Re: [css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-24 Thread Manfred Staudinger
Hi all,

I suppose my question was too general to get useful answers. This time
its more concrete, you can try it:

http://documenta.rudolphina.org/cond-css-demo.xml

Any questions?

Manfred
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-19 Thread Manfred Staudinger
On 19/04/2008, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Manfred Staudinger wrote:

  ***off-list***

  You got a uri?  Or just a mouth?

David,

  You got a uri?
I have not yet decided to publish it. To clarify the pros and cons I started
this thread.

  Or just a mouth?
I don't understand what you mean, please clarify.

Manfred
Manfred
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-19 Thread David Hucklesby
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:32:25 +0200, Manfred Staudinger wrote:
[...]

 ...if we had a method to target
 the most advanced browsers, we would be able to _add_ something new to the
 (technically) minimalistic approach dictated by MS. Web sites would then look
 differently in different browsers while functionally still equivalent (a 
 must, I
 suppose).


Great idea. We do too have a method. To add to the wise words already
offered, I suggest using attribute selectors to give 'advanced' styling
to modern browsers.

It has been done, of course:

http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/css_a_tribute_to_selectors.html

Cordially,
David
--

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-18 Thread Manfred Staudinger
Hi list,

Currently I'm thinking about a consistent and simple method for CSS to
target not only IE's but also Mozilla, Safari and Opera, each of them
separately and standards compliant.

Up to now the CSS language actually available for developing web sites
is limited by the weakest browser to be supported (IE 6, IE 7). Many
great techniques have been generated and documented by web developers
to overcome bugs and shortcomings.

These constrains will not go away for years to come. But if we had a
method to target the most advanced browsers, we would be able to _add_
something new to the (technically) minimalistic approach dictated by
MS. Web sites would then look differently in different browsers while
functionally still equivalent (a must, I suppose).

What are your pros and cons?

Regards,

Manfred
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-18 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Manfred Staudinger wrote:

 What are your pros and cons?

pros: none, or some very limited and short-sighted ones.

con: anyone can disregard any browser - by choice or by lack of
knowledge or interest.

result: total anarchy - as if it wasn't bad enough out here already.

Browsers should only be separated by their qualities and capacities, not
by name or version. We already do that - it's known as progressive
enhancement and drives browser-developers to constantly improve their
products. That's what we want.

All other attempts on separating browsers will be and/or already are
counteracted by browser-vendors, as separation/targeting/versioning tend
to break browsers instead of letting them do their job in an optimal way
and keep on improving and competing on the (somewhat) leveled
playing-field of standard compliance.

regards
Georg
-- 
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Beyond CC's, targeting Mozilla, Safari and Opera

2008-04-18 Thread Zoe M. Gillenwater
Manfred Staudinger wrote:
 Hi list,

 Currently I'm thinking about a consistent and simple method for CSS to
 target not only IE's but also Mozilla, Safari and Opera, each of them
 separately and standards compliant.

 Up to now the CSS language actually available for developing web sites
 is limited by the weakest browser to be supported (IE 6, IE 7). Many
 great techniques have been generated and documented by web developers
 to overcome bugs and shortcomings.

 These constrains will not go away for years to come. But if we had a
 method to target the most advanced browsers, we would be able to _add_
 something new to the (technically) minimalistic approach dictated by
 MS. Web sites would then look differently in different browsers while
 functionally still equivalent (a must, I suppose).

 What are your pros and cons?
   

Hi Manfred,

As others have already said, there are no real advantages to browser 
detection and targeting.

However, your idea of giving more advanced browsers more advanced CSS 
does have advantages. It's called progressive enhancement, and it's 
quite possible without browser detection. I suggest Googling 
progressive enhancement for more on the general idea, and reading the 
book Transcending CSS for in-depth teaching of how to design and develop 
web sites with a progressive enhancement mindset. (The author states the 
transcending way of designing goes beyond progressive enhancement, but 
I think it's just mincing words -- same basic concept and techniques.)

Best,
Zoe

-- 
Zoe M. Gillenwater
Design Services Manager
UNC Highway Safety Research Center
http://www.hsrc.unc.edu

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/