Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.

2002-06-22 Thread Steve Fulton

At 18:57 21/06/2002 -0700, John Young wrote:

Data retention is being done now by programs and services
which cache data to ease loading on servers and networks.
[...]

John,

As a systems administrator @ an ISP, I can tell flat out that the software 
you describe has nothing to do with ISP services.  The software provides 
caching services for telecom companies (ie. billing, WAP, voice mail alerts 
etc).  I see nothing that mentions typical ISP services, like e-mail or 
web-browsing.  It is software designed to impress the executive level with 
pie charts and promises of reduced hardware costs.  No one likes spending 
$50k on a NAS or Fibre Channel / RAID 10 box.

Next time John, I suggest you turn your sites on caching software like 
Squid.  Know what?  I'm not even afraid to provide the URL! 
http://www.squid-cache.org ..  you may even discover it has US Intelligence 
Community(tm) links, dating back many years!  Incredible, huh?  ISP's like 
the one I work for use Squid to save on bandwidth costs by caching 
oft-visited websites.  Unfortunately, we (like most if not all ISP's) 
cannot afford the massive disk arrays (or the space they would take up, 
even the electricity) that would be necessary to retain data *for one 
day*.  Geez, I don't think the government gonna like that.

That's doesn't even bring us to the technical abilities of all the 
different pieces of software that must be re-written (en masse) to satisfy 
government desires.  For instance, let's try e-mail software.. There are 
numerous companies and individuals who offer their own versions of e-mail 
server software.  Microsoft's Exchange and Ipswitch's IMail for the Windows 
crowd who like spending lots of money, or Qmail, Postfix, Exim and even 
Sendmail for the Unix crowd.  There are dozen's more, but you get the 
point.  All that software will need to be rewritten.  Then all the e-mail 
servers will need to be upgraded and tested.  THEN more disk space  added 
just to handle all the extraneous information like from who and to, from 
where (say originating IP and from what server host and IP) etc etc etc ad 
nauseam.   Whoops!  Let's not forget tape backups!  I'm buying 3M stock 
come Monday!  But what happens if we have a disk failure and the logs are 
lost?  Hmm...

Anyway, that is just for e-mail.. Imagine what HTTP, or FTP, or whatever 
can't-live-without service someone invents in the future?  Data retention 
is unworkable even to the biggest of companies.  Even the NSA cannot store 
that kind of data without a significant (and secret) budget.  The only ones 
deriving any benefit from this are law enforcement and computer hardware  
commercial software manufacturers.  Maybe its an economic stimulus package 
in disguise?

-- Steve.







-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.

2002-06-22 Thread Steve Fulton

At 17:37 22/06/2002 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Not arguing, but the hardware cost curve for storage has a shorter
halving time than the cost curve for CPU (Moore's Law) and the
corresponding halving time for bandwidth is shorter still.

You've got a point.  Storage is becoming less and less expensive per 
gigabyte, especially for IDE drives.  If you're using a RAID set up, IDE 
doesn't cut it, SCSI is the way to go (for now).  SCSI is a lot cheaper 
than it used to be, but it's still over $1000 for a single 70gig drive in 
Canada.  For maximum redundancy in one rack-mount server, RAID 10 is the 
way to go.  That means for every 1 drive, there must be an an exact 
duplicate.  Costs can increase exponentially.

That said, storage isn't the only expense when creating a large, fast and 
redundant file server (especially for caching).  The fastest way to get 
data from a computer to the file server is via fibre channel.  And fibre 
channel hardware isn't cheap.  Last time I looked, a DIY RAID 10 system 
with 15 drives (1 hot-standby), case and fibre channel capability was ~ 
$30-35k.  For each workstation that connects to it, there is a ~1k charge 
for the fibre channel client card.  Don't even go near a fibre channel 
switch, they run $10-15k apiece, and don't handle more than 10-15 
connections.  Plus cabling.

See, it adds up -- and that's just for one unit.  To do the kind of data 
retention proposed in th EU, that is the kind of hardware that would be 
necessary.  Plus a rack of tape backup drives running 24x7.  Perhaps this 
sounds extreme, and it very well could be.  My concern isn't so much based 
on what the law says must be retained, the penalties if the data isn't 
retained are what worry me.

Could a system or network administrator be charged if the data is 
unavailable?  What if their is a plausible reason (ie. hardware failed a 
year ago, fire)?  What if the company cannot afford it?  What charges are 
brought against the company?  These questions are the reality for sysadmins 
in the EU.  If Canada implemented a data retention law, I would be 
extremely concerned about my personal liability as well as corporate -- 
Canada already can charge a network administrator who the police believe is 
negligent in blocking (and removing) copyrighted software from computers 
he/she is responsible.  It has happened.  My understanding it has to do 
with an RCMP settlement over the PROMIS software scandal, but that's 
another topic.

-- Steve


-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]