[Crm-sig] Fwd: HW 268-278.docx
Dear All, I send my homework without Steve's reworking of the scope note(s) Best, martin -- -- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625| Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638| | Email:mar...@ics.forth.gr | | Center for Cultural Informatics | Information Systems Laboratory| Institute of Computer Science| Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, | GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site:http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl| -- HW 268-278.docx Description: MS-Word document
[Crm-sig] ISSUE: Model of plans
Dear All, I propose the following: Class Declarations *Activity Plan*** Subclass of:E29 Design or Procedure Superclass of: Scope note:This class comprises plans for some specific predefined activities or some kinds of activities to happen. They consist of descriptions of specific constraints, patterns or types of activities that could be realized. They may also foresee that the planned activities are be realized at times explicitly foreseen by the actor intending the application of the plan, for instance, to organize a conference, in which case we may talk about “active plans”. Alternatively, times of realization may be foreseen in reaction to an external kind of event foreseen by the plan, for instance a rescue action in case of earthquake according to a rescue plan, or a penal action in case of criminal activity according to a law, in which case we may talk about “reactive plans”. An instance of Activity Plan does not imply the intention of any Actor to apply it. It may be created together, before or without the will to apply it. For instance, laws are created before they are passed in the parliament. Examples: Properties: *Intention to Apply*** Subclass of:S16 State Superclass of: Scope note:This class comprises the mental state of intention or wanting to apply a particular instance of Activity Plan by a particular E39 Actor. This can be understood as the period of time that an individual or a group holds a particular will. It binds the activity plan to the actor. The intention to apply may be abandoned before the realization of the plan. When the plan is realized, the intention to apply must still exist. Characteristically, the passing of a law initiates the intention of a parliament to apply a law. In many cases, the creation of the plan initiates the intention to apply it, and in case of “active plans” the realization ends the intention. Often, the existence of the intention to apply cannot be determined other by the realization of the plan. Examples: Properties: is intention of: E31 Actor is expressed in: Expression of Intention to apply within : E61 Time Primitive initiated by: E7 Activity ended by: E7 Activity intends to apply: Activity Plan *Expression of Intention *(may be not necessary)** Subclass of:E31 Document Superclass of: Scope note:This class comprisesthe externalisation, the expression of the Intention to Apply in the form of identifiable immaterial objects, such as texts, that make propositions about these intentions. These are kind of formal texts, legal documents, proceedings, minutes etc. that document the will, the intentions of the actor. Examples: Properties: Property Declaration is intention of (has intention) Domain:Intention to Apply Range:E39 Actor Quantification:(1,n:0,n) Scope note:This property associates an instance of EXX Intention to Apply an activity plan with the actors intending it. Examples: “A Paliament regarding a law as being decided” is expressed in (has expression) Domain:Intention to Apply Range:Expression of Intention Quantification: Scope note:This property associates an Intention to Apply with the externalisation of this intention (Expression) in a document. Examples: to apply within Domain:Intention to Apply Range:E61 Time Primitive (Declarative Time-span) Quantification:(0,n:0,n) Scope note:This property associates an instance of EXX Intention to Apply with a statement of the time constraint for the actual application. This may vary with time. In case the change narrows down the time constraint, one may regard this as being simultaneously true and consistent. In case the new time constraint exceeds the previous one (typically delays), we may talk about a modification of the overall intention to apply, which could be regarded as a part of the overall intention, which continuous to be maintained. Examples:“Law XXX to be in force from 1.1.2018” initiated by (initiates) Domain:Intention to Apply Range:E7 Activity Quantification:(0,1:0,n) Scope note:This property associates the beginning of an instance of EXX Intention to Applywith an explicit activity initiating it. Often, the initiation of intention to apply is implicit in the creation of the activity plan. Examples:“Parliament XX deciding law YY” ended by(ends) Domain:Intention to Apply Range:E7 Activity Quantification:(0,1:0,n) Scope note:This property associates the end of an instance of EXX Intention to Applywith an explicit activity terminating it. Often, the termination of intention to apply is implicit in the realization of the activity plan. In other cases, it is silently forgotten Examples: *realized(is realised by)*** Domain:E7 Activity Range:Activity Plan Quantification:(0,n:0,n) Scope note:This property associates a particular instance of E7 Activity which realized an Activity Plan in a way regarded as valid by the actors intending it. (Should we r
Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks
Dear Oeyvind,
I agree with the scope note, given the interpretation we decided. I
wonder however if there is a
deeper issue here:
In Germany there exists the saying that dying Goethe uttered "mehr
Licht" ("more light"). I reused this proposition yesterday, because I
wanted to read a newspaper.
Claude Shannon defined information as a message with a known provenance,
which is the most accepted theory in computer science.
That would mean that the identity of an Information Object is a tuple
, rather than .
If we accept that, we enter another hell of arguments about what the
identity of the sender is. That is easy for a Title, but quite tricky
for the non-smoking symbol.
Question: Should we touch also this front, or are we sure that "more
light" is always "more light" ?
In other words, may be a title actually deviates from an appellation in
that it adds to its identity the provenance, which in turn allows for
translation?
best,
martin
On 24/3/2017 11:45 πμ, Øyvind Eide wrote:
Dear all,
Here is my homework for Issue 260:
1. E35: Accepted the comment made by Oyvind that the scope note of E35 Title is
misleading, since it refers to something functioning a title, not having the
form of a title, it is decided to keep the Title, to update scope note. This HW
is assigned to Oyvind
I have changed the first paragraph of the scope note
Old scope note for E35:
This class comprises the names assigned to works, such as texts, artworks or
pieces of music.
Titles are proper noun phrases or verbal phrases, and should not be confused with generic object names such as “chair”, “painting” or “book” (the latter are common nouns that stand for instances of E55 Type). Titles may be assigned by the creator of the work itself, or by a social group.
This class also comprises the translations of titles that are used as surrogates for the original titles in different social contexts.
Proposed new version:
“This class comprises textual strings that within a cultural context can be
clearly identified as titles due to their form. Being a subclass of E41
Appellation, E35 Title can only be used when such a string is actually are used
as a title of a work, such as a text, an artwork, or a piece of music.
Titles are proper noun phrases or verbal phrases, and should not be confused
with generic object names such as “chair”, “painting” or “book” (the latter are
common nouns that stand for instances of E55 Type). Titles may be assigned by
the creator of the work itself, or by a social group.
This class also comprises the translations of titles that are used as surrogates for the original titles in different social contexts.”
—
2. E49 Time Appellation: to keep but it should be merged with Date and it
should be decided if they keep the same name (Oyvind)
E50 Date should be marked obsolete. I have changed the inheritance, the first
paragraph of the scope note, and added two examples.
Old definition of E49 Time Appellation:
Subclass of : E41 Appellation
Superclass of: E50 Date
Scope Note:
This class comprises all forms of names or codes, such as historical periods
which are characteristically used to refer to a specific E52 Time-Span. This
includes human- and machine readable dates and timestamps.
The instances of E49 Time Appellation may vary in their degree of precision, and they may be relative to other time frames, “Before Christ” for example. Instances of E52 Time-Span are often defined by reference to a cultural period or an event e.g. ‘the duration of the Ming Dynasty’.
Examples:
• “Meiji” [Japanese term for a specific time-span]
• “1st half of the XX century”
• “Quaternary”
• “1215 Hegira” [a date in the Islamic calendar]
• “Last century”
New definition of E49 Time Appellation:
Subclass of : E41 Appellation
Scope Note:
This class comprises all forms of names or codes, such as historical periods,
and dates, which are characteristically used to refer to a specific E52
Time-Span.
The instances of E49 Time Appellation may vary in their degree of precision, and they may be relative to other time frames, “Before Christ” for example. Instances of E52 Time-Span are often defined by reference to a cultural period or an event e.g. ‘the duration of the Ming Dynasty’.
