Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-11 Thread Marius Amado-Alves


 ... the signatures of three members who will vouch for them as good fits 
 for membership.


Just curious, should the new member mischieve, what would happen to the 
supporting members.

  

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-11 Thread Tom Brandt
I worded that poorly. The supporting members are saying that they trust
this person to be a member, they are not guaranteeing it. If the new member
violates that trust, I am sure the supporting members would feel badly, but
nothing would happen to them.

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Marius Amado-Alves amado.al...@gmail.com
wrote:

 ... the signatures of three members who will vouch for them as good fits
 for membership.


 Just curious, should the new member mischieve, what would happen to the
 supporting members.

   --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
twb
member, Workantile http://workantile.com/
@twbrandt

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-11 Thread Alex Hillman
It's a trust network, not a blame network :) 


More importantly, the signatures themselves aren't the point. They're an action 
that someone has to take to get to know people who already care enough to look 
after the things worth protecting. 




Even a background check company doesn't have that incentive: the best they can 
do is tell you about recorded red flags and legal infractions, not that 
somebody is going to be disrespectful or problematic (which is statistically 
more likely than having an actual criminal try to JOIN in a long-com 
operation). 




Worth noting: we've made tweaks to the signature model since we invented it, 
the most important being that we make sure that the new keyholder 




a) gets signatures from outside of their pre-existing circles. This means that 
for people who become new full time members as part of an existing team who 
works at Indy Hall, they need to get their sign off from people NOT on their 
team. We explain to them why the process is in place and everybody has 
understood and appreciated it





b) they need to be able to say who signed their sheet after turning it over to 
us. Some people were just going around and getting signatures without actually 
getting to know people. If they can't even remember the name of who signed off 
on them, the signature doesn't count because they didn't hold up their end of 
the deal that makes the process work. 




There's a recent thread in the google group archives where I explained how 
little ACTUAL overnight/24 hour use happens, but I can't seem to copy the link 
to that thread form mobile :) if someone else can grab it before I do and post 
it here that'd be awesome. 

 


--
/ah
indyhall.org

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Tom Brandt twbra...@gmail.com wrote:

 I worded that poorly. The supporting members are saying that they trust
 this person to be a member, they are not guaranteeing it. If the new member
 violates that trust, I am sure the supporting members would feel badly, but
 nothing would happen to them.
 On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Marius Amado-Alves amado.al...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 ... the signatures of three members who will vouch for them as good fits
 for membership.


 Just curious, should the new member mischieve, what would happen to the
 supporting members.

   --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 -- 
 twb
 member, Workantile http://workantile.com/
 @twbrandt
 -- 
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-11 Thread Tom Brandt
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Alex Hillman dangerouslyawes...@gmail.com
wrote:

 More importantly, the signatures themselves aren't the point. They're an
 action that someone has to take to get to know people who already care
 enough to look after the things worth protecting.


Exactly!

-- 
twb
member, Workantile http://workantile.com/
@twbrandt

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-11 Thread Alex Hillman
Back at my computer, here's that recent thread I mentioned: 

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/coworking/IHgBU9UpCDo/Maw_ilGMzqgJ

Especially, this post about ACTUAL liability 
concerns: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/coworking/IHgBU9UpCDo/uCmegDpZhesJ

-Alex

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-10 Thread Lindsey Rima
We are exploring the possibility of giving members after-hours/keyholder 
access at Link Coworking.  We would like to run a background check on new 
members looking for access during unstaffed hours.  Does anyone have a 
vendor they recommend?

Thanks,
Lindsey

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-10 Thread Tom Brandt
This seems awfully heavy-handed. Have you have had any issues with
after-hours access?

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Lindsey Rima lindseyr...@gmail.com wrote:

 We are exploring the possibility of giving members after-hours/keyholder
 access at Link Coworking.  We would like to run a background check on new
 members looking for access during unstaffed hours.  Does anyone have a
 vendor they recommend?

 Thanks,
 Lindsey

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
twb
member, Workantile http://workantile.com/
@twbrandt

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-10 Thread Susan Dorsch
Hi Lindsey,

We've had key-holding members at Office Nomads ever since we opened in
2007, and have never had a security problem (*knocks on wood*). We've never
run a security check in that time either.

