Re: [Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: [Sci] Labels of O19, O21

[Martin Doerr]

I support this!:-)

Martin

On 3/6/2020 1:56 AM, Robert Sanderson wrote:


Dear all,

At a recent Linked Art meeting we discussed how to model “find 
events”, and S19 and O19 were agreed upon as the correct modeling 
constructs.  We also discussed why S19 is an “encounter” rather than a 
“find” or “discovery”, as is very well described in the scope notes 
for the class.


However, the properties of S19 would benefit from some attention 
towards consistency.  If S19 is encountering, then it seems 
counterproductive to have O19 as being “has found object” and O21 “has 
found at”, undoing all the good culturally sensitive work of explained 
in S19.


I would propose that O19 and 21 be relabeled to “encountered object 
(was object encountered by)” and “encountered at (witnessed encounter)”.


Many thanks for your consideration,

Rob

--

*Dr. Robert Sanderson*, **Semantic Architect  |  Getty Digital  | 
getty.edu 


signature_1632129958


___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



--

 Dr. Martin Doerr
  
 Honorary Head of the

 Center for Cultural Informatics
 
 Information Systems Laboratory

 Institute of Computer Science
 Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
  
 N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,

 GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
 
 Vox:+30(2810)391625

 Email: mar...@ics.forth.gr
 Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl

___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig

[Crm-sig] NEW ISSUE: [Sci] Labels of O19, O21

[Robert Sanderson]

Dear all,

At a recent Linked Art meeting we discussed how to model “find events”, and S19 
and O19 were agreed upon as the correct modeling constructs.  We also discussed 
why S19 is an “encounter” rather than a “find” or “discovery”, as is very well 
described in the scope notes for the class.

However, the properties of S19 would benefit from some attention towards 
consistency.  If S19 is encountering, then it seems counterproductive to have 
O19 as being “has found object” and O21 “has found at”, undoing all the good 
culturally sensitive work of explained in S19.

I would propose that O19 and 21 be relabeled to “encountered object (was object 
encountered by)” and “encountered at (witnessed encounter)”.

Many thanks for your consideration,

Rob

--
Dr. Robert Sanderson,  Semantic Architect  |  Getty Digital  |  
getty.edu
[signature_1632129958]
___
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig