Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig 

YES

Le 21.06.21 à 15:47, George Bruseker via Crm-sig a écrit :

YES

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:24 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig 
mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>> wrote:


YES


Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>>:

Dear all,

This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the
specification documents of CRM family models will be produced.
The working document for this issue is here:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing



The proposed template is here:


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing



The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document.
The main change from the existing template is the inclusion of a
table for class and property dependencies to allow clear
references to other models without repeating material and while
keeping track of different versions.

The possible votes are:

  * Yes = accept/agree
  * No = do not accept/agree
  * Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.:
'Yes, but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can
write VETO, if you wish to stop the proposal, in which case
you should also write a justification and reformulate the
issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it
violates the following principle...')

Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.

All the best,

Thanasis

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr 
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr 
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

2021-06-21 Thread Francesco Beretta via Crm-sig 

YES

Le 21.06.21 à 15:48, George Bruseker via Crm-sig a écrit :

YES

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:25 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig 
mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>> wrote:


YES


Am 18.06.2021 um 11:47 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig
mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>>:

Dear all,

This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on
which CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The
working document for this issue is here:


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-PIIjXkDul1F0A7AoA4S95H0qY2CY9a7BKa1HK7wicA/edit?usp=sharing



The homework including annotated templates is here:

odt:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YtZBSx5ZCOQ5ntFUf34TY-_aeR4OIrJY/view?usp=sharing



docx:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S6ZAy7Y3TO2ndNtJNkf-NrFeMpVNnXAj/view?usp=sharing



The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the homework document.

The possible votes are:

  * Yes = accept/agree
  * No = do not accept/agree
  * Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.:
'Yes, but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can
write VETO, if you wish to stop the proposal, in which case
you should also write a justification and reformulate the
issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it
violates the following principle...')

Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.

All the best,

Thanasis

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr 
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr 
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig 
??YES

Christian-Emil

Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig 
mailto:crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>>:


Dear all,

This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification 
documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for this 
issue is here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing

The proposed template is here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing

The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main 
change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and 
property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without 
repeating material and while keeping track of different versions.

The possible votes are:

  *   Yes = accept/agree
  *   No = do not accept/agree
  *   Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, but 
there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to stop 
the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and 
reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it 
violates the following principle...')

Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.

All the best,

Thanasis

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig 
YES

From: Crm-sig  on behalf of Athanasios Velios via 
Crm-sig 
Reply to: "thana...@softicon.co.uk" 
Date: Friday, 18. June 2021 at 12:05
To: crm-sig 
Subject: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)


Dear all,

This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification 
documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for this 
issue is here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing

The proposed template is here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing

The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main 
change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and 
property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without 
repeating material and while keeping track of different versions.

The possible votes are:

  *   Yes = accept/agree
  *   No = do not accept/agree
  *   Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, but 
there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to stop 
the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and 
reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it 
violates the following principle...')

Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.

All the best,

Thanasis
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig 
YES

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:24 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> YES
>
> Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
> crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification
> documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for
> this issue is here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The proposed template is here:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing
>
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main
> change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and
> property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without
> repeating material and while keeping track of different versions.
>
> The possible votes are:
>
>- Yes = accept/agree
>- No = do not accept/agree
>- Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes,
>but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish
>to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification
>and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because
>it violates the following principle...')
>
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
>
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

2021-06-21 Thread George Bruseker via Crm-sig 
YES

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:25 PM Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> YES
>
> Am 18.06.2021 um 11:47 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
> crm-sig@ics.forth.gr>:
>
> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which
> CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document
> for this issue is here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-PIIjXkDul1F0A7AoA4S95H0qY2CY9a7BKa1HK7wicA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The homework including annotated templates is here:
>
> odt:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YtZBSx5ZCOQ5ntFUf34TY-_aeR4OIrJY/view?usp=sharing
>
> docx:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S6ZAy7Y3TO2ndNtJNkf-NrFeMpVNnXAj/view?usp=sharing
>
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the homework document.
>
> The possible votes are:
>
>- Yes = accept/agree
>- No = do not accept/agree
>- Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes,
>but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish
>to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification
>and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because
>it violates the following principle...')
>
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
>
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

2021-06-21 Thread Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig 
YES

> Am 18.06.2021 um 11:47 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig 
> :
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which 
> CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document for 
> this issue is here:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-PIIjXkDul1F0A7AoA4S95H0qY2CY9a7BKa1HK7wicA/edit?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> The homework including annotated templates is here:
> 
> odt: 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YtZBSx5ZCOQ5ntFUf34TY-_aeR4OIrJY/view?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> docx: 
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S6ZAy7Y3TO2ndNtJNkf-NrFeMpVNnXAj/view?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the homework document.
> The possible votes are:
> 
> Yes = accept/agree
> No = do not accept/agree
> Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, but there 
> is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to stop the 
> proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and reformulate 
> the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it violates the 
> following principle...')
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig 
YES

> Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig 
> :
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification 
> documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for 
> this issue is here:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> The proposed template is here:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing
>  
> 
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main 
> change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and 
> property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without 
> repeating material and while keeping track of different versions.
> The possible votes are:
> 
> Yes = accept/agree
> No = do not accept/agree
> Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes, but there 
> is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish to stop the 
> proposal, in which case you should also write a justification and reformulate 
> the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because it violates the 
> following principle...')
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

2021-06-21 Thread Donatella Fiorani via Crm-sig 
Yes

Il giorno ven 18 giu 2021 alle ore 12:02 Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> ha scritto:

> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification
> documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for
> this issue is here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N09On4q4j4c8mIvSfMZTsWk-vsUIkdn2jRIzBlW8smU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The proposed template is here:
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xWq1SIcoSNMmmwpO3TfE6LTC9cYsRapy/view?usp=sharing
>
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the template document. The main
> change from the existing template is the inclusion of a table for class and
> property dependencies to allow clear references to other models without
> repeating material and while keeping track of different versions.
>
> The possible votes are:
>
>- Yes = accept/agree
>- No = do not accept/agree
>- Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes,
>but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish
>to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification
>and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because
>it violates the following principle...')
>
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>


-- 
prof. arch. Donatella Fiorani
Ordinario di Restauro Architettonico
'Sapienza' Università di Roma
Dipartimento di Storia, Disegno e Restauro dell'Architettura
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

2021-06-21 Thread Donatella Fiorani via Crm-sig 
Yes


Mail
priva di virus. www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

Il giorno ven 18 giu 2021 alle ore 11:51 Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> ha scritto:

> Dear all,
>
> This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which
> CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document
> for this issue is here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-PIIjXkDul1F0A7AoA4S95H0qY2CY9a7BKa1HK7wicA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> The homework including annotated templates is here:
>
> odt:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YtZBSx5ZCOQ5ntFUf34TY-_aeR4OIrJY/view?usp=sharing
>
> docx:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S6ZAy7Y3TO2ndNtJNkf-NrFeMpVNnXAj/view?usp=sharing
>
> The vote is to decide on whether to adopt the homework document.
>
> The possible votes are:
>
>- Yes = accept/agree
>- No = do not accept/agree
>- Other = With other you can either introduce a caveat (e.g.: 'Yes,
>but there is a typo on word x, fix it.') or you can write VETO, if you wish
>to stop the proposal, in which case you should also write a justification
>and reformulate the issue (e.g.: 'VETO, this change is unacceptable because
>it violates the following principle...')
>
> Please send your e-votes by the 28th of June.
>
> All the best,
>
> Thanasis
> ___
> Crm-sig mailing list
> Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>


-- 
prof. arch. Donatella Fiorani
Ordinario di Restauro Architettonico
'Sapienza' Università di Roma
Dipartimento di Storia, Disegno e Restauro dell'Architettura
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig