Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Ed Willink]

Hi Christian

IIRC when we moved to the three monthly cadence, some projects made 
clear from the outset that they would skip at least one of the 
milestones. On this occasion the platform has skipped M2 as originally 
planned. The M2 EPPs are therefore out but with M1 platform/JDT content.


    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 06/05/2022 06:46, Christian Dietrich wrote:

i mean the milestone 2 jonah is talking about


Am 06.05.22 um 07:44 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:

m2? Do you mean p2? p2 is in the SDK, m2 not.

Am 6. Mai 2022 07:37:49 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich 
:

i dont see m2 there

Am 06.05.22 um 07:37 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:
Still here, since ever: 
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/


Am 6. Mai 2022 07:35:23 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich 
:

where can one find "eclipse sdk" downloads nowadays?
google does not seem to help

Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham 
 wrote:



  OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do:

  1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both end up there. I
  assume that it will be the Orbit one because it is more 
recent as

  far as p2 is concerned (not sure, just best guess).


In 4.24 SDK there is the Maven version of asm and asm.tree.
In 2022-06 M2 p2 repo there is Maven version of asm.tree (from 
platform p2 repo) and Orbit version of asm (from Xtext's p2 repo)


  2- Starting from the SDK, does installing features from SimRel
  cause both to be installed, and if so, are both resolved.


Starting with M2 SDK, installing Xtext SDK from 2022-06 M2 simrel 
causes asm.tree from Orbit to be installed:


osgi> ss org.objectweb.asm
"Framework is launched."


id State       Bundle
283 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
374 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
Both versions of asm are in my plugins directory after installing 
xtext:


$ ll eclipse/plugins/*asm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah 122176 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jonah jonah 136049 May  5 19:57 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah  52669 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0.jar


So is that OK?

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 


--
Kind regards,
Andrey Loskutov

https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov
Спасение утопающих - дело рук самих утопающих
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



--
Kind regards,
Andrey Loskutov

https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov
Спасение утопающих - дело рук самих утопающих
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Ed Merks]

No, that's not quite right:

https://git.eclipse.org/c/simrel/org.eclipse.simrel.build.git/commit/?id=fc113c1b5911f236d02ca8cbae6cae6d0b71c93d

The platform doesn't do a full freeze and test cycle for m2 but it still 
contributes to m2.


On 06.05.2022 09:27, Ed Willink wrote:

Hi Christian

IIRC when we moved to the three monthly cadence, some projects made 
clear from the outset that they would skip at least one of the 
milestones. On this occasion the platform has skipped M2 as originally 
planned. The M2 EPPs are therefore out but with M1 platform/JDT content.


    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 06/05/2022 06:46, Christian Dietrich wrote:

i mean the milestone 2 jonah is talking about


Am 06.05.22 um 07:44 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:

m2? Do you mean p2? p2 is in the SDK, m2 not.

Am 6. Mai 2022 07:37:49 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich 
:

i dont see m2 there

Am 06.05.22 um 07:37 schrieb Andrey Loskutov:
Still here, since ever: 
https://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/


Am 6. Mai 2022 07:35:23 MESZ schrieb Christian Dietrich 
:

where can one find "eclipse sdk" downloads nowadays?
google does not seem to help

Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham 
 wrote:



  OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do:

  1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both end up there. I
  assume that it will be the Orbit one because it is more 
recent as

  far as p2 is concerned (not sure, just best guess).


In 4.24 SDK there is the Maven version of asm and asm.tree.
In 2022-06 M2 p2 repo there is Maven version of asm.tree (from 
platform p2 repo) and Orbit version of asm (from Xtext's p2 repo)


  2- Starting from the SDK, does installing features from 
SimRel

  cause both to be installed, and if so, are both resolved.


Starting with M2 SDK, installing Xtext SDK from 2022-06 M2 
simrel causes asm.tree from Orbit to be installed:


osgi> ss org.objectweb.asm
"Framework is launched."


id State       Bundle
283 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
374 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
Both versions of asm are in my plugins directory after 
installing xtext:


$ ll eclipse/plugins/*asm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah 122176 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jonah jonah 136049 May  5 19:57 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah  52669 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0.jar


So is that OK?

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev 


--
Kind regards,
Andrey Loskutov

https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov
Спасение утопающих - дело рук самих утопающих
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



--
Kind regards,
Andrey Loskutov

https://www.eclipse.org/user/aloskutov
Спасение утопающих - дело рук самих утопающих
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev





___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Ed Merks]

Jonah,

I suspect it's okay, but it's definitely a bit confusing.

I believe the eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar is present 
because it hasn't been garbage collected yet.  As your console 
indicates, only the Orbit version is resolved and the About dialog shows 
that too:


We see here too that the direct-from-maven bundles generally have poor 
provider/name information.


These are the org.objectweb.asm.* bundles in the latest 
2022-06/202205061000, i.e., a bunch of duplicate 9.2.0 versions, but for 
9.3.0, only the Orbit version of org.objectweb.asm along with the 
platform's version of org.objectweb.asm.tree.


Why are these all there in the first place?

This view shows each duplicate org.objectweb.asm.* with nested 
capabilities filtered to those to which a requirement is resolved that 
is exclusively resolved only to that specific IU's capability.


So we can see that org.objectweb.asm.tree is present only because PDE 
requires it.  We can see that Xtext and Platform require the 9.3 version 
and while the Eclipse does not preclude a 9.4 version, Xtext's bundle 
requirements do exclude 9.4.  I wonder if there is a good reason for to 
exclude 9.4?


We can also see that ECF, EclEmma, and Linux Tools will need to take 
action to eliminate the 9.2 versions.  I wonder if they are paying 
attention?


It would seem better to me if the Platform used the Orbit versions to 
keep things more consistent...


Regards,
Ed

On 06.05.2022 02:08, Jonah Graham wrote:


On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham  wrote:


OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do:

1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both end up there. I
assume that it will be the Orbit one because it is more recent as
far as p2 is concerned (not sure, just best guess).


In 4.24 SDK there is the Maven version of asm and asm.tree.
In 2022-06 M2 p2 repo there is Maven version of asm.tree (from 
platform p2 repo) and Orbit version of asm (from Xtext's p2 repo)


2- Starting from the SDK, does installing features from SimRel
cause both to be installed, and if so, are both resolved.


Starting with M2 SDK, installing Xtext SDK from 2022-06 M2 simrel 
causes asm.tree from Orbit to be installed:


osgi> ss org.objectweb.asm
"Framework is launched."


id State       Bundle
283 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
374 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
Both versions of asm are in my plugins directory after installing xtext:

$ ll eclipse/plugins/*asm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah 122176 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jonah jonah 136049 May  5 19:57 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah  52669 Apr 28 19:00 
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0.jar


So is that OK?

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Jonah Graham]

On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 05:39, Ed Merks  wrote:

> Jonah,
>
> I suspect it's okay, but it's definitely a bit confusing.
>

Thanks Ed.


>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Jonah Graham]

Thanks Christian.

I think we have ended up in the same place - not sure why p2 is preferring
the Orbit one for .asm and Maven one for .asm.tree - but as long as only
one of each is resolved I am ok with it.

Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com


On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 01:56, Christian Dietrich <
christian.dietr...@itemis.de> wrote:

> interestingly i end up with
>
> idState   Bundle
> 285RESOLVEDorg.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
> 377RESOLVEDorg.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
> osgi>
>
>
> Am 06.05.22 um 07:47 schrieb Christian Dietrich:
>
> https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/202205061000/plugins/
> has asm tree from maven but no asm from maven but asm from orbit instead
>
> Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham:
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham  wrote:
>
>>
>> OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do:
>>
>> 1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both end up there. I assume that
>> it will be the Orbit one because it is more recent as far as p2 is
>> concerned (not sure, just best guess).
>>
>
> In 4.24 SDK there is the Maven version of asm and asm.tree.
> In 2022-06 M2 p2 repo there is Maven version of asm.tree (from platform p2
> repo) and Orbit version of asm (from Xtext's p2 repo)
>
>
>> 2- Starting from the SDK, does installing features from SimRel cause both
>> to be installed, and if so, are both resolved.
>>
>
> Starting with M2 SDK, installing Xtext SDK from 2022-06 M2 simrel causes
> asm.tree from Orbit to be installed:
>
> osgi> ss org.objectweb.asm
> "Framework is launched."
>
>
> id State   Bundle
> 283 RESOLVEDorg.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
> 374 RESOLVEDorg.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
>
> Both versions of asm are in my plugins directory after installing xtext:
>
> $ ll eclipse/plugins/*asm*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah 122176 Apr 28 19:00
> eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 jonah jonah 136049 May  5 19:57
> eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah  52669 Apr 28 19:00
> eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0.jar
>
> So is that OK?
>
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing listcross-project-issues-...@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
>
> Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle,
> Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann
> Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus (Vors./chairman), Harald
> Goertz, Eric Swehla
> Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch 15-24, 44536 Lünen
> (Germany)
> Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund | HRB 20621
> ___
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

[cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: [epp-dev] EPP 2022-06 M2

[Ed Merks]

FYI


 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Re: [epp-dev] EPP 2022-06 M2
Date:   Fri, 6 May 2022 10:00:39 -0400
From:   Eric Poirier 
Reply-To:   Eclipse Packaging Project 
To: Eclipse Packaging Project 



Hi everyone,

The 2022-06 M2 release has been published.

https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/release/2022-06/m2

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Eric

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 8:52 AM Markus Knauer  
wrote:


   +1 for RCP/RAP

   (Although I found some minor issues, such as #7
    or #9
   
   which we'll be fixing until M3.)

