Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
So then, the Sage in the comic is on the right path? http://tacobell.wikia.com/wiki/7-Layer_Burrito On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Peter Gutmann pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote: Paul Bakker p.j.bak...@offspark.com writes: So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! Oh everyone knows that, if it doesn't have the full seven layers then you're not even trying. Peter. ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
Paul Bakker p.j.bak...@offspark.com writes: So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! Oh everyone knows that, if it doesn't have the full seven layers then you're not even trying. Peter. ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy
-Original Message- From: cryptography [mailto:cryptography-boun...@randombit.net] On Behalf Of coderman Sent: donderdag 26 september 2013 10:07 To: ianG Cc: Crypto discussion list Subject: Re: [cryptography] Opinions on Internet Privacy On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:06 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote: http://xkcd.com/1269/ finally, a succinct response to the Internet debacle! did anyone else immediately associate various friends and/or associates which each archetype? ... i'm craving strawberries. So you agree we DO need an additional layer of symmetric and public key encryption, don't you? Six layers might not be enough!! ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
