Re: [cryptography] [Cryptography] Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc.

2016-02-14 Thread grarpamp 
On 2/14/16, Henry Baker  wrote:
> Can someone please post a link to the .mp3 or .mp4 of this interview?

youtube-dl https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/246093198
Interview with Cryptome (2016-02-06)-246093198.mp3
sha1: 2cf21291e0190dcc2b6c1fa2587994546311ea0f
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Re: [cryptography] Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc.

2016-02-14 Thread Kevin W. Wall 
(Note: Removed some mailing lists that I am not subscribed to.)

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:38 AM, John Young  wrote:
>
> Cryptome's searing critique of Snowden Inc.
>
> http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354

One thing that I'm not quite getting here that perhaps you can
explain. Ms. Natsios made this comment in the partial interview
transcript posted to http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354:

But these are taxpayer-paid documents belonging in the public
domain. What authority does he have to open the spigot where he
is now controlling in a fairly doctrinaire and authoritarian way
what happens to this trove, this cache?…

I am not disputing the rather dubious handling by Snowden and
others of this all being somewhat self-serving. However, I would question
that these documents (legally speaking) "belong in the public domain"
simply because they were paid for by US taxes and have been
leaked in part. It is a fair question of whether they _should_ be
regarded in this manner, but I am sure that the USG would dispute
that since most of these documents were classified as Secret or
Top Secret and thus never intended for public viewing. It's not
like had we known that these documents existed pre-Snowden disclosure
that we would have had any prayer getting them released via a
FOIA request even if there were prior proof of their existence.
After all, if you believed that, you could make a FOIA request
for the missing pages of the PRISM report and obtain them that
way. Yeah, good luck with that.

-kevin
-- 
Blog: http://off-the-wall-security.blogspot.com/| Twitter: @KevinWWall
NSA: All your crypto bit are belong to us.
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Re: [cryptography] Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc.

2016-02-14 Thread Malcolm Matalka 
John Young  writes:

> Cryptome's searing critique of Snowden Inc.
>
> http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354


"
and why Snowden and The Intercept continue to proselytize for Tor, the
anonymization tool, despite its massive funding from the
U.S. government, the Pentagon and the national security state.
"

Can you go into some detail on this?  I was always under the impression
that the Tor code was open source and heavily audited.  Is the critique
that this is not true or something else?


> https://soundcloud.com/rebootfm/interview-with-cryptome-2016-02-06
>
>
> ___
> cryptography mailing list
> cryptography@randombit.net
> http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

[cryptography] Cryptome’s searing critique of Snowden Inc.

2016-02-14 Thread John Young 

Cryptome's searing critique of Snowden Inc.

http://timshorrock.com/?p=2354
https://soundcloud.com/rebootfm/interview-with-cryptome-2016-02-06


___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography