Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Dates
Hi Wayne and all, Thank you so much for your support. We will check and update the aggregation file, etc.. Many thanks, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-3808-5252 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: Wayne Beaton To: Cross project issues Date: 2018/01/23 04:44 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Dates Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org According to the process, we need to have approval from the Eclipse Planning Council to add the project after the M4 opt-in deadline. We're far enough away from that deadline, that I'd like to get council approval to include the project. I don't anticipate that this will be problematic. I'll present this to the Eclipse Planning Council on behalf of the Eclipse Technology PMC. I'm pretty sure that ACTF is not included in any packages, so the bitness of the contributions shouldn't be an issue. Please correct me if I'm wrong. AFAICT, we haven't removed Eclipse ACTF from the build. The aggregation file will have to updated to pull in the most recent builds. Sooner is better than later. Thanks, Wayne On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Kentarou Fukuda wrote: Hi all, Excuse me for this last-minute notice, but if possible ACTF would like to contribute 1.6.0 to Photon (Offset +3). https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.6.0/ Currently, ACTF only supports 32 bit version. We will continue support for it based on this 1.6.0 release, and will switch to 64 bit version. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-3808-5252 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: Wayne Beaton To: Cross project issues Date: 2018/01/12 02:00 Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Dates Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org For those project teams that are participating in the Photon Simultaneous Release, please pay attention to these dates. December 15/2017 - Opt-in deadline January 22/2018 - Non participating projects will be disabled from the build February 16/2018 - CQ Submission deadline (specify that the CQ is required for Photon) May 25/2018 - IP Log submission deadline June 06/2018 - Review materials due June 13/2018 - First round of release reviews (aim for this date if you can) June 20/2018 - Second (final?) round of release reviews June 27/2018 - Eclipse Photon GA Note the January 22/2018 date to remove non participating projects from the build. If any of the projects that have not opted-in are on your critical path, you need to speak up. The list of projects that are now considered to have dropped from the release are in the "Overview" block on the right side of the Photon release page. I'm concerned that Subversive in on that list. My sense is that Subversive dropping out of the simultaneous release will have a significant negative impact on our user community. If you have cycles to dedicate to shepherding Subversive through the simultaneous release, please let me know ASAP. Or, you could weigh in (or possibly volunteer) on my crazy idea to consolidate some of our mature but understaffed projects into consolidated project. I do realize that the IP Log review date may seem a little early. The fact is that it does take considerable time for me to confirm that the content being delivered matches the CQ record. Note that an IP Log is a record of intellectual property for an entire project. The purpose of the IP Log review is to confirm that the project team understands the Eclipse IP Policy and is implementing the supporting processes. An IP Log is not intended to reflect the intellectual property included with any particular release. So, yes, you can continue to accept contributions after submitting the IP Log for review. No, you don't need to resubmit the IP Log for re-review if you accept a contribution. If you do make significant changes to your third-party content or are otherwise concerned that the intellectual property for the project integrity may have been compromised after you've already submitted the log, let me know and we'll sort it out. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects The Eclipse Foundation___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dev.eclipse.org_mailman_listinfo_cross-2Dproject-2Dissues-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=K-1NWweLLNE2LUybt3bDlydXonTZ2br30IhpNYqS0Mo&m=cFF7at9SgIrja97Kq94_cAeI3-_KgSrL6665plvE5W4&s=4DXXXG-LGh_hynWBjivXUSyUbtbbFpqbm6j9unNtZ4E&e= ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Dates
