FC00 update

1999-12-10 Thread R. A. Hettinga


--- begin forwarded text


Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 23:10:32 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 04:10:29 +0100 (MET)
From: Ray Hirschfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC00 update
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Bcc:

Registration for Financial Cryptography '00 will open next week.  The
early registration deadline has been extended until January 15.

A list of accepted papers is now available on the conference website
(http://fc00.ai).

Anguilla sustained some water damage from Hurricane Lenny, which
should be (mostly) cleaned up by the time of the conference.  The
conference is definitely still on!  A few hotels (including the
Sonesta) are not scheduled to reopen until after the conference.
Further developments will be reported to the fc00 mailing list (but
not to the general fc list).

--- end forwarded text


-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



multi-party untrained unconstrained speech transcription

1999-12-10 Thread Julian Assange


http://speechbot.research.compaq.com/

   The "transcript" that is output by the speech recognition software
   (and shown in small extracts on the Results and Details pages) rarely
   matches what was spoken exactly, and often often does not read very
   well. Because different people speak at different rates and with
   different degrees of clarity, speech recognition software does not
   correctly interpret every word. However, research has shown that
   meaningful words are recognized with a high degree of accuracy, and
   that even when a word is missed, it will most likely be recognized
   when it is spoken somewhere else in the program.



Rethinking Public Key Infrastructures now available @FatBrain

1999-12-10 Thread Jeff Hodges



 Original Message 
Subject: The title you wanted is "In Print"
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 02:35:31 -0800
From: "Fatbrain.com New Title Notifications" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Dear Keep Me Posted subscriber your email address here

 It's here! 

 Rethinking Public Key Infrastructures and Digital Certificates
 by Brands, Stefan is now printed and 
 ready to go. 

 Learn more about it, by clicking on the
 following link (or copying it into your browser):
 http://www.fatbrain.com/shop/info/9090130594?from=NYPKMP

 *
 YOUR PRIVACY
 *
 Receiving e-mail is always your choice.

 We don't sell, rent or loan our customer's 
 names, e-mail addresses or personal information 
 to anyone. We take your trust very seriously, 
 so the only messages you receive will be from us. 
 This includes the automatic order and shipping 
 confirmation e-mail generated upon receipt of 
 your order. 

 *
 CUSTOMER SERVICE
 *
 If you have questions about Keep Me Posted 
 or Fatbrain.com, please contact our 
 friendly, helpful, informative and best of all...
 human Customer Service staff at 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call 
 1-800-789-8590 (domestic) and 
 408-752-9910 (international).


 Sincerely,
 Fatbrain.com {*}



US law makes it a crime to disclose crypto-secrets

1999-12-10 Thread Declan McCullagh

It would be one thing if this law (enacted in 1950) restricted government
employees or contractors from disclosing cryptographic or COMINT info they
agreed to keep secret. But it seems to apply to anyone, including
journalists or cypherpunks, no matter how they obtained the data. That
raises First Amendment issues.

This was discussed during the Church committee hearings in 1975 (p7 of the
transcript) but I don't know if it's come up in court cases.

-Declan


http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/798.html

Sec. 798. Disclosure of classified information 

 (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes,
 transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person,
 or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or
 interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign
 government to the detriment of the United States any classified
 information - 
  (1) concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, 
  cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any 
  foreign government; or 
  (2) concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or 
  repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or
  prepared or 
  planned for use by the United States or any foreign
  government 
  for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes; or 
  (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the 
  United States or any foreign government; or 
  (4) obtained by the process of communication intelligence
  from 
  the communications of any foreign government, knowing the
  same to 
  have been obtained by such processes - 
  Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
  years, or both. 

 (b) As used in subsection (a) of this section - 
 The term ''classified information'' means information which, at the
 time of a violation of this section, is, for reasons of national
security,
 specifically designated by a United States Government Agency for
 limited or restricted dissemination or distribution; 
 The terms ''code,'' ''cipher,'' and ''cryptographic system'' include in
 their meanings, in addition to their usual meanings, any method of
 secret writing and any mechanical or electrical device or method
 used for the purpose of disguising or concealing the contents,
 significance, or meanings of communications; 
 The term ''foreign government'' includes in its meaning any person or
 persons acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of any faction,
 party, department, agency, bureau, or military force of or within a
 foreign country, or for or on behalf of any government or any person
 or persons purporting to act as a government within a foreign
 country, whether or not such government is recognized by the United
 States; 
 The term ''communication intelligence'' means all procedures and
 methods used in the interception of communications and the
 obtaining of information from such communications by other than the
 intended recipients; 
 The term ''unauthorized person'' means any person who, or agency
 which, is not authorized to receive information of the categories set
 forth in subsection (a) of this section, by the President, or by the
 head of a department or agency of the United States Government
 which is expressly designated by the President to engage in
 communication intelligence activities for the United States. 

 (c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the furnishing, upon lawful
 demand, of information to any regularly constituted committee of the
 Senate or House of Representatives of the United States of America,
 or joint committee thereof. 

 (d) 
  (1) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall
  forfeit to the United States irrespective of any provision of
  State law - 
   (A) any property constituting, or derived from, any
   proceeds 
   the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as the result
   of 
   such violation; and 
   (B) any of the person's property used, or intended to
   be used, 
   in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the
   commission 
   of, such violation. 
  (2) The court, in imposing sentence on a defendant for a
  conviction of a violation of this section, shall order that the
  defendant forfeit to the United States all property described in
  paragraph (1). 
  (3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the provisions of
  subsections (b), (c), and (e) through (p) of section 413 of the
  Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of
  

Re: US law makes it a crime to disclose crypto-secrets

1999-12-10 Thread Joe Francis

I beleive Justice Douglas made mention of this law in the Pentagon
Papers case as well, though the US did not bring this up in their case
agaisnt the Times  Post.

Declan McCullagh wrote:
 
 It would be one thing if this law (enacted in 1950) restricted government
 employees or contractors from disclosing cryptographic or COMINT info they
 agreed to keep secret. But it seems to apply to anyone, including
 journalists or cypherpunks, no matter how they obtained the data. That
 raises First Amendment issues.
 
 This was discussed during the Church committee hearings in 1975 (p7 of the
 transcript) but I don't know if it's come up in court cases.
 
 -Declan
 
 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/798.html
 
 Sec. 798. Disclosure of classified information [...]