[Crm-sig] Issue 524

[Martin Doerr via Crm-sig]

Dear All,

Here my trial at the FOL for O19, O21. I suggest the encountered object 
may be larger than the part encountered.



O21 encountered at (witnessed encounter)

Domain: S19 Encounter Event

Range: E53 Place

Quantification:   many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)

Scope note: This property associates an instance of S19 
Encounter Event with an instance of E53 Place at which the things, which 
were encountered, were observed to be present. This may be given in 
absolute terms or in terms relative to the observed thing. The 
associated place must be within the boundaries of the E53 Place at which 
the S19 Encounter Event took place, if that has been given. *Note, that 
the encountered object may be larger and extend beyond the place of 
encounter, such as a corner of a building being excavated.*


Examples:

§  The “urn:catalog:IOL:POLY:Sphaerosyllis-levantina-ALA-IL-7-Oct.2009” 
(S19) has found at Haifa Bay (E53).


In First Order Logic:

O21(x,y) ⇒  S19(x)

O21(x,y) ⇒  E53(y)

O21(x,y) ⇒ (∃z)[ E53(z) ∧ P161(x,z) ∧ P89(y,z)]

   O21(x,y) ⇒ (∃z,v,w)[ E93(w) ∧  E18(z) ∧ 
E52(v) ∧ O19(x,z) ∧ P195(w,z) ∧ P4(x,v) ∧ P164(w,v) ∧ P197(w,y)]


 In words:

There exists a place z which is the spatial projection P161 of the 
encounter event S19, and contains P89i the place of encounter.


The presence E93 of P195 the encountered object O19 at the time E52 of 
P4 the encounter P197 covered parts of (or P167 was within ) the place 
of encounter.


*And O19:*


                           O19(x,y) ⇒  S19(x)

O19(x,y) ⇒  E18(y)

        O19(x,y) ⇒ (∃z)[ E53(z) ∧  O21(x,z)]

Best,

Martin

--

 Dr. Martin Doerr
  
 Honorary Head of the

 Center for Cultural Informatics
 
 Information Systems Laboratory

 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
  
 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,

 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
 
 Vox:+30(2810)391625

 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 274: archetypical sounds

[Дарья Юрьевна Гук via Crm-sig]

Dear colleagues,


the examples of cataloguing the audiovisual information exist, and an expert 
gave it me:
 
http://www.dapx.org/showservices.asp?ID=1003&fbclid=IwAR1MoBC2u07qVOGw5X3z2nZRjiu64SYAWDt6PQx-qlG8bRmmqkpPlo2srkE
Details: Chinese standard includes 25 positions of metadata (code of archive, 
its category, level of invenorisation, unique identifier, file numver, name of 
the scan creator, date of digital copying, date of the next 
conversion/migration, permission, notes, address of real location, original 
носитель, mode of digital copying, copying device, software and OS, name of 
file, size of file, format, video parameters, audio paremeters etc.)


Something similar was  proposed for the Russian archives.


With kind regards,
Daria Hookk

Senior Researcher of
the dept. of archaeology of
Eastern Europe and Siberia of 
the State Hermitage Museum,
PhD, ICOMOS member

E-mail: ho...@hermitage.ru
Skype: daria.hookk
https://hermitage.academia.edu/HookkDaria___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig