Here is my homework for issue 248. What should be done was: “a) ::Put a comment into the introduction of CRM that same label is used if the substance of the property is regarded to be the same, but different constraints apply to their use with a specific class, such as Parts of a period must be periods etc. (to be elaborated by Øyvind)”
My comment for the introduction is: “In CIDOC-CRM the names of labels cannot be used to infer their meaning. Only the full description including scope notes, context of use, and examples can provide the necessary semantic for understanding an entity or a property. Thus, if two entities or properties have the same name, such as P5 consists of and P9 consists of, this does not imply an identity between the two entities or properties. In such cases their substance are seen as similar but their contexts of use are different. P5 and P9 are distinguished by their different domains and ranges which situates them in different contexts, thus give them different meanings.” Best, Øyvind