   Thanks and regards
   Markus


   On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 14:48, Jonah Graham 
   wrote:

   +1 for CPP

   But a few issues/questions were raised:
   https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=579849 - lots of
   NPE when closing the IDE

   https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.ui/issues/60
   - NPE when changing Eclipse theme

   https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg19158.html
   - ASM versions


   ~~~
   Jonah Graham
   Kichwa Coders
   www.kichwacoders.com 


   On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 23:13, Jonah Graham
wrote:

   Hi everyone,

   Our next milestone build is available for testing: EPP
   2022-06 M2

   /No special issues to report!/

   I have been following the steps on
   https://hackmd.io/@jonahgraham/eclipse-epp-release-process -
   you can see the checkmarks as to what is done.

   Download link:
   
https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/downloads/release/2022-06/M2/_mirrors.php

   EPP was built with the p2 repositories at:

   https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/202205061000/ and
   
https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/2022-06/202205051200/

   Please test and send your +1 to this mailing list. +1s are
   optional as the package will be published anyway.

   Last +1 received for each package and platform (apologies if
   I missed one of your +1 emails, just let me know and I will
   update Last Recorded +1)

   Packages:
   committers - 2021-12 RC2 (tested by Ed in 2022-03 RC2)
   cpp - 2022-06 M1
   dsl - 2022-03 RC1
   embedcpp - 2022-03 RC2
   java - 2022-03 M1
   jee - 2022-03 M2
   modeling - 2021-12 RC2 (tested by Ed in 2022-03 RC2)
   parallel - 2022-03 RC2
   php - 2020-12 RC2 (tested by Ed in 2022-03 RC2)
   rcp - 2021-12 RC2 (tested by Ed in 2022-03 RC2)
   scout - 2022-03 RC2

   Platforms:
   Linux x86_64 - 2022-06 M1
   Linux aarch64 - 2021-09 RC1
   Windows - 2022-03 RC2
   macOS x86_64 - 2022-03 RC2
   macOS aarch64 - 2022-03 RC2

   Thank you for testing!

   Regards,
   Jonah
   ~~~
   Jonah Graham
   Kichwa Coders
   www.kichwacoders.com 

   ___
   epp-dev mailing list
   epp-...@eclipse.org
   To unsubscribe from this list, visit
   https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev



   -- 


   ### EclipseSource Group Telefon: +49 721 664733-0 (UTC +1) Telefax:
   +49 721 66473329 http://eclipsesource.com
   Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH Lammstrasse 21, 76133 Karlsruhe
   Germany General Manager: Jochen Krause Registered Office: Karlsruhe,
   Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883

   ___
   epp-dev mailing list
   epp-...@eclipse.org
   To unsubscribe from this list, visit
   https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev



--

Eric Poirier

Web Developer | Eclipse Foundation

Eclipse Foundation : The Community for Open 
Innovation and Collaboration


___
epp-dev mailing list
epp-...@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Two versions of ASM 9.3.0

[Ed Merks]

FYI, opened this PR to switch the platform to use the Orbit versions:

https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.releng.aggregator/pull/257

On 06.05.2022 16:09, Jonah Graham wrote:

Thanks Christian.

I think we have ended up in the same place - not sure why p2 is 
preferring the Orbit one for .asm and Maven one for .asm.tree - but as 
long as only one of each is resolved I am ok with it.


Jonah

~~~
Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders
www.kichwacoders.com 


On Fri, 6 May 2022 at 01:56, Christian Dietrich 
 wrote:


interestingly i end up with

id    State   Bundle
285    RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
377    RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
osgi>


Am 06.05.22 um 07:47 schrieb Christian Dietrich:


https://download.eclipse.org/releases/2022-06/202205061000/plugins/
has asm tree from maven but no asm from maven but asm from orbit
instead

Am 06.05.22 um 02:08 schrieb Jonah Graham:


On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 at 18:26, Jonah Graham
 wrote:


OK - in that case we have some specific SimRel testing to do:

1- Which bundles ends up SimRel - or do both end up there. I
assume that it will be the Orbit one because it is more
recent as far as p2 is concerned (not sure, just best guess).


In 4.24 SDK there is the Maven version of asm and asm.tree.
In 2022-06 M2 p2 repo there is Maven version of asm.tree (from
platform p2 repo) and Orbit version of asm (from Xtext's p2 repo)

2- Starting from the SDK, does installing features from
SimRel cause both to be installed, and if so, are both resolved.


Starting with M2 SDK, installing Xtext SDK from 2022-06 M2
simrel causes asm.tree from Orbit to be installed:

osgi> ss org.objectweb.asm
"Framework is launched."


id State       Bundle
283 RESOLVED    org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0
374 RESOLVED  org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157
Both versions of asm are in my plugins directory after
installing xtext:

$ ll eclipse/plugins/*asm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah 122176 Apr 28 19:00
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.jar
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jonah jonah 136049 May  5 19:57
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm_9.3.0.v20220409-0157.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 jonah jonah  52669 Apr 28 19:00
eclipse/plugins/org.objectweb.asm.tree_9.3.0.jar

So is that OK?

___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Vorstand/Board: Jens Wagener (Vors./chairman), Dr. Stephan Eberle,
Abdelghani El-Kacimi, Wolfgang Neuhaus, Franz-Josef Schuermann
Aufsichtsrat/Supervisory Board: Michael Neuhaus (Vors./chairman),
Harald Goertz, Eric Swehla
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Am Brambusch 15-24, 44536
Lünen (Germany)
Registergericht/Registry Court: Amtsgericht Dortmund | HRB 20621
___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, 
visithttps://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev___
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev