[Crm-sig] Where to find all the .1s

[George Bruseker via Crm-sig]

Dear all,

I am wondering if we should have somewhere in the main document where
you can find all the .1 properties. Presently, to my knowledge, there is no
index of where these properties are. For those that use the .1 properties
it is difficult to find them all using the specification document. One
cannot search for '.1' as this returns too many results.

What do people think?

Best,

George
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294 (CRMarchaeo)

[George Bruseker via Crm-sig]

Yes, to the reformulated text.

With this caveat, that the underlined in the formulation, " This property
associates a kind of object (documented as an instance of E55) to an
instance of E4 Period *for indicating that* objects of this kind have been
generated within this period," sounds stylistically  awkward. Could just
switch out for 'in order to indicate that'?

Best,

George

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 2:47 PM Hiebel, Gerald via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:

> YES
>
> Best,
>
> Gerald
>
>
>
> *From: *Crm-sig  on behalf of Martin Doerr
> via Crm-sig 
> *Reply to: *Martin Doerr 
> *Date: *Monday, 21. March 2022 at 12:44
> *To: *"crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" 
> *Subject: *Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for scope note part of issue 294
> (CRMarchaeo)
>
>
>
> TES!
>
> Martin
>
> On 3/21/2022 1:24 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> As the issue number indicates issue 294 has been with for a while.
>
> In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd
> FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig accepted MD's proposal to
> change the quantification of  *appears in*, *restricted to*, *typical
> for *to *many-to-many, *as well as redraft their scope notes. The
> properties will be assigned the following AP numbers:
>
>- AP29 appears in
>- AP30 restricted to
>- AP31 typical for
>
> The new scope notes  are
> working definitions. The relations among types (issue 407
> )
> be taken into account, together with skos and other standards.
>
> HW: SdS to edit them.
>
> The edited version of the scope notes can be found here (and copied in a
> the end of this email:
>
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1qS8aBP3UVLGn-WAXH6aH2vZp4wy1ME3t
>
>
>
> You are invited to vote on the scope note texts (not the name of the
> inverses which will be a separate e-vote)
>
>
>
> YES if you accept the edited texts
>
> NO if you don't accept the edited texts
>
> VETO if you think a e-vote is not ok at the current state
>
>
>
> The voting is open until 4th April.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Christian-Emil
>
>
>
>
>
> 294: E55 Type relations
>
> The SdS edits. The original text is highlighted in Yellow to make it
> easier to follow the differences.
>
>
>
> OLD
>
> AP29 appears in
>
> Domain: E55 Type
>
> Range: E4 Period
>
> Subproperty:
>
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
>
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
>
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have been generated within
> this period. The
>
> generation of such objects may be the result of human, biological,
> geological or other processes.
>
> This property makes a weak statement with regards to the distribution of
> the class of object in the
>
> archaeological record, but also in geological or paleontological
> observations: If the genesis of an
>
> object of this type can plausibly be assumed to fall within the genesis of
> the context in which it
>
> was found, then the statement made with this property would support
> reasoning, ceteris paribus,
>
> that the genesis period of the find context forms part of or overlaps with
> one of the instance of E4
>
> Period in which the respective object type has appeared.
>
> Stronger claims can be made using ‘typical for’ and ‘restricted to’
> properties.
>
>
>
> NEW
>
> AP29 appears in
>
> Domain: E55 Type
>
> Range: E4 Period
>
> Subproperty:
>
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
>
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an
> instance of E55 Type) with an
>
> instance of E4 Period indicating that objects of this kind have been
> brought into existence during
>
> this period. The genesis of such objects may be the result of human,
> biological, geological or other
>
> processes.
>
> This property makes a weak statement about the distribution of the
> associated object kind in the
>
> archaeological record: that is, if the genesis of an object of the type
> can plausibly be assumed to
>
> fall within the genesis of the context within which it was found, then
> this property supports
>
> reasoning, ceteris paribus, that the genesis period of the context forms
> part of, or overlaps with,
>
> one of the instances of E4 Period in which the respective object type has
> appeared. Such weak
>
> statements may also be useful in the context of geological or
> paleontological observations.
>
> Stronger claims can be made using the properties AP30 restricted to and
> AP31 typical for.
>
>
>
> OLD
>
> AP30 restricted to
>
> Domain: E55 Type
>
> Range: E4 Period
>
> Subproperty: appears in
>
> Quantification: many-to-many (0,n:0,n)
>
> Scope note: This property associates a kind of object (documented as an
> instance of E55) to an instance of E4
>
> Period for indicating that objects of this kind have exclusively been
> generated in this