Hi all, Excuse me for this last-minute notice, but if possible ACTF would like to contribute 1.6.0 to Photon (Offset +3). https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.6.0/ Currently, ACTF only supports 32 bit version. We will continue support for it based on this 1.6.0 release, and will switch to 64 bit version. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-3808-5252 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: Wayne Beaton To: Cross project issues Date: 2018/01/12 02:00 Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Simultaneous Release Dates Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org For those project teams that are participating in the Photon Simultaneous Release, please pay attention to these dates. December 15/2017 - Opt-in deadline January 22/2018 - Non participating projects will be disabled from the build February 16/2018 - CQ Submission deadline (specify that the CQ is required for Photon) May 25/2018 - IP Log submission deadline June 06/2018 - Review materials due June 13/2018 - First round of release reviews (aim for this date if you can) June 20/2018 - Second (final?) round of release reviews June 27/2018 - Eclipse Photon GA Note the January 22/2018 date to remove non participating projects from the build. If any of the projects that have not opted-in are on your critical path, you need to speak up. The list of projects that are now considered to have dropped from the release are in the "Overview" block on the right side of the Photon release page. I'm concerned that Subversive in on that list. My sense is that Subversive dropping out of the simultaneous release will have a significant negative impact on our user community. If you have cycles to dedicate to shepherding Subversive through the simultaneous release, please let me know ASAP. Or, you could weigh in (or possibly volunteer) on my crazy idea to consolidate some of our mature but understaffed projects into consolidated project. I do realize that the IP Log review date may seem a little early. The fact is that it does take considerable time for me to confirm that the content being delivered matches the CQ record. Note that an IP Log is a record of intellectual property for an entire project. The purpose of the IP Log review is to confirm that the project team understands the Eclipse IP Policy and is implementing the supporting processes. An IP Log is not intended to reflect the intellectual property included with any particular release. So, yes, you can continue to accept contributions after submitting the IP Log for review. No, you don't need to resubmit the IP Log for re-review if you accept a contribution. If you do make significant changes to your third-party content or are otherwise concerned that the intellectual property for the project integrity may have been compromised after you've already submitted the log, let me know and we'll sort it out. Wayne -- Wayne Beaton Director of Open Source Projects The Eclipse Foundation___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dev.eclipse.org_mailman_listinfo_cross-2Dproject-2Dissues-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=K-1NWweLLNE2LUybt3bDlydXonTZ2br30IhpNYqS0Mo&m=cFF7at9SgIrja97Kq94_cAeI3-_KgSrL6665plvE5W4&s=4DXXXG-LGh_hynWBjivXUSyUbtbbFpqbm6j9unNtZ4E&e= ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] ACTF participation to Oxygen
Hi all, ACTF will contribute 1.5.0 to Oxygen (Offset +3). https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.5.0 Excuse me for this last mintute paticipation announcement. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-3808-5252 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] ACTF participation to Neon
Hi, ACTF will contribute 1.4.0 to Neon (Offset +3). https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.4.0 Many thanks, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-3808-5252 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] ACTF Project Participation in Mars
Hi, The technology ACTF project will be participating in the Mars simultaneous release train with an offset of +3. The release document can be found at: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.3.0 Many thanks, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
[cross-project-issues-dev] ACTF participation in Luna release
Hi, The ACTF (Accessibility Tools Framework) project will participate in the Luna release train with its 1.2 release. ACTF is a +3 offset project. The release record is here: https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.actf/releases/1.2.0 Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!
Excuse me, but I missed to sync our latest ACTF aggrcon file to repository. I now corrected it. (including removing enabled="false") Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: David M Williams To: Cross project issues Date: 2012/06/14 06:41 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno! Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Ah ... estimate high so you can deliver ahead of schedule, eh? :) I stopped the build that was in progress, since it will had an hour or more to finish. With any luck, we'll have a new 'staging' repo about 7:30. [If anyone from emf.query2 or modeling can quickly fix that problem, let me know, and I'll restart the build again ... if its before 6:30 AM or so. Otherwise, will let current one finish.] Thanks, From:Holger Staudacher To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 05:31 PM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno! Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi David, the RTP build is done and contributed to the aggregator. The repository is tested and from my point of view everything looks fine. Hope everything works as expected :) Cheers Holger On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:10 PM, David M Williams wrote: Ok, ... about 6:15 PM Eastern? The previous build failed due to emf.query2 problem (bug 381786) so I'll disable that and there will be just about enough time to try a respin before 6:15 ... so, heck ... take till 6:30. :) From:Holger Staudacher To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 04:45 PM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno! Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Or in an hour and a half. I just landed at the airport. Give me some time until I find a sufficient network connection (eclipse p2 repositories need speed) ;) Sorry for the delay. Cheers Holger On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Ralf Sternberg wrote: The old org.eclipse.rap bundles come from RTP. Holger will update the RTP contribution in about an hour. Regards, Ralf On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Hübner wrote: Am 13.06.2012 um 16:13 schrieb Ralf Sternberg: For the duplicate org.eclipse.rap.* bundles, 1.5.0.20120612-1458 our RC4 contribution, 20120605-1606 is RC3. I guess someone depending on the rap runtime has not picked up the RC4 yet, could that be EMF? We include any rap bundles or features, therefore we have any prefect match dependencies to rap. Just filter the latest rap version and look which project fails to validate (b3 editor). Or grep for Provided Capabilities org.eclipse.rap* in b3aggr files. Regards, Dennis. The duplicate org.eclipse.jetty.xml bundles come from the rap tools. For some reason, they contain the RC3 version of these bundles. I will re-build the rap tools and contribute them to the aggregator. But since no one depends on them, this should not affect any other project. Thanks for pointing out these problems! Ralf On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, John Arthorne wrote: David Williams wrote on 06/12/2012 05:15:26 PM: I appreciate everyone keeping the "build green" and making progress on the "sim rel reports" [1], though there are a few serious issues left there. [1] http://build.eclipse.org/juno/simrel/reporeports/ I looked through these, and at this point I think most of them are not blocking the release. Just to save people some time digging through them, these are the remaining issues that I believe are important for Juno (see above report for details): 1) 10 bundles with missing about.html. Six bundles from emf.query2, four from Gemini. 2) 10 features with no license (in particular their license is the string "%license"). 1 from Virgo, 9 from Gemini. The most common cause of this is missing key in feature.properties file, or the feature.properties file itself is not included in the bin.includes list in the feature's build.properties file. 3) Multiple copies of bundles from eclipse.org projects. These might not be a problem if they are known or understood, but it might mean another project is including old, unreleased versions of another project's bundles. The core.commands dependency seems to be coming from Sapphire, and the remaining dependencies look like they come from RAP. org.eclipse.jetty.xml 8.1.3.v20120522 8.1.3.v20120416 org.eclipse.core.commands 3.6.1.v20120521-2332 3.6.1.v20120521-2329 org.eclipse.rap.jface 1.5.0.20120612-1458 1.5.0.20120605-1606 org.eclipse.jetty.webapp 8.1.3.v20120522 8.1.3.v20120416 org.eclipse.rap.rwt.osgi 1.5.0.20120612-1458
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job?
Hi, I think (hope) problem in ACTF was cleared. But, I noticed that aggregation build was stopped by other problem. Are there any changes in emf/query2? [exec] Mirroring artifacts from file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0 [exec] Build failed! Exception was org.eclipse.equinox.p2.core.ProvisionException: No repository found at file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0 . [exec] No repository found at file:///home/data/httpd/download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/query2/updates/1.0 . Many thanks, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote on 2012/06/14 01:24:46: > From: Kentarou Fukuda/Japan/IBM@IBMJP > To: Cross project issues > Cc: Cross project issues , > cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > Date: 2012/06/14 01:24 > Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson > Juno run.aggregator job? > Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > Hi, > > >the aggregation on build.eclipse.org seems to be doing ok. > > We couldn't fix the problem yet. It seems that ACTF is disabled in current > aggregation build. > > I disabled ACTF aggregation again, and will try it later. > > Best regards, > Kentarou > --- > Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. > IBM Research - Tokyo > Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 > E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com > > > > From: David M Williams > To: Cross project issues > Date: 2012/06/14 01:12 > Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson > Junorun.aggregator job? > Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > > Ok, and ... maybe "you" fixed it already? :) > I made my statement based on my "local" build, which gave (and still > gives) the error below ... but, the aggregation on build.eclipse.org seems > to be doing ok. So ... not sure if what's causing that