Re: [C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-04 Thread Wichert Akkerman

On 3/2/11 00:50 , Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

I think  that's a fine idea. (My guess is that it didn't make it into the
boost.python  API because it was added after the initial API had been
designed.)



That's exactly right. Boost.Python was developed when Python 2.2 had just come
out. (Boost.Python 1 was even based on 1.5.2)


Looking at the code a lot of it still assumes a pre-python 2.2 C API. 
What is the minimal python version that must be supported? If that is 
python 2.4 or later I can try to do a little cleanup and try to add some 
set wrappers.


Wichert.
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig


Re: [C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-04 Thread Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
> Looking at the code a lot of it  still assumes a pre-python 2.2 C API. What is
> the minimal python version that  must be supported? If that is python 2.4 or
> later I can try to do a little  cleanup and try to add some set  wrappers.


I'd support giving up on Python versions before 2.4.

Ralf
___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig


Re: [C++-sig] boost::python::set missing?

2011-03-04 Thread Stefan Seefeld

On 2011-03-04 11:17, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

Looking at the code a lot of it  still assumes a pre-python 2.2 C API. What is
the minimal python version that  must be supported? If that is python 2.4 or
later I can try to do a little  cleanup and try to add some set  wrappers.


I'd support giving up on Python versions before 2.4.


That seems reasonable to me, too.

Stefan

--

  ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

___
Cplusplus-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cplusplus-sig