Re: Run a remailer, go to jail?

2003-04-01 Thread Michael Shields
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Will FedEx now require an ID before sending packages?

At least in Washington, DC, Fedex already requires an ID before
sending packages.
-- 
Shields.


-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Run a remailer, go to jail?

2003-04-01 Thread Michael Shields
 So there are no FedEx drop boxes in D.C.?? no pickups at hotels etc??

It is not possible to use the drop boxes anonymously, because you must
give an account number or credit card number as payment.
-- 
Shields.


-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: DeCSS, crypto, law, and economics

2003-01-09 Thread Michael Shields
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Exactly. Time segmentation already practiced by the movie studios and
 book publishers, and it's pretty hard to arbitrage -- until somebody
 invents time travel.

For books and CDs -- and as the region coding system breaks down,
increasingly for DVDs as well -- only shipping costs and market
illiquidity protect the segmentation.  And markets are becoming more
liquid, even at the consumer level.  For example, I routinely order
the European editions of books from amazon.co.uk, for example, instead
of waiting for them to be published in the US.  This is exactly as
easy as buying from amazon.com; they even accept the same login.
-- 
Shields.


-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: limits of watermarking (Re: First Steganographic Image in the Wild)

2001-10-17 Thread Michael Shields

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 b) Even if physical media goes away, individual watermarking blows away
 multicast - and broadband will just never work without that.

It is true that broadband isn't viable if it requires a high-bandwidth
from one source to every end user; the stream has to be exploded at
some replication points near the viewers.  But that replication
doesn't have to be done by the routers; it can also happen at a
distributed network of servers, which can be intelligent enough to add
watermarking at a cost on the same order of the cost to provide SSL.
This sort of server-based multicasting is widely deployed today by
Akamai and others, and has been far more successful than router-based
multicasting.
-- 
Shields.



-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Which internet services were used?

2001-09-18 Thread Michael Shields

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 These same people ignore the fact that the US economy, and indeed the
 world economy, could no longer function without encryption.

I am not sure that it is accurate to say that the world economy will
grind to a halt without encryption.  It would suffer massive truly
fraud losses, just as credit cards currently experience massive fraud
due to their use of a single fixed account number.  But given the
current mood in the US, the public might even be prepared to accept
huge economic losses -- if it made them feel safer.

An effective argument against crypto restrictions must be on the
grounds that new laws would not help fight terrorism.  It is very
difficult to convince people with a cost-side argument, because the
effects of a successful terrorist attack can be viewed as nearly
infinite.  The public will only be strongly opposed to new measures if
they feel that they are ineffective.
-- 
Shields.



-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]