difference. > > Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not > be found. > Missing requirement: ACTF Visualization Extension for PDT Feature > 1.0.0.R201206130735 (org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group > 1.0.0.R201206130735) requires > 'org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group 0.0.0' but it could not be > found > > InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group) is required > by: > ValidationSet(main) > Contribution(ACTF) > MappedRepository( > http://download.eclipse.org/technology/actf/1.0/update-site/) > Feature(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group > 1.0.0.R201206130735) > > > > > > > > From:Kentarou Fukuda > To:Cross project issues , > Cc:Cross project issues , > cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > Date:06/13/2012 12:08 PM > Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson > Junorun.aggregator job? > Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > > Hi David, > > I'm now working for ACTF... Our new build will be available in several > minutes, but I'm not sure it can be ready for next aggregation build. > > If we can't fix the issue soon, I'll go back to our older build methods. > > Best regards, > Kentarou > --- > Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. > IBM Research - Tokyo > Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 > E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com > > > > From: David M Williams > To: Cross project issues > Date: 2012/06/14 01:02 > Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson > Junorun.aggregator job? > Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org > > > > Next update: > Mylyn's fixed (moved/copied) their repo. > Next problem that showed up was a Jubula ripple effect due to EclipseLink > repo being disabled (ignore that, I went back and disabled EclipseLink > feature only, instead of whole repo so Jubula can "find" what it needs for > > now). > > Next was an ACTF problem. I saw that early ... so, will need to > investigate, but its a leaf component so I think we can temporarily > disable unless we hear something from the team soon ... say in the next 3 > minutes? > > Thanks, > > > > > From:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To:Cross project issues , > Date:06/13/2012 11:57 AM > Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno > > run.aggreg
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job?
Hi, >the aggregation on build.eclipse.org seems to be doing ok. We couldn't fix the problem yet. It seems that ACTF is disabled in current aggregation build. I disabled ACTF aggregation again, and will try it later. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: David M Williams To: Cross project issues Date: 2012/06/14 01:12 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Junorun.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Ok, and ... maybe "you" fixed it already? :) I made my statement based on my "local" build, which gave (and still gives) the error below ... but, the aggregation on build.eclipse.org seems to be doing ok. So ... not sure if what's causing that difference. Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be found. Missing requirement: ACTF Visualization Extension for PDT Feature 1.0.0.R201206130735 (org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group 1.0.0.R201206130735) requires 'org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group 0.0.0' but it could not be found InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.feature.group) is required by: ValidationSet(main) Contribution(ACTF) MappedRepository( http://download.eclipse.org/technology/actf/1.0/update-site/) Feature(org.eclipse.actf.visualization.ui.pdt.feature.group 1.0.0.R201206130735) From:Kentarou Fukuda To:Cross project issues , Cc:Cross project issues , cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Date:06/13/2012 12:08 PM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Junorun.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Hi David, I'm now working for ACTF... Our new build will be available in several minutes, but I'm not sure it can be ready for next aggregation build. If we can't fix the issue soon, I'll go back to our older build methods. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: David M Williams To: Cross project issues Date: 2012/06/14 01:02 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Junorun.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Next update: Mylyn's fixed (moved/copied) their repo. Next problem that showed up was a Jubula ripple effect due to EclipseLink repo being disabled (ignore that, I went back and disabled EclipseLink feature only, instead of whole repo so Jubula can "find" what it needs for now). Next was an ACTF problem. I saw that early ... so, will need to investigate, but its a leaf component so I think we can temporarily disable unless we hear something from the team soon ... say in the next 3 minutes? Thanks, From:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 11:57 AM Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Update ... Eric said to temporarily disable EclipseLink, and he'll try to rebuild to avoid this dependency ... we'll see who shows up next. [FYI, it is helpful, if you get a not about your project failing, to keep us all informed, here on cross-project list. I know many are waiting for a "green build"]. - Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 06/13/2012 11:48 AM - From:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 11:45 AM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job? Nope, just me (just kidding). The current "visible" problem is with EclipseLink but ... just so everyone else knows what we (don't) know ... we've exchanged some notes and something "mysterious" is going on. Current theory is that "mylyn's" whole repo is missing ... waiting to hear from them ... here's the exchange so far ... if anyone has recently removed ejb_3.1.0 from their repo, can you let us know? > > David, > > > > I'm curious why this is happening now. This same build has been > > submitted since last Thursday or Friday, and is only failing today. > > > > After review it looks legitimate and we are investigating what we > > should do about it, but the issue looks like it had been masked, and > > I'm wondering if the masking is permanently removed, or if this > > failure will in essence be temporary. > > > > The problem is that we aren't building our rep
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job?
