Re: [css-d] make link non-clickable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason is that's what the client wants I follow standards fairly well in my own little way - but the client and the cms are my nemeses there are ways to prevent links from _looking_ like links, thereby making it less probable that users click on them, This is proabbly the best to do in my situation thanks Neal How about making something that is not a link look like a link? unot a link/u Frank __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Gentle site check please
Cynthia M. Brumbaugh wrote:
Ok, so I am finally getting off the porch and testing my running shoes.
Please be gentle but honest.
http://www.chekmed.com/med_index.htm
This page does validate both html and css.
Cynthia
You have padding on the a:hover, but not a{
This causes the links to indent when hovered. Is this intentional?
Frank
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Are table-based layouts still needed
E Michael Brandt wrote: ... I wonder if someone has a good CSS solution for this table: Two columns, the first is of images, one per row, but of varying heights, the second is of descriptive text of varying - but multiline - amounts which I wish to center vertically to the right of its image. . http://sethshulman.com/seth_shulman_books/ ... Is there a good solution that works cross browser *without resorting to semantically meaningless nested divs* ? .. E. Michael Brandt Michael This seems like a perfectly appropriate use of a table to me. You could achieve a similar effect with an unordered list and floating images, but I don't think it would be very more machine reader friendly, and it would be much harder to get the alignment between the images and the text the way you have it.. You are not using tables to structure the page, only what can be reasonably considered tabular data on the page. Frank Piuck __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] positioning guidance
JGardner wrote: I want three boxes lined up next to each other (the light blue boxes). I tried floating them but somehow that made them go into the footer (which has a red border on it while I am trying to figure this all out). So then I absolutely positioned them inside a relatively positioned div. Now the footer is up behind the boxes. Jennifer Do you have a clear statement on the footer? (e.g. clear:all) Frank __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] Absolute Floated Layout
Elli Vizcaino wrote: Hi List, Is there a way to combine floated divs with absolute positioned divs for layout, without having the page behave erratically across several browsers? The page in question is: http://template.dev.advance.net/impact/index.ssf The company I work for would like the content area (FEATURED STORY/ALL STORIES FROM [DATE]:) column to appear at the top of the HTML document, right after the body tag for SEO purposes. While still retaining the look of the current layout. What you should also know about this proposed request is that numerous hands have messed with the code. The CSS sheets being called are a mess and this is the first time I am dealing with it. They expect me to clean up the mess and give them what they want. The other thing is that it is only coded to transitional standards which doesn't validate as is. And they use a proprietary platform called .ssf that behaves like a combination of frames and server side includes. The browsers we support are IE 6 7 and FF on PC and FF Safari on Mac. Basically, I've already told them I didn't think it was a good idea given the time frame and because I'm thinking floats and absolute might not mix well. And because the code is a mess, that it would be better to start from scratch (something which really can't be done at this point given the deadline). So what I wanted to know from you guys is, is there any way to give them what they want and salvage this mess of a mess in a short amount of time? Or is this just really hopeless? All feedback welcomed. TIA, Elli Elli It would help if we could see the page. I got a request for login and password . Do you think you could copy the html to a publicly accessible space? Frank Piuck __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] footer that 'sticks' at the bottom
Arian Hojat wrote: Now that you mention fixed positioning, i think you are right Frank, thats probably what i want... but i remember IE doesn't support this right? Anyway to get cross browser compatible? Arian Now that you mention it, the time I tried this, it worked for me in Firefox and not in IE. Sorry. Frank __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
