[css-d] Alert box with CSS
Hi, this is from 2007: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/alert-box-with-css.html I think that's a good test on CSS system colors (which, unfortunately, have been deprecated in CSS3). HTH bye :-) Gabriele Romanato http://www.css-zibaldone.com http://www.css-zibaldone.com/test/ (English) http://www.css-zibaldone.com/articles/ (English) http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/ (English) __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Behind the CSS Scenery of My New Nested List
Hello, To those of you experienced in nested lists, I have a question. Let's take this as a nested list example: Item1 Item2 Subitem1 Subitem2 Subitem3 Item3 If you built this nested list, would your site architecture that supports it look like 1 or 2, for subitem1: 1. wwwdotdomain.com/subitem1.html 2. wwwdotdomain.com/item2/subitem1.html I'm trying to figure out if my site should remain as it is, in this form: http://www.draftingservices.com/autocad_tutorial_1_basic_training_video_seri es.html Or if I should stick my autocad_tutorial_1_basic_training_video_series.html page into a folder titled autocad_tutorials, like this: www . draftingservices.com/autocad_tutorials/autocad_tutorial_1_basic_training_vid eo_series.html ??? Sincerely, Brian M. Curran | CAD Consultant __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Behind the CSS Scenery of My New Nested List
Brian M. Curran wrote: 1. wwwdotdomain.com/subitem1.html 2. wwwdotdomain.com/item2/subitem1.html 2., because subitem1.html could exist under multiple parents. Philip Taylor __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Behind the CSS Scenery of My New Nested List
--- On Wed, 10/6/10, Brian M. Curran br...@draftingservices.com wrote: If you built this nested list, would your site architecture that supports it look like 1 or 2, for subitem1: 1. wwwdotdomain.com/subitem1.html 2. wwwdotdomain.com/item2/subitem1.html If this really is a question about URL architecture (and not a question about CSS that I'm misunderstanding), it's way off-topic for this list. I notice that you've cross-posted to the webdesign-L list; that's a MUCH more relevant place for the question. - Bobby __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Behind the CSS Scenery of My New Nested List
Brian M. Curran wrote: 1. wwwdotdomain.com/subitem1.html 2. wwwdotdomain.com/item2/subitem1.html Philip Taylor wrote: 2., because subitem1.html could exist under multiple parents. Thanks!! -Brian __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] :: ie/7.0 ::
Why does this page [1] crash IE/7.0 ? [1] http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/journal/index.php Best, ~grasshopper -- :: desktop and mobile :: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] Disable (and hide) vertical scrollbar
Hi all!
I am searching a CSS way to disable a vertical scrollbar on a page.
I succeeded with IE with the following CSS code :
body {
overflow-y: hidden;
overflow: auto;
}
Do you know how to disable vertical scrolling in FF, Chrome and Safari ?
Thanks in advance,
--
Donald FRUY
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] :: ie/7.0 ::
On 10/6/10 7:30 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, David Laakso wrote: Why does this page [1] crash IE/7.0 ? [1] http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/journal/index.php Perhaps it doesn't like the errors on the page? Wouldn't that be ironic! Correction of the machine errors does not resolve the problem. Or do they? Best, ~grasshopper -- :: desktop and mobile :: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] :: ie/7.0 ::
David Laakso wrote: On 10/6/10 7:30 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, David Laakso wrote: Why does this page [1] crash IE/7.0 ? [1] http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/journal/index.php Perhaps it doesn't like the errors on the page? Wouldn't that be ironic! Correction of the machine errors does not resolve the problem. Or do they? Best, ~grasshopper Hello Grasshopper, Remove that JS within those IE conditional comments and use this valid code. object height=304 width=380 data=http://www.youtube.com/v/kj68rMveW6wamp;hl=enamp;fs=1; type=application/x-shockwave-flash param name=movie value=http://www.youtube.com/v/kj68rMveW6wamp;hl=enamp;fs=1; / param name=allowFullScreen value=true / /object And see if IE7 is any happier. -- Alan http://css-class.com/ Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] :: ie/7.0 ::
On 10/6/10 9:53 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: Why does this page [1] crash IE/7.0 ? [1] http://chelseacreekstudio.com/site/journal/index.php Hello Grasshopper, Remove that JS within those IE conditional comments and use this valid code. object height=304 width=380 data=http://www.youtube.com/v/kj68rMveW6wamp;hl=enamp;fs=1; type=application/x-shockwave-flash param name=movie value=http://www.youtube.com/v/kj68rMveW6wamp;hl=enamp;fs=1; / param name=allowFullScreen value=true / /object And see if IE7 is any happier. Oh, yuk o'rama. That may, indeed, make IE/7.0 happy. However, I am not so sure that it will make me happy :-) . Thanks. Best, ~grasshopper -- :: desktop and mobile :: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Disable (and hide) vertical scrollbar
On Oct 7, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Donald Fruy wrote:
I am searching a CSS way to disable a vertical scrollbar on a page.
I succeeded with IE with the following CSS code :
body {
overflow-y: hidden;
overflow: auto;
}
Do you know how to disable vertical scrolling in FF, Chrome and Safari ?
Perhaps by taking the cascade into account ? In your code as above, the
'overflow' property actually overrides the 'overflow-y' property.
body {
overflow: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
}
works as expected in Gecko and WebKit based browsers. You can even drop the
'overflow:auto', as this is the default behaviour, unless you already applied
to overflow property to the root element.
(another question is whether this is a good idea to do... accessibility wise)
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS3 transformations: rotate
On Oct 6, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/10/css3-transformations-rotate.html Opera seems not to support it. -o-transform: rotate() works just fine here (as one would expect for something that is in a spec in early stages of development). Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] [OT] :: ie/7.0 ::
On Thursday 07 October 2010 12:12, David Laakso wrote: Why does this page [1] crash IE/7.0 ? I'm wondering - does anyone else drop all posts/threads from repeat OT posters? I'm considering it here. I have seen some repeatedly being told this is not the appropriate forum for their questions but still offending. -- Michael __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
