 Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular site
 like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice things
 slowing down. 200ms and the network feels like it's crawling.
 Interestingly, though, you can still download big files quickly they just
 take a few extra moments before they start.

 It's a rough experience to explain to people, and they don't care if
 it's latency or speed they just want to work. So understanding that more
 speed without an improvement in latency is important.

 2) the network itself is just as important as the Internet connection.
 There's been a bunch of great discussions on this list about network design
 and what hardware to get before, but Jon Markwell's post sums up the
 majority of the best of it: http://jonathanmarkwell.
 com/2014/11/22/best-coworking-wifi/

 We upgraded to the Unifi system that he mentions in this post and it's
 been a MASSIVE improvement over everything else we tried. I
 heartily endorse this recommendation now from first hand experience!

 -Alex

 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 do you recommend any websites or databases for researching average data
 consumption by industry and/or company size?

 or do you have any insights to share regarding how your ventures
 provide internet services?

 thanks :)

 Cassidy

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at 

Re: [Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Stuart Lambert
+1 to the Unifi recommendation.

We found that the dual band versions work far better. It seems a lot of 
users in the building our space shares are using 2.4Ghz only routers so we 
have the 5Ghz band to ourself...

Something we've bumped into very recently is exhausting the DHCP pool on 
our router (a Draytek) which only supports 254 DHCP total address, no 
matter what size subnet you configure. The symptoms are people being unable 
to connect to the network because there is no spare DHCP address for them. 
We have one of these on order which will fix this issue, and provide us 
with better throughput from our network to the internet 
- 
http://linitx.com/product/linitx-apu-1d-3nicusbrtc-pfsense-embed-firewall-kit-red/14094


On Thursday, 2 April 2015 14:02:24 UTC+1, Alex Hillman wrote:

 I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way - even 
 within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky data 
 to acquire! 

 But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how bandwidth 
 is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had hundreds of people 
 piping through a shared connection every day:

 1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without getting 
 super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network responds, 
 which is different from how fast files download. 

 MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or 
 using internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game 
 developers and video editors, the files we move around in our daily work 
 are relatively small. 

 But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to load a 
 page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels like it has 
 a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb down/10mb up 
 almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people working hard 
 every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc. 

 Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen in 
 our network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our internet 
 provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the network is 
 uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or uploading a 
 video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency because it thinks 
 something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

 Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular site 
 like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice things 
 slowing down. 200ms and the network feels like it's crawling. 
 Interestingly, though, you can still download big files quickly they just 
 take a few extra moments before they start. 

 It's a rough experience to explain to people, and they don't care if it's 
 latency or speed they just want to work. So understanding that more speed 
 without an improvement in latency is important. 

 2) the network itself is just as important as the Internet connection. 
 There's been a bunch of great discussions on this list about network design 
 and what hardware to get before, but Jon Markwell's post sums up the 
 majority of the best of it: 
 http://jonathanmarkwell.com/2014/11/22/best-coworking-wifi/

 We upgraded to the Unifi system that he mentions in this post and it's 
 been a MASSIVE improvement over everything else we tried. I 
 heartily endorse this recommendation now from first hand experience!

 -Alex

 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 do you recommend any websites or databases for researching average data 
 consumption by industry and/or company size?

 or do you have any insights to share regarding how your ventures provide 
 internet services?

 thanks :) 

 Cassidy

 -- 
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 -- 

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast



-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Alex Hillman
Oh yeah my experience matches Stuart's, the dual band is *much* better.

I thought we could get away with the single band $99-per-unit versions when
we expanded our initial cover and...yeah, they're just not as good.

Definitely spring for the Pro units - this 3 pack:
http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Networks-Enterprise-System-UAP-PRO-3/dp/B00DJERLFG


Or this single unit:
http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Enterprise-System-AP-Pro-UAP-PRO/dp/B00HXT8T5O/ref=pd_sim_pc_6?ie=UTF8refRID=1SYSFCBY9V4T4H5TW0P1

-Alex


--
*The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk wrote:

 +1 to the Unifi recommendation.

 We found that the dual band versions work far better. It seems a lot of
 users in the building our space shares are using 2.4Ghz only routers so we
 have the 5Ghz band to ourself...

 Something we've bumped into very recently is exhausting the DHCP pool on
 our router (a Draytek) which only supports 254 DHCP total address, no
 matter what size subnet you configure. The symptoms are people being unable
 to connect to the network because there is no spare DHCP address for them.
 We have one of these on order which will fix this issue, and provide us
 with better throughput from our network to the internet -
 http://linitx.com/product/linitx-apu-1d-3nicusbrtc-pfsense-embed-firewall-kit-red/14094


 On Thursday, 2 April 2015 14:02:24 UTC+1, Alex Hillman wrote:

 I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way - even
 within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky data
 to acquire!

 But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how
 bandwidth is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had hundreds
 of people piping through a shared connection every day:

 1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without getting
 super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network responds,
 which is different from how fast files download.

 MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or
 using internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game
 developers and video editors, the files we move around in our daily work
 are relatively small.

 But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to load
 a page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels like it
 has a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb
 down/10mb up almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people
 working hard every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc.

 Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen in
 our network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our internet
 provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the network is
 uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or uploading a
 video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency because it thinks
 something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

 Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular site
 like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice things
 slowing down. 200ms and the network feels like it's crawling.
 Interestingly, though, you can still download big files quickly they just
 take a few extra moments before they start.

 It's a rough experience to explain to people, and they don't care if it's
 latency or speed they just want to work. So understanding that more speed
 without an improvement in latency is important.

 2) the network itself is just as important as the Internet connection.
 There's been a bunch of great discussions on this list about network design
 and what hardware to get before, but Jon Markwell's post sums up the
 majority of the best of it: http://jonathanmarkwell.
 com/2014/11/22/best-coworking-wifi/

 We upgraded to the Unifi system that he mentions in this post and it's
 been a MASSIVE improvement over everything else we tried. I
 heartily endorse this recommendation now from first hand experience!

 -Alex

 On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Cassidy bartolomei.contract...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 do you recommend any websites or databases for researching average data
 consumption by industry and/or company size?

 or do you have any insights to share regarding how your ventures provide
 internet services?

 thanks :)

 Cassidy

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



 --

 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 

Re: [Coworking] Bandwidth questions for new coworking venture

2015-04-02 Thread Jacob Sayles
Also on the DHCP front we switched to using a netmask of 23 instead of 24
to get twice the number of addresses.

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk wrote:

 Yeah, dropped it down to a day from 7 and our helped.

 (Secretly looking for an excuse to buy better kit anyway! )
 On 2 Apr 2015 18:29, Glen Ferguson g...@coworkfrederick.com wrote:

 If you shorten the DHCP lease time to 2, 4, or even 8 hours, that should
 address the problem of running  out of leases.

*Glen Ferguson*
  Phone: 301-732-5165
 Email: g...@coworkfrederick.com http://mailtog...@coworkfrederick.com
 Website: http://coworkfrederick.com
 Address: 122 E Patrick St, Frederick, MD 21701

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Alex Hillman 
 dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com wrote:

 Oh yeah my experience matches Stuart's, the dual band is *much* better.

 I thought we could get away with the single band $99-per-unit versions
 when we expanded our initial cover and...yeah, they're just not as good.

 Definitely spring for the Pro units - this 3 pack:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Networks-Enterprise-System-UAP-PRO-3/dp/B00DJERLFG


 Or this single unit:
 http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-Enterprise-System-AP-Pro-UAP-PRO/dp/B00HXT8T5O/ref=pd_sim_pc_6?ie=UTF8refRID=1SYSFCBY9V4T4H5TW0P1

 -Alex


 --
 *The #1 mistake in community building is doing it by yourself.*
 Join the list: http://coworkingweekly.com
 Listen to the podcast: http://dangerouslyawesome.com/podcast

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Stuart Lambert stu...@cohub.co.uk
 wrote:

 +1 to the Unifi recommendation.

 We found that the dual band versions work far better. It seems a lot of
 users in the building our space shares are using 2.4Ghz only routers so we
 have the 5Ghz band to ourself...

 Something we've bumped into very recently is exhausting the DHCP pool
 on our router (a Draytek) which only supports 254 DHCP total address, no
 matter what size subnet you configure. The symptoms are people being unable
 to connect to the network because there is no spare DHCP address for them.
 We have one of these on order which will fix this issue, and provide us
 with better throughput from our network to the internet -
 http://linitx.com/product/linitx-apu-1d-3nicusbrtc-pfsense-embed-firewall-kit-red/14094


 On Thursday, 2 April 2015 14:02:24 UTC+1, Alex Hillman wrote:

 I've never seen a resource that organizes bandwidth usage that way -
 even within our individual respective spaces I think that would be tricky
 data to acquire!

 But two things that aren't obvious about Internet usage (and how
 bandwidth is just a tiny part of the equation) until you've had
 hundreds of people piping through a shared connection every day:

 1) bandwidth is important, but latency is more important. Without
 getting super duper technical, latency is the speed that the network
 responds, which is different from how fast files download.

 MOST people spend a lot of their day clicking around the Internet, or
 using internet connected apps. With some rare exceptions like game
 developers and video editors, the files we move around in our daily work
 are relatively small.

 But when the latency is bad - everyone feels it because clicking to
 load a page, or refresh email, or live typing on Google docs etc feels 
 like
 it has a lag. Our network (internal wireless + gigabit) plus our 50mb
 down/10mb up almost always has more than enough bandwidth for 120+ people
 working hard every day. And that includes streaming videos, music, etc.

 Where things go haywire is when latency ratchets up. This can happen
 in our network because wifi coverage is interrupted, or because our
 internet provider is having issues, or most often because someone on the
 network is uploading a huge file (offsite backup like a Dropbox sync or
 uploading a video to YouTube) and our ISP starts to throttle latency
 because it thinks something is wrong. This tool is FOREVER to figure out!

 Our normal network latency is 20-30ms response time from a popular
 site like google.com when it goes above 100ms, you start to notice
 things slowing down. 200ms and the network feels like it's crawling.
 Interestingly, though, you can still download big files quickly they just
 take a few extra moments before they start.

 It's a rough experience to explain to people, and they don't care if
 it's latency or speed they just want to work. So understanding that more
 speed without an improvement in latency is important.

 2) the network itself is just as important as the Internet connection.
 There's been a bunch of great discussions on this list about network 
 design
 and what hardware to get before, but Jon Markwell's post sums up the
 majority of the best of it: http://jonathanmarkwell.
 com/2014/11/22/best-coworking-wifi/

 We upgraded to the Unifi system that he mentions in this post and it's
 been a MASSIVE improvement over everything else we tried. I
 heartily endorse this recommendation now from first