Re: Changes in Russian licensing of cryptraghical tools
At 12:23 AM 1/20/2008, Alexander Klimov wrote: Given what is required to get a license (for example, 4.b in the first document, says that one must have people trained in information security), I guess the new law is not supposed to limit use of cryptography by ordinary people, but to limit distribution of snake-oil by self-proclaimed professionals. I would have guessed the opposite - it's designed to prevent customized encryption solutions that actually work, but not to prevent mass-market products. Since you don't need a license for totally inadequate crypto, you can still sell snake-oil customized for your users. - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2008: The year of hack the vote?
Well, for all of you who want to prove that hacking the vote is easy, here's your chance to do something: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080121/D8UA8VGG0.html [ ObDebate: is a winner-take-all state more or less attractive to vote hacking? ] --dan - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DRM Helps Sink Another Content Distribution Project
So, what is Apple doing for its brand-new iTunes movie rental thing? 1/3rd of the way into Jobs' song-and-dance http://stream.qtv.apple.com/events/jan/f27853y2/m_972345688g_650_ref.mov --dan - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
