[css-d] CSS question
I have a question can CSS be used to change the web address on a browers from http://www.luinrandir.com/cgi-bin/ArgMatey/ArgMatey.cgi to www.ArgMatey.com I know it can be done form the host from a html frame, but I need to find a different way. So can CSS do this? thank Lou __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] css question
The below css is ripped from another thread
#sidebar {position: relative;}
#sidebar {position: relative}
Are both of these writings correct, or are there any differencies in
which version of ccs you are using in connection to (x)HTML.
--
Regards / Mhv.
Ib K. jensen - http://ikjensen.dk
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] CSS Question
I'm not sure if this is a css issue or not but have been struggling to determine the cause. My dropdown menu seems to disappear below my google ad banner at the top of the main content instead of appearing above it. The same thing occurs with my lightbox gallery images. Is this a css issue? Has anyone had this problem with css? I'd provide code but not sure what to provide. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS question
If you are talking about 1) redirecting the short one to the long one or 2) masking the URL to appear as the short one...No. Using PHP, if possible, modifying the htaccess with some REGEX would be a relevant search. Keith D. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] css question
On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Ib Jensen wrote:
> #sidebar {position: relative;}
>
> #sidebar {position: relative}
>
>
> Are both of these writings correct,
Yes
> or are there any differencies in
> which version of ccs you are using in connection to (x)HTML.
No.
Note: I make it a habit of always terminate a rule with a semi-column,
even if it is the last one in a block.
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] css question
> The below css is ripped from another thread
>
> #sidebar {position: relative;}
>
> #sidebar {position: relative}
>
>
> Are both of these writings correct, or are there any differencies in
> which version of ccs you are using in connection to (x)HTML.
>
Yes, both are correct and there are no differences.
for me, it is helpful terminate every rule with a semi-colon even if
it is the last one.
in the past, i used to get css errors just because of the missing semi-colon.
so i made it a habit.
Virgil
http://www.jampmark.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] css question
2009/2/10 Ib Jensen :
> #sidebar {position: relative;}
> #sidebar {position: relative}
>
> Are both of these writings correct, or are there any differencies in
> which version of ccs you are using in connection to (x)HTML.
In all versions of CSS, the semi-colon separates property / value
pairs. The last pair in a rule-set doesn't need to have one, but it
does no harm to include it.
I would recommend, as a matter of coding style, to always include it.
It reduces the risk that you'll add a new property / value pair to the
end and forget to add the semi-colon before it.
--
David Dorward
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] css question
> -Original Message-
> From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Ib Jensen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: [css-d] css question
>
> The below css is ripped from another thread
>
> #sidebar {position: relative;}
>
> #sidebar {position: relative}
>
>
> Are both of these writings correct, or are there any differencies in
> which version of ccs you are using in connection to (x)HTML.
Yes, both are correct, but Safari 2 may not recover if the last declaration
is dropped and there is no ";" at the end of the block:
For example:
#sidebar {property:value;_property: value}
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS Question
On 4/7/11 10:19 PM, cssl...@bassonhook.com wrote: I'd provide code but not sure what to provide. Simple. Put your stuff on a public server and provide the the uri to it in your post to the list. Best, ~d -- http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS Question
> On 4/7/11 10:19 PM, cssl...@bassonhook.com wrote: >> I'd provide code but not >> sure what to provide. >> > > > > > Simple. Put your stuff on a public server and provide the the uri to it > in your post to the list. > > Best, > ~d > > > > -- > http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ > http://chelseacreekstudio.com/fa/ > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > Sorry I thought this list had rules disallowing the posting of urls. http://www.freehostbc.com/fnfsportsfishing/galleries/gallery.html __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS Question
cssl...@bassonhook.com wrote: List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ Sorry I thought this list had rules disallowing the posting of urls. Well, that would be rather absurd when the topic is CSS, wouldn't it? And a link to the policy document was, among other things, in the standard set of links that you quoted (see above). http://www.freehostbc.com/fnfsportsfishing/galleries/gallery.html There are several markup (HTML) and CSS errors that you should fix first. Use http://validator.w3.org/ http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ to detect the errors. Oh, and in future, please include a key statement that describes what the problem was - people may have deleted previous messages of this thread, and the Subject line isn't particularly descriptive. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS Question
On 08.04.2011 08:36, cssl...@bassonhook.com wrote:
http://www.freehostbc.com/fnfsportsfishing/galleries/gallery.html
The addition of...
#nav {position: relative; z-index: 1;}
...will stack nav dropdowns in front of all else in that gallery page.
regards
Georg
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS Question
> On 08.04.2011 08:36, cssl...@bassonhook.com wrote:
>> http://www.freehostbc.com/fnfsportsfishing/galleries/gallery.html
>
>
> The addition of...
>
> #nav {position: relative; z-index: 1;}
>
> ...will stack nav dropdowns in front of all else in that gallery page.
>
> regards
> Georg
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
Thanks Georg very much that did the trick.
And I am working on the validation so as to not anger anyone again.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] CSS question (was: CSS/Dreamweaver question)
Pardue, Karen T. wrote: >[...] It is my understanding that by choosing "Heading 3", for >example, I will apply the style for that selected heading according to >what is in the attached style sheet for "Heading 3". >My colleague [...] instead uses the CSS Styles Panel to select such >font styles as I wrote above (.SanText90Centered). >I realize both options draw from the attached style sheet. > >However, when creating a heading, I want to quickly select what styles >I assigned to the various headings within the style sheet so I don't >have to remember that Heading 1 was .SanText120Left, etc. > >Am I missing something? In the context of my question, what are the >advantages of the CSS Style Panel other than selecting styles on the >fly? >Thanks for any help, >Karen Pardue > Hi Karen, I think there are 2 possibilities, depending on the way of using the tag: * The headers are used only as a styling elements (without any meaning about heading). In this case there is no difference or advantage which method is used > both giving the same result, though a [] is faster typed as [class="SanText120Left"] - you see, I don't use Deamweaver, but Notepad. ;-) But the question is: should headers be used as styling-only elements? No, IMO. - See next bullet! * The headers are used as headers, and have (as headers) a special style. In this case there is a fundamental difference. Choosing a is pointing to a new element in the page structure: "Important, new part of the page is starting!" Choosing a class on the fly doesn't mean any change in page structure. For instance it can be given for merely designing purposes: "To get a good visual equilibrium in the page, here a light green background is needed / a change of font-family, etc." If it is a real header (in this case it is!), then the advantage of the header tag is: accessibility on all fronts! o The html and css will get a better, clear model. o It is easier to come back into css or html if something has to be changed. o When a visitor has turned off the stylesheet (or is using a client side stylesheet), the header is still a header. o In a text-reading browser, it's often possible to jump through the headers, to get a quick impression of the page, without having to wait until the whole page is read. The text reader doesn't tell the styles of a class, even a style with a font-size of 3 times the h1 and a 20px red border doesn't get any emphasis, though on screen you can't miss it! o Also search engines (robots) like page structure and headers: the words in the headers get more importance at indexing, which can have influence on the ranking too. Then you wrote you want to quickly select what styles are assigned to the various headings within the style sheet so you don't have to remember that Heading 1 was .SanText120Left, etc. If a html-editor and/or css-editor doesn't have this option, you always can make a "styling dummy": a html-page with all headers and other elements for choosing - you can have it opened in your browser when developing. One click to this page, and you know not only the style of the h3, but also of the h1 and h2 above and the h4, h5 under it. :-) Success! francky __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