Hi David, I'm now working for ACTF... Our new build will be available in several minutes, but I'm not sure it can be ready for next aggregation build. If we can't fix the issue soon, I'll go back to our older build methods. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: David M Williams To: Cross project issues Date: 2012/06/14 01:02 Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Junorun.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Next update: Mylyn's fixed (moved/copied) their repo. Next problem that showed up was a Jubula ripple effect due to EclipseLink repo being disabled (ignore that, I went back and disabled EclipseLink feature only, instead of whole repo so Jubula can "find" what it needs for now). Next was an ACTF problem. I saw that early ... so, will need to investigate, but its a leaf component so I think we can temporarily disable unless we hear something from the team soon ... say in the next 3 minutes? Thanks, From:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 11:57 AM Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Fw: Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org Update ... Eric said to temporarily disable EclipseLink, and he'll try to rebuild to avoid this dependency ... we'll see who shows up next. [FYI, it is helpful, if you get a not about your project failing, to keep us all informed, here on cross-project list. I know many are waiting for a "green build"]. - Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 06/13/2012 11:48 AM - From:David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 11:45 AM Subject:Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job? Nope, just me (just kidding). The current "visible" problem is with EclipseLink but ... just so everyone else knows what we (don't) know ... we've exchanged some notes and something "mysterious" is going on. Current theory is that "mylyn's" whole repo is missing ... waiting to hear from them ... here's the exchange so far ... if anyone has recently removed ejb_3.1.0 from their repo, can you let us know? > > David, > > > > I'm curious why this is happening now. This same build has been > > submitted since last Thursday or Friday, and is only failing today. > > > > After review it looks legitimate and we are investigating what we > > should do about it, but the issue looks like it had been masked, and > > I'm wondering if the masking is permanently removed, or if this > > failure will in essence be temporary. > > > > The problem is that we aren't building our repo with the ejb_3.1.0 > > dependency (we don't put it in plugins and the features don't depend > > upon it - but a jar would depend upon the classes. The jar in > > question is a special case though as it would only be used in a > > container where the classes already exist - so actually shipping the > > jar would be superfluous). > > > > -Eric > Eric, > Hmm, not sure ... it could be you (or, aggregator) was "picking it > up" from someone's else repo and they have changed their repo. > > And, I think Mylyn's repo is currently "not present at all". Does > this sound like the kind of think that Mylyn might have in their repo? > David From:Jeff Johnston To:Cross project issues , Date:06/13/2012 11:34 AM Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Failures in the Hudson Juno run.aggregator job? Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org I noticed that the Juno run.aggregator job is failing on Hudson after a bunch of RC4 changes. Is someone assigned to each of the issues (other than David)? -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Juno aggregation build failure and ACTF
Hi Jeff, Excuse me for the issue. I'm now working for the problem, and will fix soon. Best regards, Kentarou --- Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D. IBM Research - Tokyo Tel: +81-3-5144-2852 E-mail: kenta...@jp.ibm.com From: Jeff Johnston To: Cross project issues Date: 2012/05/31 02:55 Subject:[cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Juno aggregation build failure and ACTF Sent by:cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org I updated Linux Tools for RC2, but ran into an issue with ACTF not finding one of its required features. When I disabled this locally, the aggregation validated fine. The last build failed with updates from Linux Tools, ACTF, and Webtools. I updated my local repository so I do not know if the ACTF problem I ran into is the same one causing the build failure. -- Jeff J. ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev ___ cross-project-issues-dev mailing list cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