Examples:
• “Meiji” [Japanese term for a specific time-span]
• “1st half of the XX century”
• “Quaternary”
• “1215 Hegira” [a date in the Islamic calendar]
• “Last century”
• “2013-10-05”
• “Mon May 19 22:39:23 CET 2014”
Kind regards,
Øyvind
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
--
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625|
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638|
[Crm-sig] [crm-sig] new updated provisional agenda for the forthcoming meeting
Dear All, You may find the updated agenda in http://www.cidoc-crm.org/meeting_by_id/4150 best regards Chryssoula -- -- Chryssoula Bekiari Research and Development Engineer Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp E-mail: beki...@ics.forth.gr Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/index_main.php?l=e&c=231
[Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks
Dear all, Here is my homework for Issue 260: 1. E35: Accepted the comment made by Oyvind that the scope note of E35 Title is misleading, since it refers to something functioning a title, not having the form of a title, it is decided to keep the Title, to update scope note. This HW is assigned to Oyvind I have changed the first paragraph of the scope note Old scope note for E35: > This class comprises the names assigned to works, such as texts, artworks or > pieces of music. > > Titles are proper noun phrases or verbal phrases, and should not be confused > with generic object names such as “chair”, “painting” or “book” (the latter > are common nouns that stand for instances of E55 Type). Titles may be > assigned by the creator of the work itself, or by a social group. > > This class also comprises the translations of titles that are used as > surrogates for the original titles in different social contexts. Proposed new version: “This class comprises textual strings that within a cultural context can be clearly identified as titles due to their form. Being a subclass of E41 Appellation, E35 Title can only be used when such a string is actually are used as a title of a work, such as a text, an artwork, or a piece of music. Titles are proper noun phrases or verbal phrases, and should not be confused with generic object names such as “chair”, “painting” or “book” (the latter are common nouns that stand for instances of E55 Type). Titles may be assigned by the creator of the work itself, or by a social group. This class also comprises the translations of titles that are used as surrogates for the original titles in different social contexts.” — 2. E49 Time Appellation: to keep but it should be merged with Date and it should be decided if they keep the same name (Oyvind) E50 Date should be marked obsolete. I have changed the inheritance, the first paragraph of the scope note, and added two examples. Old definition of E49 Time Appellation: > Subclass of : E41 Appellation > Superclass of: E50 Date > > Scope Note: > > This class comprises all forms of names or codes, such as historical periods > which are characteristically used to refer to a specific E52 Time-Span. This > includes human- and machine readable dates and timestamps. > > The instances of E49 Time Appellation may vary in their degree of precision, > and they may be relative to other time frames, “Before Christ” for example. > Instances of E52 Time-Span are often defined by reference to a cultural > period or an event e.g. ‘the duration of the Ming Dynasty’. > > Examples: > • “Meiji” [Japanese term for a specific time-span] > • “1st half of the XX century” > • “Quaternary” > • “1215 Hegira” [a date in the Islamic calendar] > • “Last century” New definition of E49 Time Appellation: Subclass of : E41 Appellation Scope Note: This class comprises all forms of names or codes, such as historical periods, and dates, which are characteristically used to refer to a specific E52 Time-Span. The instances of E49 Time Appellation may vary in their degree of precision, and they may be relative to other time frames, “Before Christ” for example. Instances of E52 Time-Span are often defined by reference to a cultural period or an event e.g. ‘the duration of the Ming Dynasty’. Examples: • “Meiji” [Japanese term for a specific time-span] • “1st half of the XX century” • “Quaternary” • “1215 Hegira” [a date in the Islamic calendar] • “Last century” • “2013-10-05” • “Mon May 19 22:39:23 CET 2014” Kind regards, Øyvind
Re: [Crm-sig] provisional agenda for meeting in Crete
I will attend the meeting - all days. Chr-Emil From: Crm-sig on behalf of Chryssoula Bekiari Sent: 23 March 2017 19:03 To: crm-sig Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] provisional agenda for meeting in Crete On 23/3/2017 8:00 μμ, Chryssoula Bekiari wrote: Dear All, You may find the provisional agenda for the forthcoming meeting in http://www.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/ProvisionalAgenda%28v0%29.pdf . and the provisional list of issues to be discussed in http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Meeting/meeting-on-3-6-april-2017 Please send us any request or comment you may have about the agenda. Also please let us know about your participation in this meeting. best regards Chryssoula -- -- Chryssoula Bekiari Research and Development Engineer Center for Cultural Informatics / Information Systems Laboratory Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) N. Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-700 13 Heraklion, Crete, Greece Phone: +30 2810 391631, Fax: +30 2810 391638, Skype: xrysmp E-mail: beki...@ics.forth.gr Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/index_main.php?l=e&c=231 ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
