[css-d] website on ipad

2012-06-22 Thread ochieng' nelson
My website users complain that the website (http://kerdowneysafaris.com/)
does not work well when they view it using ipad. This is especially so
about on the menu items which they say jump around. Any help in solving
these problem? Thanks.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] website on ipad

2012-06-22 Thread David Postill
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:34:37 +0300, ochieng' nelson wrote:

| My website users complain that the website (http://kerdowneysafaris.com/)
| does not work well when they view it using ipad. This is especially so
| about on the menu items which they say jump around. Any help in solving
| these problem? Thanks.

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Fkerdowneysafaris.com%2F
14 errors

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21warning=0uri=http%3A%2F%2Fkerdowneysafaris.com%2F
23 errors

Perhaps if you fixed these ...

By the way, your menu items jump around on Firefox 13 as well.
-- 
David Postill
Dance your Life - Biodanza in Alkmaar and Castricum, Holland - 
http://www.danceyourlife.eu
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Wrapper DIV vs. BODY

2012-06-22 Thread Kyle Sessions
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm taking the body element as the viewport area and the wrapper as the
 content container area


That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background image.
So body gets the background image and div#wrapper gets the width and
margins.

~K~

-- 
Kyle G Sessions
Berkeley Electronic Press
ksessi...@bepress.com

510-665-1200 + 128

www.bepress.com

bepress: the frontier of scholarly publishing since 1999

Check out IR success stories on the DC Telegraph at
http://blog.digitalcommons.bepress.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Wrapper DIV vs. BODY

2012-06-22 Thread Tim Arnold
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Kyle Sessions ksessi...@bepress.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm taking the body element as the viewport area and the wrapper as the
 content container area


 That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
 explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background image.
 So body gets the background image and div#wrapper gets the width and
 margins.


You could use the body tag as your explicit width wrapper, and put
the repeating background on your html tag as well!  I always forget
this.

Tim

-- 

tim.arn...@gmail.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Wrapper DIV vs. BODY

2012-06-22 Thread David Hucklesby

On 6/22/12 10:30 AM, Kyle Sessions wrote:

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:47 AM, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote:


I'm taking the body element as the viewport area and the wrapper as the
content container area



That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background image.
So body gets the background image and div#wrapper gets the width and
margins.



Why not add the background to the HTML element and put width and margins on
the BODY element? Works for me.
--
Cordially,
David



__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Wrapper DIV vs. BODY

2012-06-22 Thread Kyle Sessions

  I'm taking the body element as the viewport area and the wrapper as
 the
  content container area
 
 
  That's how I usually interpret it. I might want my content to have an
  explicit width, but I'd like an unlimited-width repeating background
 image.
  So body gets the background image and div#wrapper gets the width and
  margins.
 

 You could use the body tag as your explicit width wrapper, and put
 the repeating background on your html tag as well!  I always forget
 this.

 Tim

 --

 tim.arn...@gmail.com


Hmm, I hadn't thought about that, but it seems like it could work ... I
have generally avoided styling html at all. Not sure there's any reason
to avoid it; maybe I'm just superstitious. ;)

-- 
Kyle G Sessions
Berkeley Electronic Press
ksessi...@bepress.com

510-665-1200 + 128

www.bepress.com

bepress: the frontier of scholarly publishing since 1999

Check out IR success stories on the DC Telegraph at
http://blog.digitalcommons.bepress.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] css3 animations

2012-06-22 Thread Sandy


hey all,

I have been working on figuring out css3 animations and have come up 
with a couple of test pages.



http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html

http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator
turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to
@-moz-keyframes and -moz-animation
is there a way to get the animations and have the css validate? Should I 
be rewriting this?


Other things that don't work the way I would like:

I added
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
to 7 and 9 to keep the animated effects on the box borders from bulging 
out the boxes.


When I mouseover it *almost* works, but there is a shift in the width 
just towards the end of the animation - just a brief bulge. I can't 
figure out where that's coming from or how to get rid of it.


Another especially weird thing - locally all the boxes are one size, 
when I upload the page to the server, without changing anything, they 
are a bit narrower. Any idea of what's going on?


On 18 there is a little extra white border on the top of the box - looks 
like one more pixel. I have no idea where that's coming from. Any thoughts?


Also, in 23 - the image expands on mouseover, which is hunky dory, but 
it also degrades. What I would like is to have the 300px image shrink 
down to 150px and then show its full-sized self on mouseover. This would 
take a different approach but I can't think what it might be.



http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/tires.html
a possible candidate for Inappropriate uses of CSS3

here's the question - is there a way of timing the effects - so 
animation 2 starts a 2 second delay after animation 1?


thanks!

Sandy

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Can H tags be varied?

