[css-d] css attachment problem
Please look at this site http://www.cheekyjumpingcastles.com.au/ It was working fine (and validating) until I made a small adjustment this morning - now the css doesn't show up. I have just updated to Dream weaver 8.2 and am using a template to update all pages. Any ideas most welcome! __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] CSS positioning
I have managed to fix the problem that was the subject of my earlier question re css style sheet not showing up - it was a problem with the Dreamweaver template - the link was within an editable region in the header. However I now have a positioning problem seen in both Firefox and IE&, which occurred after I had been tweaking the left hand column! I suspect it has a mathematical basis, but can't quite get my head around it today. Any ideas? __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Unable to scroll down page in IE?
Jon Hughes wrote:
> http://www.santinipackers.com/phazm/
> Afer adding in faux columns, I can no longer scroll down my pages in
> IE.
>
> Anyone know a fix for this?
Pardon me for mentioning it, but you're repeating your question from
only a few days ago, and seems to ignore the answers.
How do you expect IE6 to be able to scroll, when you're telling it to
*hide* everything outside body..?
Get rid of this...
* html body {overflow: hidden;}
...and _never_ use that kind of "construction" again.
Another - *very important* - point:
HTML comments, like in the following from your page...
...should *not* be used for wrapping styles.
The CSS validator warns against them...
" Do not put style rules inside HTML comments as they may be removed
by user agent "
...and the fact is that the CSS validator can not find any styles in
your page, because you have commented them out. That may be seen as an
efficient way to achieve perfect validaton-results, but it sure isn't a
good one.
In practice:
Web pages that claim to be XHTML and which are served as 'text/html', do
not need any additional "hiding styles" methods. The element
hides its content from view by default, and it is no longer read as part
of the (X)HTML source-code.
This will do...