Why are you considering a security check?

I'd point you to one of Alex's recent posts on security in a coworking
space - there's way more you can do with building trust amongst the
community instead of relying on some third-party to make you feel better:
http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2014/07/the-neighborhood-watch-method-for-coworking-space-security/

Susan

__
Office Nomads
officenomads.com
206-323-6500(o)
206-484-5859(m)

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Lindsey Rima lindseyr...@gmail.com wrote:

 We are exploring the possibility of giving members after-hours/keyholder
 access at Link Coworking.  We would like to run a background check on new
 members looking for access during unstaffed hours.  Does anyone have a
 vendor they recommend?

 Thanks,
 Lindsey

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-10 Thread Aaron Cruikshank
I'm going to echo the sentiments of Tom and Susan. The HiVE has been going
for years with 24/7 access for the majority of our members and we only ever
had one issue with a tenant that was (unknown to us) technically homeless
and was kind of living out of the space. We nipped that in the butt and
everything was fine. Background checks sounds heavy-handed, not to mention
expensive.

Aaron Cruikshank
Principal, CRUIKSHANK
phone: 778.908.4560
e-mail: aa...@cruikshank.me
web: cruikshank.me http://www.cruikshank.me
twitter: @cruikshank https://twitter.com/cruikshank
book a meeting: doodle.com/cruikshank http://www.doodle.com/cruikshank
linkedin: in/cruikshank http://www.linkedin.com/in/cruikshank




On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Lindsey Rima lindseyr...@gmail.com wrote:

 We are exploring the possibility of giving members after-hours/keyholder
 access at Link Coworking.  We would like to run a background check on new
 members looking for access during unstaffed hours.  Does anyone have a
 vendor they recommend?

 Thanks,
 Lindsey

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Coworking] Background Checks

2014-09-10 Thread Tom Brandt
At Workantile, all members have 24/7 access. We have electronic locks on
the doors and all members have an rfid key that lets them in. When members
join, they first do a trial membership during which they do not have keys.
We ask them to get to know the community, and the community to get to know
them, during that trial, and to get the signatures of three members who
will vouch for them as good fits for membership. Assuming they do, they get
an rfid key like everyone else. Since going to this method of onboarding
members, we have had no problems with members using the space after hours.
Typically, people who are not good fits will select themselves out, and
very occasionally we have asked a trial member to not come back. The last
time I did that was last year, when a trial member was watching hard-core
porn on his laptop right in the middle of our big open area where everyone
could see what he was watching (srsly dude, wtf?).

So rather than doing expensive, intrusive, and frequently unreliable
background checks, you might want to try other methods of building trust
between your members.



On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Aaron Cruikshank aa...@cruikshank.me
wrote:

 I'm going to echo the sentiments of Tom and Susan. The HiVE has been going
 for years with 24/7 access for the majority of our members and we only ever
 had one issue with a tenant that was (unknown to us) technically homeless
 and was kind of living out of the space. We nipped that in the butt and
 everything was fine. Background checks sounds heavy-handed, not to mention
 expensive.

 Aaron Cruikshank
 Principal, CRUIKSHANK
 phone: 778.908.4560
 e-mail: aa...@cruikshank.me
 web: cruikshank.me http://www.cruikshank.me
 twitter: @cruikshank https://twitter.com/cruikshank
 book a meeting: doodle.com/cruikshank http://www.doodle.com/cruikshank
 linkedin: in/cruikshank http://www.linkedin.com/in/cruikshank




 On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Lindsey Rima lindseyr...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 We are exploring the possibility of giving members after-hours/keyholder
 access at Link Coworking.  We would like to run a background check on new
 members looking for access during unstaffed hours.  Does anyone have a
 vendor they recommend?

 Thanks,
 Lindsey

 --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


  --
 Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Coworking group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
twb
member, Workantile http://workantile.com/
@twbrandt

-- 
Visit this forum on the web at http://discuss.coworking.com
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Coworking group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to coworking+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.