2012-06-22 Thread John
I hope I'm (A) using the right term and (B) not asking something really dumb..

I'm in a situation where I could use a variation of my h1 tag, but I don't know 
whether that's a legal move, or even the right way to do it.

Assuming it's legal, I've tried h1.two (as opposed to just h1) to get my 
variant, but this doesn't seem to work.

I know that it can be done with classes, as in: p.first, p.body, etc.

Am I barking up the wrong tree? Should I bark up a vine instead? Is that vine a 
poisonous snake?

thank you!

John
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can H tags be varied?

2012-06-22 Thread William Gaffga
Using classes is correct and h1.two is perfectly legal. If it is not
working that's because of some coding error on your end.
put this in your css:
h1.two {font-size: 3em; color: #ff6600;text-decoration:overline;}

put this in your code:
h1 class=twoThis is a big orange heading with a line at the top/h1

--
William Gaffga
www.wilyguy.net/portfolio/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/willgaffga
H: 805-492-0192
M: 805-405-6602
S: willgaffga


On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:06 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:

 I hope I'm (A) using the right term and (B) not asking something really
 dumb..

 I'm in a situation where I could use a variation of my h1 tag, but I don't
 know whether that's a legal move, or even the right way to do it.

 Assuming it's legal, I've tried h1.two (as opposed to just h1) to get my
 variant, but this doesn't seem to work.

 I know that it can be done with classes, as in: p.first, p.body, etc.

 Am I barking up the wrong tree? Should I bark up a vine instead? Is that
 vine a poisonous snake?

 thank you!

 John
 __
 css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can H tags be varied?

2012-06-22 Thread John
Thank you, William...I see what I was doing wrong, and thank you for the 
confirmation.

John


On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:56 PM, William Gaffga wrote:

 Using classes is correct and h1.two is perfectly legal. If it is not working 
 that's because of some coding error on your end. 
 put this in your css:
 h1.two {font-size: 3em; color: #ff6600;text-decoration:overline;}
 
 put this in your code:
 h1 class=twoThis is a big orange heading with a line at the top/h1
 
 --
 William Gaffga
 www.wilyguy.net/portfolio/
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/willgaffga
 H: 805-492-0192
 M: 805-405-6602
 S: willgaffga
 
 
 On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:06 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
 I hope I'm (A) using the right term and (B) not asking something really dumb..
 
 I'm in a situation where I could use a variation of my h1 tag, but I don't 
 know whether that's a legal move, or even the right way to do it.
 
 Assuming it's legal, I've tried h1.two (as opposed to just h1) to get my 
 variant, but this doesn't seem to work.
 
 I know that it can be done with classes, as in: p.first, p.body, etc.
 
 Am I barking up the wrong tree? Should I bark up a vine instead? Is that vine 
 a poisonous snake?
 
 thank you!
 
 John
 __
 css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
 

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Can H tags be varied?

2012-06-22 Thread John
Thank you, Teresa! That's an example of just what I'm trying to do.


J



On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote:

 http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_standard_class.asp
 
 This should help you.
 
 
 Logo_RGB_email.jpg
 Theresa Jennings
 Graphic Design  Production • Web Design  Development • Illustration • 
 Portraiture • Hand Quilting
 tjenni...@mindsqueezecreative.com
 909.799.7405 • Fax 888.676.7640 
 mindsqueezecreative.com
 
 
 
 
 On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:06 PM, John wrote:
 
 I hope I'm (A) using the right term and (B) not asking something really 
 dumb..
 
 I'm in a situation where I could use a variation of my h1 tag, but I don't 
 know whether that's a legal move, or even the right way to do it.
 
 Assuming it's legal, I've tried h1.two (as opposed to just h1) to get my 
 variant, but this doesn't seem to work.
 
 I know that it can be done with classes, as in: p.first, p.body, etc.
 
 Am I barking up the wrong tree? Should I bark up a vine instead? Is that 
 vine a poisonous snake?
 
 thank you!
 
 John
 __
 css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
 http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
 List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
 Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
 

__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] css3 animations

2012-06-22 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh

Le 23 juin 2012 à 04:45, Sandy a écrit :

 
 http://sandyfeldman.com/tests/animation/css3animation.html
 
 http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator
 turns up 80 errors on the css, all connected to
 @-moz-keyframes and -moz-animation
 is there a way to get the animations and have the css validate? Should I be 
 rewriting this?

Under 'options', you can turn vendor prefixed stuff to 'warning'.
Dunno about the rest of your post as you've coded your page to be Gecko only, 
and I don't have Firefox on this machine.

You do know that WebKit browsers, Opera and IE10 also support animations with 
the appropriate prefixes, I hope…

Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/






__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/