Re: [css-d] Fluid iFrame Height? Argh!

2007-11-13 Thread Jon Stockdill
On Nov 13, 2007 11:58 AM, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've got a site that needs to make extensive use of material being
 served from an outside source (server external to main site server), and
 about the only way I can seem to keep my formatting to be constant
 across the entire site is to pull the external material into an iFrame.

 It there *any* way to make the iFrame height fluid. I need the iFrame to
 expand according to the material being pulled in so there's only the
 browser scrollbars, no iFrame scrollbar.

 I've been goofing with this for several days now, and nothing that's
 turned up on any searches I've done has worked so far, and I'm slowly
 starting to run out of hair...

 A page on the site using an iFrame would be structured like:

 a. header - from server A
 b. intro - from server A
 c. external material - from server B
 (this may contain links going to other pages that needs to
 stay inside this iFrame - but adjust in height according
 to content.)
 d. footer - from server A


 Any Ideas?
 Any Better Ideas?


Could you move the call from the client to server A and cache it?

--jon
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] :: Opera/9.23 Mac ::

2007-09-16 Thread Jon Stockdill
On 9/15/07, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 David Laakso wrote:
 
  I have a little rendering mystery. Opera/9.23 Mac is not behave quite
  the same as Opera/9.23 Win on this page:
 
  uri
  http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/sm-chg/
  (I would suggest disabling images unless you plan to take in a movie
  while you wait for them to load)
 
  css
  http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/sm-chg/css/style.css
 
  For example, the ul numeral b01/b should be red. And it is red in
  both OS at 100%.
  But Opera/Mac /does not retain the red color/ at 90% and below, or at
  110% and up.
 
  On this test page with the ul isolated there is no problem whatsoever
  in Opera/Mac-- the color of the numeral 01 is red regardless of the
  percent of font-zoom.
  http://www.chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/cssd/test-opera.html
 
  Where have I gone wrong?
 
  Thank you.
 
  ~dL
 


 Thank you for the replies both on and off-list. The good news is I seem
 to be the only one in the world for whom the issue(s) persists.

 Best,

 ~dL

It renders nicely at 90%,100% and 110% in 9.5 for the mac:

Version
9.50 Alpha
Build
4404
Platform
MacOS X
System
10.4.10

--jon
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] What is a simple alternative to JS+CSS rounded corners

2006-12-28 Thread Jon Stockdill
Doesn't use images or JS:
http://www.spiffycorners.com/sc.php?sc=spiffybg=fffg=0a67e6

Uses images, but no JS:
http://www.albin.net/CSS/roundedCorners/examples.html

Please let me know if these work out for you.  I considered them, but
eventually choose Nifty.

--jon




On 12/27/06, Parag Jagdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you for your replies.

 Yes, i was talking about NiftyCorners with sytanx that i briefly saw
 looked like this:
 Rounded(div.box_3_1_T,top,transparent,#8BBDF7);
 Rounded(div.box_3_1_T,bottom,transparent,#CFE2F8);
 Rounded(div.box_3_2_T,top,transparent,#4799E6);
 Rounded(div.box_3_2_T,bottom,transparent,#B6D7F7);
 Rounded(div.box_3_3_T,top,transparent,#306799);
 Rounded(div.box_3_3_T,bottom,transparent,#7EB2E1);

 I want to avoid that.

 The following is what I have implemented with my method:
 http://test.un-identified.com/misc_images/roundedCorners.html

 I want to come up with something like that, but i dont believe a JS
 solution will give me such shadowed borders...point me in the right
 direction if there is such a method which uses images!

 See how I have freedom with images and shadows in phtosohop, and I am
 limited only by the fact that the width must be fixed?

 On 12/27/06, Stephan Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On 12/27/06, Parag Jagdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   So the company I am working for suggests the use of one of the
   Javascript+CSS rounded corners solutions. But I myself do not believe
   in using Javascript for pure presentation, and I believe that
   sacrificing the bandwidth to load all this JS is not worth the
   benefit.
  
   On the other hand, the solution I currently have is also a little
   complex and heavy. It uses 3 images and 3 DIV layers. The header and
   footer images in total probably take more bandwidth than the JS in the
   other solution. The benefit I see in this solution is that there is no
   3rd party (no JS to worry about). There are only DIV layers and CSS
   classes that are already defined, so no JS is involved in
   presentation.
   Another benefit is that I can give the boxes any type of shadowing and
   patterns in Photoshop to make the style of the boxes match the rest of
   the site.
  
   What do you think?
  
   div class=portalBox
   div class=portalBox_headSearch Colleges/div
  
  
   /div
   div class=portalBox_foot/div
  
   portalBox: is a vertically repeating image
  
   portalBox_head: a fixed width and height rectangle which has a non
   repeating image with the top left  and right corners rounded
  
   portalBox_foot: a fixed width and height rectangle which has a non
   repeating image with the bottom left and right corners rounded
  
   div.portalBox{
   float:left;
   width: 524px;
   text-align:left;
   background-image: url(../images/portals/portalBox_blue_re.jpg);
   background-repeat: repeat-y;
   }
   div.portalBox_head{
   width: 524px;
   height: 25px;
   float:left;
   background-image: url(../images/portals/portalBox_blue_head.jpg);
   background-repeat: no-repeat;
   text-align:left;
   font-size:14px;
   font-weight: bold;
   color: #333;
   padding: 0.6em 1em;
   margin:0;
  
  
   }
   div.portalBox_foot{
   float:left;
   width: 524px;
   height: 12px;
   background-image: url(../images/portals/portalBox_blue_foot.jpg);
   background-repeat: no-repeat;
   }
  
  
   What I want to know is am i just being stubborn about not using an
   easier solution(The JS), or am I right saying that the solution is too
   complex and no JS should be involved?
  
   If there is a better no JS solution, im all ears!
  
   Thank You,
   Parag Jagdale
   __
   css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
   IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
   List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
   Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
  
 
  When I came across this problem I thought, just look at what the
  javascript does, and use that directly: it manipulates the DOM and
  inserts spans and divs, as far as I remember. These have classes which
  produce the appearance of rounded corners.
 
  I don't know how this would compare to what you have assembled.
 
  In general, I don't think it is wise to let the page appear
  differently when javascript is turned off.
 
  If you are generating the page with PHP, or Rails, or Java, etc. a
  helper method could do the rounding on the server side, instead of
  the browser.
 
 
  Stephan
 
 
 
  --
  Stephan Wehner
   http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
   http://stephansmap.org
   http://www.trafficlife.com
   http://www.buckmaster.ca
  __
  css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]