Re: Passing some torches

2016-04-04 Thread Matthew Horsfall (alh)
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:32 AM, David Golden  wrote:
> * Perl-OSType

If you want a third, I could also help maintain this.

-- Matthew Horsfall (alh)


Re: Passing some torches

2016-04-04 Thread David Golden
Thank you for offering.  I think we're well covered with Karen and Leon.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Matthew Horsfall (alh) 
wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:32 AM, David Golden  wrote:
> > * Perl-OSType
>
> If you want a third, I could also help maintain this.
>
> -- Matthew Horsfall (alh)
>



-- 
David Golden  Twitter/IRC/Github: @xdg


Re: Thoughts on Kik and NPM and implications for CPAN

2016-04-04 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:38:13PM -0400, Olaf Alders wrote:
> 
> > On Mar 24, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Neil Bowers  wrote:
> > 
> >>> PAUSE doesn’t (currently) know the river position, but if it published
> >>> a feed of deletion-schedulings, then some third-party agent could
> >>> monitor the feed and check for dists that are on river. I think those
> >>> are the dists that should be alerted to modules@ […] Obviously the
> >>> issue here is DarkPAN: a dist might not have any CPAN dependents, but
> >>> may be used plenty out in the big bad world. That’s a separate problem
> >>> :-)
> >> 
> >> I don’t think so. Plack::Middleware::Rewrite is used by a ton of people
> >> and klaxons certainly ought to ring if I ever opened up that namespace.
> >> The number of on-CPAN dependents is just 3 though.
> > 
> > The key word in what I said was *any*. I think even 3 dependents should 
> > klaxon.
> > Plus having any favourites on CPAN should also prompt the klaxon as well: I 
> > use favourites as a proxy for “has dependents” in both the adoption list 
> > and weighting dists for the PRC, and it seems to work.
> > 
> > I still think we need a service where you can say “I’m using this dist”. I 
> > think I’ll add that feature to the dashboard, which I’ll be working on at 
> > the QAH.
> 
> This would be pretty easy to bolt onto MetaCPAN.  I was already considering 
> something like this to run parallel to ++ where ++ means "I recommend this" 
> and there's some alternate symbol for saying "I use this".  This would make 
> it easy to have a script that would scan deps in apps and add them to your "I 
> use this" list in MetaCPAN.

Years ago, Léon Brocard (I think) published a script that did basically
explore your disk looking for use lines, and reported them for publication
on some dash/leaderboard.

A button for manual addition is a good first step, but something automated
might give more thorough results.

OK, I did a bit of search on use.perl.org, and I found these:
- http://use.perl.org/use.perl.org/_acme/journal/10432.html
- http://use.perl.org/use.perl.org/_acme/journal/10623.html

The service is down, but the Internet Archive has some old copies:
https://web.archive.org/web/20041010044220/http://www.astray.com/cpanstats/

> Then, if you're planning on making a controversial change to module Y,
> you have a list of users whom you can warn or poll for advice.

Preventing anonymous posts would also prevent some popularity contest
and ballot stuffing.

-- 
 Philippe Bruhat (BooK)

 Just because you do not see it does not mean it is not there.
(Moral from Groo The Wanderer #85 (Epic))